However, a puzzling question remains. How can a government, even an impoverished one, just lease out one of its air force bases to a third country, especially when a few years ago, that very country had allegedly financed the killing of Chinese engineers who were constructing the port at Gwadar? What makes this even more perplexing is that Pakistan has also been accused of financing the same militant groups that are being targeted by the drones that take off from the very same airbase that the UAE has subleased to the United States.
Dianne Feinstein of the US Senate Intelligence Committee, nevertheless, tried to pour oil on troubled waters by suggesting that if the Americans had made a mistake they should apologise. Moscow and Ankara made the right noises and China stepped into the toxic diplomatic dispute between Pakistan and the United States by expressing its “deep shock and strong concern.” Russia’s role in the melee is interesting. A few days after Pakistan had closed her borders to the passage of supplies for the Nato-led war effort in Afghanistan, the Russians as if on cue, threatened to close the alternative Russia-controlled northern distribution network. If both routes had been severed, the Nato/Isaf troops would have had a pretty rough time getting supplies. Could Pakistan be trying to make new friends?
The UAE sent a high-level delegation to Islamabad to persuade the government to reverse its earlier decision. But this time, it was President Zardari who stood firm. The latest US-Pakistan crisis is threatening to undo months of efforts to mend an increasingly frayed relationship and could also undermine the Obama administration’s strategy for gradually ending the war in Afghanistan. But most Pakistanis are sick of the Americans and would like the government to cut the umbilical cord. Some even have a profound admiration for Iran, a non-Arab country that is fighting for the rights of the Palestinian Arabs standing up to the western bullies with dignity and pride and a certain smug arrogance.
Gilani has spoken about reassessing the terms of the relationship with the United States and has called Pakistani ambassadors to Islamabad for a powwow to re-examine the global situation. This will be another waste of time, effort and money. All these diplomats need to do is to send in their views by email or the diplomatic pouch.
As a tailpiece, I recently met a Karachi businessman who was spewing anti-American sentiments at a business conference. When we broke up for tea I asked him where he had sent his two sons for education. “To the University of Oklahoma,” he replied. “Where else?”
Published in The Express Tribune, December 9th, 2011.
COMMENTS (25)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ
@Malik
China, Russia, Iran and Afghanistan- all against the inhuman depredations of
A. Taliban of East Turkmenistan
B, Taliban of Chechnya
C. Taliban and Lashkar-e-Jhangvi and Sipah-eSahaba and,Jundullah
D. Taliban and Haqqani and the seekers of strategic depth in general.
China, Russia, Iran and Pakistan - against CIA secret war in AfChina, AfIran, AfPak and AfRussia
IN SEARCH OF 'FRIENDS'
Pakistan lost her sovereignty years ago when she leased out a part of Gilgit to China
Ah! But it is kosher to have a permanent violator of Pakistan's sovereignty as a Deeper than Oceans Friend.
How can a government, even an impoverished one, just lease out one of its air force bases to a third country, especially when a few years ago, that very country had allegedly financed the killing of Chinese engineers who were constructing the port at Gwadar?
And it looks like it is OK to have another violator of sovereignty as a Greener than Petro-Dollars Friend.
And since both involve long term 'lease' of Pakistani territory, shall we say, A friend in Lease is a Friend in Lease Deed.
@x: "patrick, indians dont watch their friends and families, their brethren killed on their own territory by americans. so they have less reason to hate america. these anti american sentiments and passions have been created and inflamed by american policies, attitudes and american cruelty. in addition, the so called war america has embroiled us in has resulted in breeding more terrosrism as innocents take up arms to avenge the atrocities being committed against their kin and this has further harmed the pakistanis. so please understand the difference before starting on the old anti pak tirade. "
Actually Patrick was responding to Ubuntu. According to Ubuntu anti - West Indians sending their kids to USA was as hypocritical as West hating Pakistanis sending their kids to US. And Patrick was saying that the comparison wasn't legitimate since few Indians hated west and even so - no blind hate.
Your rationale for why Pakistanis hate West and Indians don't may be valid but it does not explain why Pakistanis such as the Karachi businessmen quoted in the article (and for that matter senior people in government, opposition, judiciary, armed forces) publiclt spew hatred while privately sending kids to USA.
@Sajida: "People who speak English have only handful of countries where they can send their children to be educated, unless they learn a foreign language".
They can be educated in Pakistan itself. Why go to a country that you hate?
sending students to USA doesn't mean we should give them license to kill our people.By giving bases to foreign countries for a specific time period doesn't mean we lost our sovereignity.not only pakistan but saudi,qatar,uae,australia and lot of other countries have also given bases to US. no doubt we are a sovereign country and we have every right to defend our homeland from invaders.i don't think our govt has done any thing wrong by blocking Nato supply.
@Patrick: "I have met very few anti-western Indians. And even among those Indians who are anti-western,there is not the blind hatred for US and the west that one finds in Pakistan. "
Agree with Patrcik and disagree with Ubunto. Some Indians disapprove of Western cultural values and prefer the eastern social values. So even if they go to Western countries, they preserve their values. There is no hypocrisy because the Western countries give them the freedom to practice ther own values as long as it does not adversely impact anyone else.
This is different from the example of the Karachi businessman and many other Pakistanis who want to 'Crush America' and at the same time have their kids settled in the US.
@Sajida : It is not just a question of language convenience ....Not only do Pakistani Parents want their progeny to study in the USA, but after studies they want them to settle down there and start a new life too. But all the maintaining an anti-USA stance. Use subsidized public universities in the USA for your education, but all the while keep bad mouthing everything related to USA. Get a green card or even US citizenship, but keep the bad mouthing everything related to USA part alive. This seems to be the SOP.
@Sajida: You make a good point, but miss the most obvious. Why don't these kids have quality and fair education in their own country.
Definition of Pakistan in three words: Cricket Politics Religion Is that it, no diversity? no Globalization?
@mirror image: So then what kind of nation is it that is always looking for a master?
Good points Anwar Sahib but I am not sure who the new friend (s) may be.
@ patrick, indians dont watch their friends and families, their brethren killed on their own territory by americans. so they have less reason to hate america. these anti american sentiments and passions have been created and inflamed by american policies, attitudes and american cruelty. in addition, the so called war america has embroiled us in has resulted in breeding more terrosrism as innocents take up arms to avenge the atrocities being committed against their kin and this has further harmed the pakistanis. so please understand the difference before starting on the old anti pak tirade.
pakistan has shout its door of frienship for every country .A desperate nation wants friends , as we know we must be careful during making frinds............
@Ivan: Why dont you go there immediately. You need it more than us. Peace minus USA, UK, its underlings and left and right hand pockets
@Babloo...very funny.
People who speak English have only handful of countries where they can send their children to be educated, unless they learn a foreign language. England is too expensive. Because US has many colleges, it provides more options and some like public colleges can be more affordable. However, with the financial crisis, public colleges are heading down hill, so students may want to consider other options.
Korea, Zimbabwe, China, Cuba , Somalia are great friends of Pakistan. Pakistan does not need new friends , just new enemies.
@Ubuntu: I have met very few anti-western Indians. And even among those Indians who are anti-western,there is not the blind hatred for US and the west that one finds in Pakistan.
Good article. I didn't realize you guys had pawned away so much.
Somalia can be our new all weather friend coz they can wage proxy war on sea and we on lands.This will be a great team trust me
Make new for friends? N. Korea, Zimbabwe and planet of Mars will do
@Arindom, Its like any communist, or any anti westren indian nationalist wish to come to america is not it?????
whats do persplexing ? It's called hypocrisy and double-game. It's a Pakistani trait - whether from the Government or a common businessman you mention.
China is our last hope (and new master)