Bahrain opposition leader loses appeal against life sentence

In charges of spying for Gulf rival Qatar


Afp January 28, 2019
A Bahraini man holds a picture of Sheikh Ali Salman, head of the opposition movement Al-Wefaq, during a protest on May 29, 2016 against his arrest. PHOTO: AFP

DUBAI: Bahrain's supreme court, whose verdicts are final, on Monday upheld a life term for opposition leader Sheikh Ali Salman for spying for Gulf rival Qatar, a judicial source said.

Salman, who headed the Al-Wefaq group, was convicted in November of "communicating with Qatari officials ... to overthrow constitutional order", a ruling rights groups have called a travesty.

Salman's aides Ali al-Aswad and Hassan Sultan, who had been sentenced to life in absentia, also lost their right to appeal. Both men are former MPs and currently reside outside of Bahrain.

Senior US admiral found dead in Bahrain: official

Qatar has repeatedly denied accusations of conspiring against Bahrain with Salman.

Bahrain and Qatar have been locked in a bitter regional dispute since June 2017, when a Saudi-led boycott of Doha was enforced over allegations it was cosying up to regional arch-rival Iran and supporting radical groups.

Bahrain, Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates banned their citizens from travel to Qatar.

Ruled for more than two centuries by the Al-Khalifa dynasty, Bahrain has been hit by waves of unrest since 2011, when security forces crushed protests demanding a constitutional monarchy and an elected prime minister.

Bahrain charges 13 with 'terrorism'

Bahrain's two main opposition groups - Al-Wefaq and the secular Waad - are prohibited from representation in parliament.

Bahraini authorities accuse Iran of provoking unrest in the kingdom. Tehran denies the allegation.

Human rights groups have frequently said cases against activists in Bahrain - men and women, religious and secular - fail to meet the basic standards of fair trials.

COMMENTS

Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ