Drone strike targets senior al Qaeda leader in Afghanistan: US official

US military believes Farouq al-Qahtani and Bilal al-Mutaybi were killed but has not confirmed strike was successful


Afp October 26, 2016
A model of a military drone is seen in front of an US flag as protesters rally against climate change, ahead of the Democratic National Convention, in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, US, July 24, 2016. PHOTO: REUTERS

ABOARD A US MILITARY AIRCRAFT: A US drone strike targeted a senior al Qaeda leader in northeastern Afghanistan and his deputy on Sunday, a senior US military official said.

Islamic State militants kill 30 in central Afghanistan: officials

The strike in Kunar province targeted Farouq al-Qahtani, al Qaeda's emir for northeastern Afghanistan, and his deputy Bilal al-Mutaybi, the official said.

The US military believes the men were killed but has not confirmed the strike was successful.

"We feel pretty confident," the official said, speaking on condition of anonymity to discuss the matter.

The Pentagon has been tracking Qahtani for years.

'Butcher of Kabul' calls for peace as signs Afghan pact

Military officials had him in their sights in 2012 and almost conducted a strike then, but the mission was scrapped at the last minute because of the risk of civilian casualties.

Qahtani and his deputy were in Hilgal village in Kunar's Ghazi Abad district, officials said. They were in two separate buildings a few hundred meters (yards) apart and were targeted almost simultaneously with multiple drones.

Provincial spokesperson Abdul Ghani Mosamem told AFP at least 15 insurgents were killed, including two Arabs.

Kerry urges Taliban to reach peace with Kabul

An Afghan intelligence official in the province also confirmed two Arabs were killed in the strikes.

Qahtani and Mutaybi are well-known senior al Qaeda commanders in Kunar, and had been actively involved in recruiting local young people for the group.

COMMENTS

Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ