While it is true that the foreign occupation of Afghanistan has given rise to a strong nationalist impulse that feeds militancy in Fata, that alone has not resulted in the increase levels of militancy and extremism we are experiencing. Overlooking other major factors that have transformed Pakistan into what some call the ‘epicentre of terrorism’ would amount to self-denial. It is possible that if the militants feel vindicated and empowered following Nato’s departure from Afghanistan, they may turn their sights even more forcefully towards Pakistan itself.
The recent attempt by the Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa government to devise a strategy to combat militancy, albeit delayed, is an admirable initiative. It needs to be carried forward to its logical conclusion by the federal government. We have already witnessed how many tribal leaders favourable to Pakistan have been assassinated in Fata.
As a result of flawed external and internal policies pursued over decades, Pakistan today, faces multiple sources of terrorism. Although, by far the greatest threat comes from the Tehreek-e-Taliban Pakistan (TTP), jihadi elements, sectarian and ethnic militants also remain a serious threat. Although the army’s selective operations in Fata have brought about limited success, the TTP remains a potent threat. Attacks have occurred on major military installations, intelligence headquarters and places of worship where different radical groups have acted independently or in unison with other groups with the object of weakening the state and capturing power.
Poor governance, weak state structures and flawed national policies have facilitated the rising power and influence of these groups. Illiteracy, unemployment, the elitist character of our society and pervasive corruption also contribute to extremism. We need to neutralise the sectarian and radical organisations that practice and preach violence. The state should stop pandering to jihadi groups as it damages the credibility of its anti-extremism policy.
In 2008, when the democratic government took over, people thought that it augured well for combatting terrorism. Prolonged military rule had contributed toward strengthening militants. But the verdict of the people against military rule and their rejection of religious parties were regrettably not channelled usefully against extremist forces. To clean the swamp of militants required economic development and political integration of Fata into the mainstream, along with a host of other measures. Terrorism can be beaten when moderate forces mobilise themselves to isolate and defeat its perpetrators, but by remaining a silent majority they allow a free hand to militants. The TTP and other militant groups have become media savvy and are putting across their narrative effectively. Pakistan needs a forceful and positive counter-narrative.
Apart from banning militant organisations and keeping a close watch on their activities, the government should attempt to get to the roots of such groups. What is their motivation level, source of funding and who is providing them patronage? The TTP pays its cadres from earnings acquired from criminal activity, drug trade, charities and collecting local taxes. Their financial inflows have to be squeezed. The government has to treat terrorism as a criminal offence.
There has been a large internal displacement of people during military operations, nearly 300,000 in South Waziristan alone. If not suitably rehabilitated, they will be exploited by the militants. With 70 per cent of the population unemployed, a female literacy rate of three per cent, and a large number of people under the age of 30, the government’s highest priority in Fata should be to focus on providing employment and education.
Militancy and extremism will not be defeated piecemeal. Without a comprehensive policy and a serious action plan, we will continue to drift into a dangerously downward spiral.
Published in The Express Tribune, May 31st, 2012.
COMMENTS (15)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ
Thought provoking article Sir!
"....Illiteracy, unemployment, the elitist character of our society and pervasive corruption also contribute to extremism....."
I am glad you high-lighted the disparity in the society as one of the reasons. Unfortunately, it is often overlooked or buried under other things.
The rise in militancy has been the problem of the region for decades. We agree with the scribe’s assessment that “militancy combined with extremism gives rise to terrorism”. One of our goals in the region has been to halt the rise of militancy and extremism and this is one of the reasons USAID has invested heavily in education in the Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa province in particular. Terrorists have made parts of FATA and Waziristan their safe havens and they mainly operate from these areas. We also understand that Pakistani security forces have been doing their limited operations against these terrorists. In the past we have been very successful working together against these terrorists, but due to the unfortunate slow-down in our relationship in the past year or so, the terrorists have gained advantage and are all bent on destabilizing Pakistan. It is time to revisit our priorities and go after the terrorists for the sake of the people of the region who have suffered most at the hands of the terrorists.
Capt. Joseph Kreidel DET-United States Central Command www.centcom.mil/ur
I agree with Ejjaz, Vasan and Observer. Pakistan should concentrate proper on education and employment. No person is inherently bad. He become bad when he is taught the wrong things.
@Cautious: Your mantra of drone attacks making them lay down their arms is even greater nonsense.it disperses(temporarily) them but does not and can not eliminate them,unless you want to continue with drones forever. You won't mind that,afterall ,it's america's resources and pakistan's casualties.
Terrorism can be beaten when moderate forces mobilise themselves to isolate and defeat its perpetrators, but by remaining a silent majority they allow a free hand to militants.
Were those that turned up for PTI and DPC Jalsas silent? I need a new dictionary.
The TTP and other militant groups have become media savvy and are putting across their narrative effectively. Pakistan needs a forceful and positive counter-narrative.
I believe Taseer, Bhatti and Shahzad Saleem all tried a counter narrative in their own way. The results and more importantly the reactions of those who matter leave much to be desired. I remember newspaper columnists implying that Taseer invited it upon himself by being vocal, Bhatti was guilty of moving without adequate security and Shahzad of course was a foreign agent. And these narratives did not come from TTP quarters, but quarters closer home.
Excellent, Sir.
One of the few sensible voices from our establishment, which is adrift between a self-defeating national security paradeigm of the army and a political class completely devoid of caliber and character, incapable of governing the country ... meanwhile the decent civil service infrstructure and tradition we had, we have managed to wreck.
Crime and the middle east are the sources of funds for the various militant groups.
I suggest a good read of the book "Inside AQ and Taliban" by Saleem Shazaad will answer many questions the author has posed. It is a pity that the author has not mentioned about religious hate taught in Pakistan which is another main source of terrorism.
The IK mantra about militants laying down there arms when Pakistan abandons the WOT has always been nonsense. Pakistan is barely on speaking terms with the USA or NATO and for all practical purposes has abandoned the WOT - and if you believe whats in the newspapers it would appear that the level of combat in Pakistan has actually increased. In short - your going to have to deal with the militants one way or the other - but now that you have alienated NATO/USA your going to have to deal with it on your own. Time to step up to the plate.
In 2008, when the democratic government took over, people thought that it augured well for combatting terrorism. The implication being that once the democratic government moved in, the army suddenly changed its policy and stopped running the show, and the militants. This is not true. The entire concept of good Taliban and bad Taliban is a military concept that allows militant groups to curry favor with the establishment as long as their terror targets lie outside the boundaries of Pakistan. The wagons are circling now.
Sir, pardon me for my lack of knowledge, but I believe when there is a will there is way. Our government is yet to observe the matter. It's simply not on the priority list.
Also, why don't they fight terror with terror? Why don't they use elements of Hakani network to counter insurgents of the Tehreek-e-Taliban?
The leaders in Fata were assassinated because our deep state wanted it. Farat taj has been writing about it now for years. The upcoming generals are first cousins in ideology with who you call extremists. The two cannot be easily separated now. An Islamic state cannot be nationalistic. Islam does distinguish between an Arab a Chinese a Russian or a Pakistani. The logic of our ideology will play itself out to its logical conclusion.
"Militancy combined with extremism becomes terrorism"- well put.
Unfortunately, in PAK militancy is not a problem in FATA alone. They can be easily solved with developmental programs and keeping the youth busy with decent living.
The militancy in urban cities needs to handled since they are fueled with extremism.