‘Provocative speech’: Malik Ishaq granted bail

Ishaq is not expected to be released today as he is also currently accused in other cases.


Asad Kharal September 10, 2012
‘Provocative speech’: Malik Ishaq granted bail

LAHORE: An additional district and sessions judge on Monday granted bail to Lashkar-e-Jhangvi (LeJ) co-founder Malik Ishaq on the submission of a surety bond worth Rs500,000.

Ishaq is not expected to be released today as the bail has not been submitted, and he is also currently accused in other cases.

He was arrested earlier this month and was sent on a 14-day judicial remand to Kot Lakhpat jail in a case registered against him for giving a “provocative speech to spread hatred” during a Khatm-e-Nabuwwat rally near Lahore.

The case had been registered under Article 295-A of the Pakistan Penal Code and Section 3 of the Amplifier Act.

The bail plea of Ishaq said that the Article 295-A of the Pakistan Penal Code does not apply in this case and it was a mala fide action on part of the police to register the case.

COMMENTS (63)

Zeeshan | 12 years ago | Reply

If you believe in judiciary and constitution then keep in mind apex court of Pakistan declared him innocent in those cases which was charged on him. Either you denied to apex court and constitution or accept him as innocent in murder cases. Governor Sindh , Zardari, Nawaz and other prominent leaders are also got clearance from court in high profile corruption and murder cases. why are not you asking them killer, corrupt and consequently disqualified form regime?

He was detained 14 years, why did not prove if he was guilty. Our media and elite class are hypocrite when prominent political leader free from court you say they did nothing and nothing could be prove against them so they are innocent, here you are adopting dual standard.

Raza Khan | 12 years ago | Reply

Justice is a joke in our country!

VIEW MORE COMMENTS
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ