Muslims need to relearn faith, says American imam

Solimon says the Ottomans, Umayyads and Abbasids were not angels


News Desk December 30, 2015
Fadel Solimon PHOTO: FACEBOOK

With an increase in misconceptions about Islam following terrorist attacks in Paris, a former imam at American University in Washington said Muslims need to relearn their faith and should not defend Islamic history.

“Defending Islam is not defending Islamic history. The Ottomans were not angels. The Umayyads were not angels. The Abbasids were not angels. You shouldn’t defend Islamic history,” Fadel Solimon, who is a member of the International Union of Muslim Scholars, said in response to a question about how to defend Islam when critics argued that the Holy Quran advocated the conquering of lands and forceful conversion of non-Muslims.

What happens when you read people the Bible and tell them it's the Holy Quran?

The young woman who had posed the question then referred to some verses in the Holy Quran which, in her opinion, ordered Muslims to spread Islam through the expansion of borders. “But the verses are there. They are in the Quran. Didn’t empires like the Ottoman Empire spread like that?”

“No, that’s not true, that’s not true,” interjected Solimon, and continued, “The Quran simply says if a neighbouring country violates a peace agreement, or they attack you, you can defend yourself. ... It does not teach you to conquer for wealth, but to remove oppression, to defend the weak.”

Solimon, who was speaking at a workshop in Istanbul which was organised by the Turkey-based Center for Cross-Cultural Communication, has spent more than a decade training Muslims on interfaith outreach. The workshop aims to train volunteers on how to respond to questions tourists ask at Istanbul’s most famous landmarks, such as the ancient Suleymaniye Mosque.

Paulo Coelho defends Holy Quran as 'book that changed the world'

Solimon says his aim to change the traditional understanding of Islam and modernity. “People think I do this just to enlighten non-Muslims, but actually my hidden goal is to enlighten Muslim youth and strengthen their faith. If you tell them come to a workshop to strengthen your faith, they will not come, but if you tell them to come to a workshop and learn how to talk about Islam to non-Muslims, they come,” he said.

The scholar also spoke about a few of the most controversial topics in the Muslim community – homosexuality and corporal punishment. “Homosexuals can be Muslims but to actually act on their desires by committing sodomy is a sin. Stoning and amputation are valid punishments under Shariah but for most of Islamic history they were never applied because rulers and scholars understood the judicial system to be flawed, and the risk of punishing innocents was too great.”

Giving the example of a Danish convert, Murad Storm, a former extremist who abandoned Islam and then helped US and European intelligence agencies track down an al Qaeda terrorist in Yemen, Solimon said extremism was usually the first step towards leaving the religion.

American writer spends year debating Holy Quran with Muslim scholar

He recounted how Storm had confronted him at a 2005 lecture about why 9/11 was not justified in Islam. “When people like (Storm) hear criticism of Islam for the first time, they are not able to handle it,” said Solimon. “They become violent and try to defend what they think is Islam. (Eventually) they actually leave Islam.”

In 2010, Solimon had also refuted former al Qaeda spokesperson Anwar al Awlaki, whom he knew from their time in the US together. Awlaki, a Yemeni-American, was a senior recruiter for the terrorist group and had issued a video calling for Muslims to kill all Americans, anywhere.

“He justified terrorism,” said Solimon. “And I couldn’t stay silent.”

This article originally appeared on Washington Post.

COMMENTS (12)

GKA | 8 years ago | Reply @Sajid Rabbani: I repeat text of my orginal post Your statement of mistakes, coming from a person in Pakistan is valid. But if it comes from a muslim who has taken an oath of fealty to a country, then it would given other citizens grounds to question that person’s patriotism and if they should consider revocation of his citizenship as he chooses not to be a citizen. I do not deny west's mistakes in Iraq. But I question that as grounds for a fellow citizen of the west to be aggreived. None of the other citizens are aggrevied - why should he be ? Doesn't it show that he is different ? Is he American ? We are with the flag no matter what - we have put Iraq behind us. He needs to be with us defending America - not highlighting its faluires.
GKA | 8 years ago | Reply @Sajid Rabbani: Read my post first. I am talking about muslims who are in the west and are citizens of the west. Iraq was bad, but muslims are who are citizens of USA should be with us, not against us. What are the grounds of a American who is from pakistan, to moan about what we did in Iraq. It is not his former country. He should be with the flag like all other citizens. The very fact that they constantly moan about Iraq, as comapared to other citizens means that there is something about thier patriotism which is suspect I am not defending west's role Iraq. But I expect a different loyalty from an American muslim as compared to a Iraqi one To a Pakistani muslim who lives in Pakistan, perhaps I would concede to the point that the west has not covered itself in Glory. But an American muslim is now part of the west - he is either with us, or with someone else
VIEW MORE COMMENTS
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ