Revisiting Nawaz Sharif I, II & III: a mixed legacy

Published: August 7, 2017
SHARES
Email
Nawaz Sharif. PHOTO: REUTERS

Nawaz Sharif. PHOTO: REUTERS

ISLAMABAD: From 1990 to 2017, Nawaz Sharif spent three incomplete stints as the premier of Pakistan ie 1990-93, 1997-99 and 2013-17. However, from the economic policy view, he actually left a far more long-lasting legacy than his intermittent political career may indicate.

In 1990, when Benazir Bhutto’s government was dissolved, Pakistan plunged deep into a balance of payments crisis. It accessed International Monetary Fund (IMF) support for macro-economic stabilisation and also accepted the terms which the IMF offered. These terms were deregulation, privatisation and liberalisation.

Unflinching support: PML-N leaders’ rally behind Nawaz Sharif

Coming with a business background, and personally hit by Zulfikar Ali Bhutto’s nationalisation drive, Sharif had no difficulty in understanding the importance of these measures for an economy which had not recovered fully from nationalisation and flight of both capital and entrepreneurs during the 1970s.

Ziaul Haque was no more and hence Pakistan was no longer in a position to enjoy American largesse that came as a package for Pakistan’s role in the Afghan war. Under this bleak economic scenario, Sharif heralded a series of bold measures.

His economic policy was three-pronged. First, he quickly moved for liberalisation of trade, capital and services accounts. Restrictions on the procurement of foreign exchange were done away with quickly. Citizens were no more required to obtain permission of the State Bank for issuance of foreign currency. Pakistan also announced unilateral trade liberalisation measures, helping to re-start industrialisation. Sharif also opened up the services sector and started with the telecom liberalisation policy, though not much progress was observed during his first tenure.

A hallmark of his first tenure was wholesale privatisation, when dozens of state-owned enterprises were privatised in quick succession starting from the Muslim Commercial Bank (now MCB Bank).

The most significant development project started by Sharif was Lahore-Islamabad Motorway, M2, which was South Asia’s first motorway.

Benazir continued with economic policy

During Benazir Bhutto’s second tenure, between 1993 and 1996, the economic policy did not change. She continued with the privatisation and actually in terms of volumes, her tenure can be credited with larger transactions.

In fact, she should also be credited with the first power policy, which came in 1994 and saw the advent of independent power producers (IPPs). This policy resulted in an increase in energy tariffs, but saved Pakistan from load-shedding for a decade or so.

Benazir also continued with the motorway, though not without turbulent changes. She should also be credited with introduction of a liberalised media policy with the first private TV channel going on air – some of us still recall the coming attractions of NTM.

When Sharif came back in 1997, he laid emphasis on demand-side measures and rushed to complete his pet project – the M2, which he had started in 1992. M2 ushered in a flourishing inter-city transport infrastructure.

Hardly one year in power, Pakistan’s nuclear response to India changed things drastically. The latter part of his second tenure was marred with political confrontation with other sources of power in the country that ultimately led to a coup, thus overthrowing his government.

During General Musharraf’s time (1999-2008), Pakistan only continued with the perestroika – deregulation, liberalisation and privatisation with a big bang. From one private TV channel, the viewers could now enjoy 30-plus channels.

Pakistan also did big-scale privatisation – notably of Pakistan Telecommunication Company and Karachi Electric Supply Corporation. When Pakistan Peoples Party came back to power in 2008, it did not go back to its playbook of Socialist manifesto.

Although the privatisation was already halted largely due to a famous decision by the Supreme Court in 2006, there were no attempts to nationalise. But trade liberalisation had slowed down and actually some of the protectionist measures were back, which had started creeping back after 2006.

A different man

When Sharif resumed premiership in 2013, he was a different man. Pakistan had undergone sea changes during 15 years since he was at the helm of affairs. However, he chose to work with his old team.

Starting from delegation of powers to the finance minister for chairing the Economic Coordination Committee (ECC) meetings, Sharif actually stopped feeling the business sentiment. Instead he and his team became obsessed with one mega project – the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC).

He rather penalised the country’s private sector with a regressive tax regime. His point-man for privatisation was seen mostly busy with defending political decisions on TV rather than working silently on his desk. His commerce minister saw Pakistan’s exports go into steep fall, but he only kept changing federal secretaries.

Panama Papers case: SC disqualifies PM Nawaz Sharif

The overall economic policy direction of the country has not changed drastically over 1990-2017. But specific policies such as privatisation, taxation and deregulation have suffered with reversals.

Sharif’s economic legacy is a mixed record. He should be credited with bold measures to open up the economy. However, his Keynesian outlook with personalised governance has continued to dominate Pakistan’s economic policy.

The writer is the founder of PRIME Institute, an independent think tank based in Islamabad

Published in The Express Tribune, August 7th, 2017.

Like Business on Facebookfollow @TribuneBiz on Twitter to stay informed and join in the conversation.

Facebook Conversations

Reader Comments (4)

  • Farooq qammar
    Aug 7, 2017 - 11:46AM

    Imran Khan is also not a right person, but it is also the right fact that Nawaz Sharif is against the laws of Pakistan and it is totally the fault of those people who support Nawaz after the Panama case.Recommend

  • Jameel ur Rasheed
    Aug 7, 2017 - 2:20PM

    The writer could have shed more light on CPEC. The entire obsession of current government with CPEC is unprecedented. The project has no foreign direct investment and is a total loan program. A few Chinese companies, starting ventures in Pakistan have been given sovereign guarantees with respect to profitability of their operations. Above all the lack information sharing with respect to project falling under CPEC and their financial volume and burden it will bring to Pakistan adds to the already dubious standing of current government. This government takes the credit of shortening of electricity crises, while the truth is that Pakistan already had sufficient capacity to meet the demand but the circular debt was hindering the process. Ishaq still claims the credit of clearing of circular debt but does tell people the humongous circular debt as of now which looms around Rs 800 billion. This government was a total failure, all the succeeded was obtaining massive loans.Recommend

  • Faheem Akhtar
    Aug 7, 2017 - 2:41PM

    De-regualtion and opening up the economies has been the global trend since late 1980s. If you take a look at British history, Margaret Thatcher started privatization and de-regulation. National Health Service was put under a rationing system. This was all a part of so-called Free Market Economy concept which emerged as a part of New World Order and Globalization drive by Mega Corporations of US. So, sadly you cannot give him credit for this. Only thing Nawaz has done to create a political dynasty and some off-shore companies which were created by wealth amassed from kickbacks and commissions from different mega-projects he boasts of. You travel on M-1, you will find traffic hardly of note. Mind you it was built in 1993 and this is 2017.Recommend

  • Nadir Khan
    Sep 2, 2017 - 10:32PM

    So much of the country if wood char coal business is allowed to trade in the country in the country
    Will benefitRecommend

More in Business