Coalition used banned cluster bombs in Yemen: HRW

The war has killed more than 7,000 people and wounded nearly 37,000, the United Nations says


Afp December 23, 2016
PHOTO: AFP

DUBAI: The Saudi-led coalition battling rebels in Yemen used banned cluster bombs in attacks near two schools this month, Human Rights Watch said Friday.

The watchdog said that the alliance fired Brazilian-made rockets containing the outlawed munitions on December 6, near two schools in the Huthi rebel stronghold province of Saada, killing two civilians and wounding six including a child.

Seven Pakistani sailors feared dead in Yemen airstrike

That incident came a day after Saudi Arabia joined the US and Brazil in abstaining from a UN General Assembly vote that overwhelmingly endorsed an international ban on cluster bomb use.

"Brazil should be on notice that its rockets are being used in unlawful attacks in the Yemeni war," said HRW arms director Steve Goose.

"Cluster munitions are prohibited weapons that should never be used under any circumstances due to the harm inflicted on civilians. Brazil should make an immediate commitment to ending production and export of cluster munitions."

Yemen's Houthis launch missile toward Makkah

The weapons can contain dozens of smaller bomblets that disperse over large areas, often continuing to kill and maim civilians long after they are dropped.

The Saudi-led coalition this week said it had made "limited use" of British-made cluster bombs, a type of weapon which 100 countries have already pledged not to use.

The alliance, which intervened in support of Yemen's government in March 2015 after the Huthis overran much of the country's northern and central regions, has come under repeated criticism over civilian casualties.

Saudi-led coalition says it 'wrongly targeted' Yemen funeral

Since then, the war has killed more than 7,000 people and wounded nearly 37,000, the United Nations says.

COMMENTS

Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ