Comment: The silence of the urban industrial elite

Why nobody in the industry is willing to speak against Ali Enterprises.


Farooq Tirmizi September 15, 2012

KARACHI: It turns out that what it takes to silence the loudest lobby in the country is a fire, and the deaths of hundreds of innocent workers. The textile lobby, which ordinarily seems to never run out of ways to tell the country how it is indispensible to the economy, has been rendered mute by the fire in Karachi. Their silence is deafening.

Despite the glare of the media on the fire at Ali Enterprises, much is still unknown about the conflagration, how it started and who shares how much blame. But as journalists try to find out more about the fire, the factory and its owners, one thing is becoming increasingly clear: nobody who knows anything about these people is willing to say anything.

Indeed, virtually every person affiliated with the textile industry who spoke to The Express Tribune claimed to not know anything about the factory, what it produced or which European brands it sold to. This is the kind of information that, before the fire, would have taken our reporters less than a few hours’ worth of investigating to find out. But after the fire, an invisible memo seems to have gone out to the textile industry’s magnates: stay quiet or they will lynch you.

Indeed, the few people who did say anything felt the need to remind us that this fire will damage Pakistan’s exports. That nearly 300 people died a horrific death in the factory seemed, at best, a parenthetical concern for them.

The reason for this silence is easy enough to explain. It exposed the dirty little secret that the industrial elite of Pakistan has been hiding for a very long time: their wealth and power is dependent on the very same kind of exploitative behaviour that they never seem to tire of accusing the rural aristocratic elite of. Ali Gul Pir made a hilarious video mocking the arrogance of the “waderey ka beta” (the rural aristocrat’s son), but he may as well have said the same thing about the children of the urban elite.

The problem for this elite now is that they can no longer hide this inconvenient truth. And so they all choose to remain silent. Had this not been the case, the owners of Ali Enterprises would have had a reasonable defence: industrial accidents can happen even at factories that follow the strictest of safety procedures. Fires can spread quickly in a place that has lots of cloth and cotton. And it can get difficult to manage a panicked crowd once a fire starts.

It may yet turn out that the factory owners did the best they could. If that is the case, then we all owe them a great apology for assuming the worst about them. If not, then the factory should be handed over to the employees as shareholders. The owners’ remaining assets could be seized as further compensation to recapitalise the company. And the faculty of business schools like IBA or LUMS might be persuaded to help the new shareholders hire a new management team.

But the industrial elite as a whole knows that this is not just about the deaths, though that is the biggest tragedy. It is about the broader issue: the fact that now everybody knows that they do not pay minimum wage to most of their workers, or provide them with a safe working environment, or really any benefits of any kind. Everyone now knows that they treat their employees like scum. The few who do not are not scared of anyone, even now.

Disasters like this have occurred in every nation’s early industrialisation process. New York had a horrific textile factory fire in 1913, leading the United States to enact more protective legislation for workers. Pakistan probably does not need more legislation. But we do need much more vigorous enforcement and that is a goal we should start striving towards. Let us not let the deaths of those who perished be in vain.

Published in The Express Tribune, September 15th, 2012.

COMMENTS (12)

awestruck industrialist | 11 years ago | Reply

There is simply no doubt that Pakistan's manufacturing sector must educate itself in matters of operational efficiency, and stop relying on cheap labor. Training, benefits and an alligned structure supporting manpower are some (but not the only) aspects that will add to bringing about this change. I will be the first to admit industries (most of which, textiles) have been coddled over their existence. But should we use these public forums to cry about how we got screwed by industrialists in the past, or provide solutions on how that should not happen in the future?

In any industry/society/family, there exist good and bad exmaples of how things ought to be. Simply having good examples does not make the bad any less bad, or does not help to 'average out' the group.. which is not at all what I'm implying. Only that as a society and as a nation (not just a state), we should point to the examples we consider good instead of always pointing out the flaws of the bad.

I beleive we can learn with a positive outlook. The negativity in our lives is corroding our nature and our ability to move forward.

Zaheer | 11 years ago | Reply

@awestruck industrialist: I agree with some of your points. But, the general condition of workers' rights in our factories are similar to each other. For instance, lack of training of employees, low salaries, not providing essential social security to workers, lack of payment of overtime to workers ...and the list goes on.

I am not saying all industrialists are same, but there are many who dont want to bring change in their factories where ever they have to spend money.

Somehow majority of industrialists are part of this gruesome incident because nobody is coming out and sharing the insights of corrupt system that has caused this incident.

VIEW MORE COMMENTS
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ