The other argument was that, since, the national and provincial assembly politicians are allocated huge developmental budgets for their constituencies; they are opposed to local governments due to a fear of them cutting into their spheres of power. Both arguments have elements of truth in them. The real challenge, however, was to make both camps think about a way forward.
Setting aside the origins of the local government and its relationship with issues of legitimacy, the basic reality is that local governments are a constitutional requirement now. Article 140 A of the constitution states: “Each Province shall, by law, establish a local government system and devolve political, administrative and financial responsibility and authority to the elected representatives of the local governments. Elections to the local governments shall be held by the Election Commission of Pakistan.” Articles 32 and 7 also support the local governments as public institutions.
The 18th Amendment of the constitution is a truly historic document, in the way it has decentralised functions of the federal government to the provincial governments by doing away with the concurrent list. However, the buck does not stop with the provinces. Just as the federal government was working along the principles of administrative and financial concentration, now provincial governments have become the ‘new centres’. Hence, provincial governments do not want to devolve further to the local governments. The main issue, therefore, is how to create incentives for the provincial governments to move towards instituting local governments as per the constitutional requirement. A strongly supported courses of action was to encourage grass roots mobilisation to push for change. Once the provincial governments and politicians will see a groundswell in this direction, they may be inclined to call for elections for the local governments. One of the natural constituencies for such a mobilisation will be ex-nazims and counsellors, particularly in the marginalised community of peasants, workers and women.
Of course, some such process is underway in the provinces. Sindh has re-enacted the local governments, however, it needs to be presented to the provincial assembly. In the Khyber-Pakhtunkha, the local government bill is almost ready and needs to be presented in the provincial assembly. The Balochistan provincial government is sitting on the 1979 Local Bodies Ordinance draft. In Punjab, three different committees were formed to draft the local government’s law for the province and none of them have been successful in drafting a law. There is a need for massive push for the implementation of this constitutional requirement.
The situation is more complex in Sindh. Representatives from interior Sindh are highly apprehensive about ethnic economic marginalisation for Sindhi-speakers in the revived local governments system whereby they may lose their economic prospects to work and prosper in Karachi and Hyderabad. Such concerns are not new in history. Malays had similar concerns about the Chinese economic superiority in Malaysia. Mahatir, however, brilliantly resolved a potential ethnic economic conflict turning into political violence and retarding growth. This was done by explicitly granting economic rights to Malays and resolving the potential conflict. A similar way of alleviating Sindh’s grievances need to be worked out to make local government a just solution for everyone across the board.
One cannot emphasise the need for the local governments enough. Not only is it necessary to fulfil the constitutional requirements, it is also necessary to deal with disasters, deliver efficient services and empower women, peasants and workers.
Published in The Express Tribune, October 11th, 2011.
COMMENTS (5)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ
Local government system provided direct contact/communication between beneficiaries and the service providers. Political leadership with dictorial mind considers it convenient for them to rule through gora rule (commmissioner/patwari). By this way they keep the masses in their control and at the same time can oblige their dears and wears.
Commisioner vs Mayor system is same as selection vs election, selection being selecting the commisioner for personal gains and election is to elect a person among people to serve their interest,
The need for Local Governement is the need of the people. But if the people themselves do nothing to bring about such a system how can it be successful, ever. Why do people sleep where those matters that affect their life and destiny is concerned? This system is the basic requirement of an Islamic system. This system is based upon ages old system of Punshayt. The very first Islamic State was based upon such a system as this system is a just system. Nothing will change for the people anywhere in the world. Not until they all will be prepared to come together to work to bring about the replica of the first Islamic State. It was a system based upon justice thus was a system of the people, by the people, for the people. What kind of people? People committed to make no one their Ruler except Lord Almighty. What more that system worked and was so popular among the oppressed people of the world, that it spread like wildfire. When the children of those Arabs who created such a popular system got a bit lazy and relaxed "Autocracy" raised its mushrikana head and started to be enforced upon them. Today we can see the same Arabs who ruled the world are under slavery. So is every human in the world. In slavery, for neglecting their duty as laid down by the Lord. Lord Almighty. We all suffer slavery due to our own neglect and misdeeds.
the main things is that the local government system is neccessity for the local masses and their development in the local governments so we would like to the election of local govt
It is not very difficult to trace reasons for concentration of authority in our political philosophy. The tendency was unfortunately compounded by the colonial regime in India and thus led to the tacit tolerance of military rules in Pakistan. Needless to say that thanks to the colonial administrative genius a new class (bureaucrats) found it convenient to woo authority through artistic and subtlest of maneuvers behind the scene. Historically they have been the pulling the strings and rulers military and political alike have been dancing to their tunes of skilful sycophancy. They are the ultimate beneficiaries of centralization of power: be it in the province or the federation. The local government system not only dissolved the political authority it allowed the authority to be shared amongst the ordinary people and that is were it hurts the interest of the bureaucracy who find it inconvenient to see people asking for their rights there and then. On the contrary bureaucrats would love to handle a chosen few elected representative of the ruling party (who are supposed to make only laws) and be part of the small and exclusive corp of elite that controls public money.