While we all know Raja Pervaiz Ashraf has gained notoriety, and rightly so for giving false deadlines, however, one is entitled to mild stupefaction when a senior journalist says that the day of his election is the most depressing day of his life. Surely, he does not consider the new PM’s election a bigger catastrophe then Ziaul Haq coming to power. Another firebrand media pundit expressed his desire to leave the country because of this abysmal choice for PM. I am certain he would have been this outraged when General (retd) Pervez Musharraf took over or when Moeen Qureshi or Shaukat Aziz were ‘appointed’, or maybe he wasn’t. Also be careful not to exhaust all your outrage, save some for the less important matters such as suicide bombings and the Shia killings etc. Raja Pervaiz Ashraf has been elected by a quite overwhelming majority, with no ‘Changa Manga’ or ‘Midnight Jackal’, which is a breakthrough.
The new prime minister has allegations of corruption and perhaps, more significantly and tangibly of incompetence. Yet, watching a recent television programme it occurred to me that they may not be the only reasons for resentment. In that television programme, a top anchor person showed a clip of Raja Pervaiz Ashraf, wherein he pronounced the ‘Q’ in PML-Q in the typical Urdu/Punjabi pronunciation of the alphabet, which vaguely speaking has a tiny howl at the end and then went on to mock him repeating the same pronunciation. The point of this exhibition was to demonstrate how uncouth the new PM was: we do not like him because he is an upstart, a common man, perhaps, not the best representative example of a common man, yet unquestionably common. To be painfully honest, the anchor person would probably belong to the same class originally and his proficiency of the English language and phonetics would also make for easy criticism. I dare the said anchor to mock the Urdu of Mohammad Ali Jinnah, which also left much to be desired. The problem with Pakistan’s middle class like most middle classes is that they hate themselves.
I do not like Malik Riaz one bit either but the jokes about his pronunciation of the word ‘screw’ have outlived their amusement value. Remaining on television anchors, sometime back I saw another gallant chat show host refer to Malik Riaz as “Riaz Thekaydar” repeatedly and perhaps, too strenuously. I can understand him saying it once to declare his independence but to protract the use of “Thekaydar” as a pejorative word is just cheap. Again, it is not elitism in the personal sense since the said anchor probably would be self made, it is self-hatred. Malik Riaz and Raja Pervaiz can and should be justifiably and scathingly criticised for a lot of things. However, the fact that they give the impression of guys who imbibe top shelf single malt with Pepsi in large gulps, while admittedly being personally irksome is not one of them.
We do not like corruption or deceit, but we really, really do not like it when the common man does it. Fake degrees make us a bit angry, however, if it is Jamshed Dasti’s fake degree, that is earth shattering, “what have we come to” apocalyptic stuff. It is also cathartic at some level, I am sure many of our media gurus and opinion-makers are secretly thrilled and all of their birthdays have come together. A target as unchallenging as Raja Pervaiz Ashraf would make it easier to look smug and the airs of superiority will not seem as phony. I can imagine Raja Pervaiz Ashraf saying some purged version of Tony Montana’s in Scarface, “You need people like me so you can point your finger and say, that’s the bad guy”.
There has been some talk of a recent Pew survey and I see a lot of urban middle-class folks getting fairly excited about it. I restrain myself from commenting on the finding. However, if surveys catch your fancy, there is a bigger survey held periodically that all of you are invited to, it is called the ‘general election’. Make sure you do not miss it. The moralising of the urban middle class is particularly irritating when one realises that most of them do not vote; worse still consider all politics dirty business. I am told that winds of change are blowing and we will see it in the next election, I certainly wish that is so and look forward to it.
No one is really happy about the new PM, except perhaps, his immediate family and no one has to like him. The seminal question is this: is bearing Raja Pervaiz Ashraf being allowed to complete his term of a few months too high a price for the democratic system to continue? I go for high stakes and say the categorical answer is “no”. He maybe a bad example of a very important principle but the principle trumps the personality quite easily. Do not underestimate yourself, we have survived 11 years of Zia, this should be a walk in the park.
Loadshedding is an inescapable subject while talking about the PM. The analogy summoned to mind is that while protesters have genuine grievances, yet to burn the Wapda grid station or destroy electricity poles is not the smartest of moves, since it deprives you of the meagre electricity that you are, in fact, getting and the cycle becomes more vicious. The same goes for democracy, don’t do it, it is self-sabotage and suicidal.
Published in The Express Tribune, July 1st, 2012.
COMMENTS (44)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ
@ Asad i am glad you are still young and there is plenty of time for you to learn It is a universally accepted fact that democracy Is better than dictatorship .ditatorship has been tried in Pakistan many times but failed to deliver.The current set up in Pakistan is very young and likely to be imperfect It needs time and space .it will work and you will see the fruits. I must say that your command of English is very good and you are an intelligent man.I am not a Pakistani but I equally wish Pakistan well and I see this country has great potential You have to take into account the fact that all societies are different China is a different set up,the system has been generally accepted by the people but It will eventually move towards a democratic set up ,In turkey Peole have a democratically elected government and only after the military intervention ended that the country has made progress In Malaysia system is essentially democratic although manipulated . people in Pakistan are capable of making choices and have returned different parties to power at different times If you give people chance they will prove their worth as e,g in your case.You come from a deprived background but now seem to be well educated ,well off and confident that is how the future Pakistan will be
Check the literacy rate of Pakistan. Then compare that with the literacy rates of ANY OTHER country in the developed world. How did Turkey, China or Malaysia develop? Did they have democracies? I don't think so.
And for your information, not that it matters, I respect the poor more than most since my family actually made the transition from being poor to being well off. So you can make all the assumptions you want. My conscience is clear and I do believe that I have the best interest of Pakistan at heart and I'm willing to work for it.
@Logic Europe: LOL. I'm actually 21. Making assumptions online really shows how mature you are.
@mr asad malik .i,am sorry for typing error ,any body with basic common sense could see I meant SHOULD , how can someone have common sense if they don't consider themselves Common , People of Pakistan deserve more respect than some pseudo intellectuals are willing to give them)) no wounder there is culture of slave labour and HARI still,prevalent ,I think you are an old disgruntled man unhappy with the empowerment of ordinary citizenes ,Am i right in thinking that you are an ex judicial something please comment in your antiquated English if it is not too much trouble, as they say, in queens English
@Logic Europe: It's hard to argue with someone who can't form sentences. It's hard to understand what you're trying to prove with your use of words such as "dshluld". That's probably the first time I've ever heard that and hopefully the last.
@Devil Hunter X
in 2008 general elections, voter turnout across Pakistan was a meagre 44.1 per cent What democracy are we talking about? The MAJORITY of Pakistanis DID NOT EVEN VOTE
And pray, what percentage og the voters voted for creation of Pakistan, please?
So your point is......
.......if only it were democracy and not the farce that is served up in the name of democracy.
Imalways look forwords to read you mr saroop
in 2008 general elections, voter turnout across Pakistan was a meagre 44.1 per cent.
Let me repeat:
in 2008 general elections, voter turnout across Pakistan was a meagre 44.1 per cent
What democracy are we talking about? The MAJORITY of Pakistanis DID NOT EVEN VOTE.
Saroop thanks
What is the image of a Prime Minister that we want to see - a macho who walks around with his pumped up chest, an immaculately dressed elitist with Victorian English accent or a person who mirrors us as we are and the way we are. Lets' for once leave our pretensions aside, at least for a while.
as usual Saroop on its peak of logic and reasoning. I agree with point.
When we look at countries like the USA, Democracy in practice is the dictatorship of the Mafiosis of vested interests, crooks, criminals and terrorists. Why is it so? Very simple to understand. The Mafiosis are organised to take those elected by the people, their hostage, whereas us, the people are not organised to keep the Mafiosis at bay. So for as long as we the people do not organise our own Mafia or a party of the people, by the people, for the people in control of the people,we should simply dream of Democracy. To organise ourselves, everyone of us has to come ot to work. If we do not, then we can rest assured, their will be no Democracy.
with all due respect, please try to understand the idea behind democracy, its philosophy and its history. no matter what you want to call this process, but please do not confuse the concept of "democracy" with the concept of "holding elections and not be accountable". mere holding elections is not democracy rather it is the beginning of a process, which is only one aspects of democracy, and in my view the easiest one. democracy in order to justify its existence requires accountability and rule of law, and if they are missing whether you label it democracy, or dictatorship or whatever, its all the same as it qualifies to only one notion that is "tyranny"!
FYI. Mid-term elections are also part of democratic process.
Loved your article! Saner voice from a very disturbed nation.
democracy is to politics as exams to student
Agreed. Well said.
It is not important that who is in front of us look who is behind the gun.? If you will discuss just corruption all the time. what will you produce to the nation. ?
Brilliant piece by Saroop Sahib.
Although I don't generally like Saroop E.'s opinions (and he can certainly be disingenuous), I must say I can't disagree much with this op-ed. His call for all of us to be reasonable is, well, quite reasonable.
Great piece....
Democracy, an evloutionary process, is the only way forward. However, this process should be expedited by reducing the electoral mandate to 3 years. Just like an artery clogged person frequents the gym and exercises its body to avoid a heart attack, so should the system clogged electorate frequent the ballot and exercise its voice to avoid institutional and media attack. The power to effect a lasting change is not with an individual nor with an instutituion but with the people. Peoples vote is their voice. Let them say something but frequently
Once again the author raised the bar in his Op Ed. Thanks for the great common sense analysis of the situation. You wrote "The problem with Pakistan’s middle class like most middle classes is that they hate themselves." This is very true and shows the true face of petty bourgeoisies. Quaid and his sister could not speak much of Urdu and ZAB and even BB were not very proficient either. However, the nation loved them all. Speaking of pronunciation Gen Ayub and Zia could not speak well in either English or Urdu. Coming back to the Op Ed, you are right it is not the person who is elected for the PM but it is the NA of Pakistan which elected him with huge majority. Hating the elections and the elected officials shows one’s mentality and impaired thinking. The problem with many urban elites is when they fail to achieve their objectives via elections they use all other undemocratic methods. The fact is elections are won and lost in the rural heartland not by the urban middleclass.
Very nuanced. You are emerging as one of Pakistan's best columnists. We know where the anchors are coming from (and this is not meant in the elitist sense).
Saroop Sahib, you said it! ------- of all the people this fool Mir is just out of place when he allows himself making silly jokes about anyone's accent, doesn't he watch himself sometimes for a review, I mean, come on. You are darn right about these little minds hating each other, it only confirms the fact about their making it overnight from 'whatever' to whatever they think they got to. Poor them!
Saroop Ijaz: Brilliant as always.Thank you.
Saroop - Very objective. Certainly drove your point home.However, I would like to add a bit of social observation to your comparison between Zia's era and Raja Pervez's era. Different segments of the society expect different things from governance. However, basic needs such as food security, electricity, and water are un-compromisable. Therefore, even if Zia was wrong for the society in the long run, since the basic services were provided un-interrupted, he didn't have to suffer from as much social resistance as the current PM will have to.
Live with love, let democracy work
Very well written and very balanced
If corruption was that big an issue, the India would not have grown so fast and had stabilized more over time with all the indicators of corruption going side by side like always. People have always been misguided about the corruption of lesser mortals. We find that those who we can approach easily have been tainted with all allegations of corruption between the heaven and the earth but we also find that they are easily accountable to us. But what will be said of those holy cows who are inaccessible, unaccountable and corrupt at the same time?
After the court's intervention in the policy matters for producing energy through short term stop-gap arrangements, we have neither power nor end to corruption. At least people would have been better off having one thing in abundance. Now the domestic consumers as well as industry find themselves on the same boat. Local leaders of opposition parties are literally having field day in en-cashing the situation which is getting worse day by day. People suffer unnecessarily because of court's puritanical ways and the court has no solution to any crisis now.
For all those who criticize the choice of Raja Pervez Ashraf as a PM, let me also remind them that even BB and Zulifqar Ali Bhutto were not acceptable to them. So little wonder then that Raja saheb can't get favorable criticism from the same quarters.
As always it is an excellent article from Sroop Ijaz. Our society know only hate, jealous and disrespect for others. We don't use the word love, respect for real in our daily life. And we fail to see the logic behind our argument. Live with love.
Although mocking is cheap, criticizing and holding accountable for false claims is quite desirable and should not endanger democray in any way.
Regimes acquire legitimacy in the public by providing good governance. Where legislative has control over local bureaucracy and judiciary, electoral majority is not necessarily a reflection of public approval. Socio economic structure decides the outcome of elections to a major extent. In ethnically divided city of Karachi, good governance is not the only criteria for vote. In interior Sindh, the peasants have no option but to vote for the landlord. Without land reforms, electoral politics in rural areas is a futile exercise. PPP government, although elected and must complete its 5 years term, has lost legitimacy in the eyes of the public. When the most inefficient minister becomes the Prime Minister, mere reference to constitution or historical experience won’t cool down the angry masses.
@Awans: I suggest you re-read Mr. Ijaz's essay. He is admonishing those who make fun of the prime minister's accent, not the other way around.
Writer is Best....
Where do I begin to tell you just how much I enjoyed this essay? Let me just thank you!
Let democracy work.... sure, but lets stop corruption and prosecute the corrupt, simple as that!!!