Blasphemy convict’s death in jail sparks suspicion

Jail authorities say Christian inmate had a heart attack, family suspects murder.


Faraz Khan March 16, 2011
Blasphemy convict’s death in jail sparks suspicion

KARACHI:


Fifty-five-year-old Qamar David, a Christian serving a life sentence in two blasphemy cases, died on Tuesday of what jailers say was a heart attack but his family suspects it was murder.


David was being kept at Central Jail, Karachi. “My husband had no disease,” his wife Tabassum told The Express Tribune. “He informed me about receiving threats from someone in jail after the assassination of Shahbaz Bhatti.

Jail Deputy Superintendent Raja Mumtaz refuted these claims. “No one killed him,” he said. “He died of a heart attack.” He was taken to Civil Hospital, Karachi where he died while being treated.

A postmortem will be held today in the presence of his family, a magistrate and the police surgeon.

Two cases of blasphemy were registered against him in the Saddar and Azizabad police stations in 2006 and one attempted murder case was registered by the Sir Syed police station. The victim’s family also filed a petition in the Sindh High Court where they challenged the life imprisonment. The attempted murder case was being heard.

David, who hailed from a town near Lahore, used to live in Lines Area and used to run a small business.

Background

On February 25, 2010, Additional District and Sessions Judge Jangu Khan found Qamar David guilty of blasphemy.

The judge sentenced David to life imprisonment under Sections 295A and 295C of the Pakistan Penal Code, based on claims made by business rivals. He was accused of sending text messages which contained derogatory remarks about the Holy Prophet Muhammad (pbuh). Christian human rights groups have demanded that a committee investigate the causes of the death. The Catholic Bishop of Islamabad/Rawalpindi Rufin Anthony conveyed his condolences to David’s family and said, “I am in grief, the whole Christian community has been grieving for the past few days. We haven’t recovered from the loss and this news has increased my concerns about the future of Christians in Pakistan. David was falsely accused of blasphemy. How much more blood do we still have to see to realise that the blasphemy laws need to be abolished? How much blood does the government wants to have on its hands? Another sad day for the minorities in Pakistan.”

Published in The Express Tribune, March 16th, 2011.

COMMENTS (19)

Hassan Bajwa | 13 years ago | Reply @ M.Ali If history was "distorted" then how in the world would YOU know? I have heard many a nonsense theories attempting to justify the barbarity of the Blasphemous Laws, but i applaud your ability to reach a whole new level of idiocy. Any punitive action of the sort that you claim directly CONTRADICTS THE QURAN. There is absolutely NO EVIDENCE that the Prophet (pbuh) engaged in such mindless, petty and barbaric acts of vengeance. I find it patently immoral that you are justifying today's vile law by claiming that the Prophet (pbuh) did the same but that it was "covered up" (conspiracy nut very much?). Apart from being intellectually dishonest, it is just a sad sad SAD way to justify something that goes the fundamental spirit and ethos of Islam. Anyhow the basic immorality of these laws are clear for all to see. By their very existence they make a mockery of Islam in a manner that no amount of "blasphemy" ever could.
atiya | 13 years ago | Reply when us pakistani people dont provide justice to our own people living in our own country how can we think to receive justice from other government example raymond davis case.start from own home 1st like focus on the minister case who was recently murdered just because he was supporting minority group.first provide justice in our own home first then expect from others.we're the one who are giving chances after chances to talk about us by creating irrational cases and insulting humanity.
VIEW MORE COMMENTS
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ