PTA LOGO
While these statistics paint a near perfect picture of success, what they fail to convey is on what grounds have these arrests been made or websites blocked. There is barely any transparency or accountability as to how things are being done. In Karachi alone, for instance, there is a reported 90% decrease in terrorism and a 91% decline in cases of targeted killings that at first glance points towards a successful policy. But at the same time there is a cloud of silence over extrajudicial killings and little can be said or asked about the victims of these operations.
The same goes for online content. While crime is said to have decreased by banning websites and accounts of proscribed organisations, there is little doubt that an average user of social media feels threatened by the state too. Prohibitions that should only have existed to the extent of protecting citizens from terror and extremism instead make citizens fearful of the state itself. A direct example of this climate of fear is the government’s full-fledged efforts to remove blasphemous content from Facebook. So far, three people have been arrested on these charges, while law enforcers have also found blasphemous content from the suspects’ laptops and mobile devices. This environment of policing has significantly worsened post NAP.
As promising as these statistics appear then, we must have more transparency as to what constitutes a crime under NAP so it does not become a cover to prevent open dissent and debate.
Published in The Express Tribune, March 28th, 2017.
Like Opinion & Editorial on Facebook, follow @ETOpEd on Twitter to receive all updates on all our daily pieces.
COMMENTS
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ