Herrera's temper costs him job days after golden triumph

Mexico's coach gets violent with television journalist, has to leave post in disgrace


Afp July 29, 2015
The combative 47-year-old is alleged to have attacked the journalist, a virulent critic of the coach, at Philadelphia airport hours after Mexico had beaten Jamaica. PHOTO: AP

MEXICO CITY: Mexico coach Miguel Herrera was sacked on Tuesday following allegations of an assault against a television journalist, just two days after guiding them to their seventh Gold Cup trophy in the United States.

The combative 47-year-old -- who also coached Mexico to the last-16 penalty shootout loss to the Netherlands at the World Cup last year -- is alleged to have attacked the journalist, a virulent critic of the coach, at Philadelphia airport hours after Mexico had beaten Jamaica.

Read: Mexico won the Gold Cup, but job still unfinished

Herrera, who has yet to comment on the decision, claims he simply shoved the commentator in question Christian Martinoli.

However, his version was contradicted by several eye witnesses and left the federation with no option but to sack him.

"We have taken the decision to relieve national coach Miguel Herrera of his duties," said federation president Decio de Maria.

"Our values and principles must be maintained regardless of results."

De Maria did not name a successor.

"Sacking Herrera was a tough decision," said De Maria.

"However, violence has no place in society, in the family and even less so in our sport.

"I believe that Miguel perfectly understands the reason for this decision... all this has made him suffer a lot."

Herrera, a former no-nonsense defender who earned the nickname 'the louse', had been in charge since October 2013 when he took over with Mexico struggling to qualify for the 2014 World Cup.

COMMENTS (1)

Shaheer | 8 years ago | Reply Your wrong, Mexico didn't lose on penalties against Netherlands, the lost in normal time.
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ