Still searching

What is most frightening is that even as the hearings continue, the pattern of disappearances has also continued.


Editorial May 13, 2012
Still searching

As the Supreme Court continues its effort to recover persons who have gone missing in Balochistan, it has noted that the province had turned into a kind of war zone —— a situation that adds to the chaos prevailing there and consequently makes it difficult to recover those who have disappeared. Clearly frustrated, the three-member bench of the Court, headed by the Chief Justice, has shown its displeasure at the Frontier Constabulary (FC) in its last hearing and asked who had given it the right to pick up persons at their homes.

The Chief Justice was also displeased with the IGFC’s non-appearance in Court despite having been summoned. At a previous hearing, the Court had shown similar displeasure at the failure of the heads of the ISI and the MI to appear in it, and noted that had police officials possessed the courage to speak the truth, the task of recovering missing persons would have been easier.

We all know why the police are reluctant to speak out. The distortions of power that exist in our country mean there are few who would be willing to speak out against those responsible for these disappearances. To do so would be to invite trouble. This issue of secrecy has emerged as a key factor in our failure to recover missing persons. While human rights monitors have repeatedly pointed to their involvement, there are few who dare question them. People, too, are apparently being kept in the dark, with the advocate-general Balochistan seeking an in-camera discussion for a briefing on some cases. The Court has agreed to the suggestion, expressing the hope that this will help recover missing persons.

What is most frightening of all is that even as the hearings continue, the pattern of disappearances has also continued. This is evident by the fact that in a previous hearing the Supreme Court was told that seven people who were picked up in Quetta had reappeared at their homes a few days ago. No doubt they, like others before them, will have been asked to maintain silence about their disappearance. Meanwhile, other people continue to be picked up; the basic problem remains unchanged and this is not a comforting thought at all.

Published in The Express Tribune, May 14th, 2012.

 

COMMENTS (6)

Mirza | 12 years ago | Reply @MAD: A confessed killer Qadri is having good life in the safety of prison. There has been no progress about his life or death. Like Bilawal challenged CJ to take action on Taseer and BB murder cases, but they are not imp. Similarly throwing 60 judges and their families is not contempt. Multiple acts of high treason are not contempt, but talking is contempt. Babar Awan's case is pending while the elected PM's case is on fast track. Why are there no suo motu in any of these cases for movment? Asghar Khan's case has been in the court for almost two decades. ZAB's review is filed in the SC without any progress, and the list continues. Yet for some it is always PPP's fault. How could any of these cases be heard when the full bench of SC and three CJ of HC are busy in an unsigned and undated memo that the Americans do not even recognize. In ZAB's memorial Bilawal demanded his mother's case to be taken up in SC The PCO court has not taken up and decided one single case which can be imp for Pakistani people. Regards, Mirza
MAD | 12 years ago | Reply

@Mirza: ummmmmm hasnt Mumtaz Qadri already been convicted and sentenced to death with an appeal pending in LHC. AS far as BB goes her own so called confidants are the ones foot dragging there. Oh and wasnt it the PPP who let Musharraf leave Pakistan convieniently before the judiciary was restored.

VIEW MORE COMMENTS
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ