Beyond the deluge

"The rains are clearly a natural phenomenon. But there is nothing natural about the destruction these rains brought."


Naveen Naqvi August 14, 2010
Beyond the deluge

When I was in Bonn, Germany in June for the Deutsche-Welle-arranged Global Media Forum (GMF) conference on climate change, one of the keynote speakers was a 12-year-old boy. Felix Finkbeiner of Plant for the Planet, a climate protection network for school-age children, acted on an idea he had three years ago to plant one million trees in Germany, succeeded, and has expanded his campaign to 70 countries. In his speech at the GMF, Finkbeiner claimed that in another 50 years, when he visits the museum with his children, he would be embarrassed to point out that the time of their grandparents (our present) would be called the ‘carbon age.’

With natural disasters unfolding in Pakistan, China and Russia, it appears that the young boy has more insight than heads of state. Although we cannot say immediately that the inexplicable weather patterns we have seen the past few days are due to climate change, it does seem to be more than a coincidence. Having read Kamila Shamsie’s brilliant piece in The Guardian in response to the floods crisis, blaming deforestation and a powerful timber mafia for the damage after the rains, I asked Professor Adil Najam if he could connect Pakistan’s floods to climate change. The Boston University-based environmental expert, who has contributed to Al Gore’s Nobel-winning paper on climate change, said: “It would be premature to say whether these floods have anything to do directly with climate change or not, but they are a good reminder for all of us of why we should be thinking of climate change... and fast. The rains are clearly a natural phenomenon. But there is nothing natural about the death and destruction these rains have brought. That is all human-manufactured. Our arrogant policies that have disregarded the ecological integrity of the natural systems we depend upon have magnified the fury of the torrents that have been sweeping across Pakistan. Deforestation in the north has robbed nature of its natural barriers and bad urban planning made streets in Nowshehra and elsewhere turn into torrential rivers. I hope we will learn from what we have been seeing and plan for a more sustainable development in the rebuilding process, and also realise that whether we 'cause' climate change or not, it is we — and especially the poorest amongst us — who will suffer its gravest consequences.”

We cannot prevent the wrongs of the state that have already occurred, and have led to vast devastation in the rural areas of the country. As is quite common in third world nations, where the state leaves a void, it is non-government organisations and individuals who must fill it. While international contributions may not meet the standards that were set by disasters such as the Haitian earthquake and the Tsunami of 2004, and this is not surprising given how unpopular Pakistan is in the global media, people on the ground have rolled up their sleeves, and gotten to work.

Dr Nezihe Hussain, a voluntary worker with the Pakistan Medical Association, warned that flood relief efforts even by ordinary Pakistanis need to be sustainable. She said, “What is crucial is that people realise that donations should not stop after Ramazan or Eid. This is not just your annual zakat. The floods have caused inconceivable horrors, and those will not just continue but grow unless we keep on giving and helping.”

Published in The Express Tribune, August 15th, 2010.

COMMENTS (3)

Dr. Hussain Ch | 14 years ago | Reply Ofcourse Naveen we should be thinking more characteritically and should devise ways and means to overcome a global impact of drastically occuring climate changes. The deforestation and explicit use of natural resources by mankind is definitely resulting in the quick and overwhelming weather changes leading to a total catastrophe. Its this part of the Earth now after Haiti, Psunami and some unnoticed places around the globe, it would tend to involve other water hubs and potentially weak Earth-crust areas. Number one, this is the prophylactic measure we should keep right in mind after we get done with the present crisis. But, as for number two, more importantly, we shouldn't let our fellow people bear the total brunt of the natural disaster. United Nations have claimed a total sum of around 500 million USD would probably be needed to provide the clean drinking water, shelter, medication, basic human health surveillance, food, and a minor part of the rehab of the blood affectees ( a number greater than 20 million now ). Realistically speaking, one government only can't overcome such grave acute crisis neither can the Non Governmental Organizations individually. All it needs is a combined effort which should take spark from the grass root level, we need to spend less in our routine luxuries and save more which would make us deliver at the Flood Relief Camps set up in every corner of our streets. We have got to rise to the challenge or else we're gona cry on the demise of millions. Every single individual effort should count, and every single coin saved for the devastated region should mean a whole lot. I pray to Allah Almighty that may He give us strength to carry this burden and give us enough magnanimity to donate more and more and may these donations not stop untill we are in a position of a total rehabilitation of the calamity hit areas. Amen.
Mohammad tauseef | 14 years ago | Reply Hmmm.... We dont have enough proof to connect the current torrential rains and the ensuing flood to climatic changes. We ourselves are to blame for the deforestation of our land and poor planning for cities. And that we need to take matters in our own hands and stop relying on the Governments. There is hardly anything new in this and nothing to do much. No culprit to get hold of! So what's the point? Change the world by changing yourself...! Making me feel nauseatic!
VIEW MORE COMMENTS
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ