An American in Lahore

America-bashing has taken the shape of a master craft, which is well-rehearsed and constantly repeated.


Salman Masood January 29, 2011

The shooting in Lahore has all the potential to erupt into another public relations disaster for America in Pakistan, where anti-Americanism is already high, whipped up by rightwingers and nationalists as a convenient bogey all the time. The US is held responsible for everything that goes awry in this ‘land of the pure’.

America-bashing has taken the shape of a master craft, which is well-rehearsed and constantly repeated. In such an atmosphere of mistrust and acrimony, a shooting spree that leaves more questions asked than answered is a troubling development and couldn’t have come at a worse time.

One cannot deny that American citizens have to be cautious and wary about their security in the country. They often encounter hostile behaviors and political and religious sentiments override many social interactions. American motives are under constant scrutiny. The alliance with the US is perpetually judged in black and white. Religious and nationalistic rhetoric presents a distorted and skewed relationship between the two countries.

American officials are often labeled as ‘Blackwater operatives’ by some sections of the local media, and this has endangered their lives.

The fact that many Americans and other diplomats carry arms while travelling inside the country, keeping in mind the precarious security situation, is not a secret, and known to both the public and the local law enforcing authorities.

It is still not exactly clear what really happened in Lahore on January 27. Raymond Davis claims that he acted in self-defence. But is he guilty of using excessive force? Could he have acted with more restraint? What is his actual background? Pakistani officials also need to thoroughly investigate the two motorbike riders. Initial accounts by police say that two weapons were found with the two dead. Street crime is nothing new. Is there any credence in the claim by the family of one of the deceased that one weapon was licensed and carried due to a family feud?

The facts need to be ascertained but, more importantly, made open to the public. The law should run its due course.

This unfortunate episode provides a window of opportunity to the US as well. Instead of maintaining a silence, which would result in furthering poisonous rumour mongering and conspiratorial speculations, US officials need to be transparent and open. Their silence would be heard loudly and presented as a testimony of guilt by those who oppose the US in an almost knee-jerk reaction. One incident, if badly handled, can wash away all the good that the United States has done recently for the flood victims in the country.

The shooting has already put the Pakistani government under pressure and officials have tried to dismiss the impression that the US citizen would be meted out any preferential treatment. Mr Davis has been charged with murder. The trial and its proceedings should make for riveting headlines.

Published in The Express Tribune, January 30th, 2011.

COMMENTS (20)

Kamran A. | 13 years ago | Reply Why are you so worried about the US image? The atrocities perpetrated by the US intelligence are a big part of the lifeblood that fuels the fire of fanaticism, across the world. How can we so forthcoming in our righteous indignation of the violent religious fundamentals and yet so tame and withholding of the same outcry when the shoe is on the other foot. Why is all of our "understanding" and the sense of fairness and never ending patience reserved for these "violent criminals" from the west when we, rightfully, show none of it for someone like "Qadri" or a suicide bomber. Is it because you think that condemning Raymond Davis will somehow embolden the religious fanatics among us ? Ever wonder what it will do for the fanatics cause if our reaction to a blatant murder of Pakistanis by foreigners remains as limp, lukewarm and timid as this write up?
ed | 13 years ago | Reply @Harry Bowman: since he doesnt exist, he must not b an american either. he's a Caucasian of unknown desendent who US consulate is demanding to b released. why is US interferring?
VIEW MORE COMMENTS
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ