SC suspends tribunal's verdict to de-seat PML-N MNA from NA-154

Top court stays re-elections scheduled for October 11 in Lodhran-I constituency


Hasnaat Mailk September 29, 2015
PTI's Jahangir Tareen and PML-N's Muhammad Siddique Khan Baloch

ISLAMABAD: The Supreme Court suspended on Tuesday an election tribunal’s verdict to de-seat Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz (PML-N) MNA Sadiq Baloch, as it issued an order to stay the by-election in NA-154, Lodhran-I constituency.

Following an August 26 verdict by an election tribunal in favour of Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf’s (PTI) Jahangir Tareen, the Election Commission of Pakistan (ECP) had announced re-polling in the constituency on October 11.

The tribunal had also imposed a lifetime ban on Baloch declaring his educational certificate bogus.

Read: Election tribunal rules in favour of PTI, orders re-poll in NA-154

The three-member bench of the apex court headed by Justice Saqib Nisar took up the appeal on Tuesday.

Counsel for Sadiq Baloch Shahzad Shaukat said the tribunal foreclosed rights of the petitioner to contest any further election by attributing corrupt practices to him.

Read: Banners up for Lodhran by-polls

He claimed a report by NADRA had indicated that the election in question was held in the normal course and no corrupt and illegal practices were used.

Commenting on the verdict, General Secretary Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf, Jahangir Tareen – a contestant in the election – claimed that PML-N approached the court because their defeat had become obvious.

COMMENTS (44)

AFK | 8 years ago | Reply Other then The Men In Uniform, The whole system deteriorated and become plagued, it.s a sorry condition for a nation....... Even at times we witnesses too often our superior judges behave in a timed manner.
Waqas | 8 years ago | Reply Sorry but this reporter Hasnaat Mailk and obviously tribune has to be blamed as well for twisting the whole thing and not presenting the fact
VIEW MORE COMMENTS
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ