IS group in Saudi urges more attacks against Shias

The so-called Najd Province says Shias should be "killed everywhere"


Afp May 30, 2015
PHOTO: REUTERS

DUBAI: An Islamic State-affiliated group in Saudi Arabia has urged more attacks against Shias, after IS claimed two bomb attacks on mosques in the kingdom.

An IS suicide bomber on Friday blew himself up at the entrance of a mosque in Eastern Province, killing three people, exactly seven days after the militant group attacked another mosque in the oil-rich region.

Read: IS bombs second mosque in Saudi province

The so-called Najd Province, which claimed both bombings, defended attacks on Shias and said they should be "killed everywhere", in an audio message posted online late Friday.

The Islamic State "has ordered its soldiers everywhere to kill the enemies of religion, especially the Rawafedh (Shias)," a spokesperson for the group is heard as saying in the audio message.

Shias are "apostates" and "it is our duty to kill and displace them... wherever they may be," added the unidentified speaker.

Four people were also wounded in Friday's attack in the city of Dammam, which coincided with weekly prayers.

Read: Sartaj Aziz reiterates Pakistan's unequivocal support to Saudi Arabia

The attack sparked wide condemnation.

The United States denounced the "brutality of the terrorists" and said it was committed to working with Saudi Arabia to fight extremism.

"We deplore the brutality of the terrorists who perpetuated this violence at places of worship," said US State Department spokesperson Jeff Rathke.

"The United States stands with the people of Saudi Arabia against this violence and remains committed to working with the Saudi government and our international partners to fight violent extremism in the region," he added.

COMMENTS (1)

LawaTimes | 8 years ago | Reply It seems we are watch a very long horror movie. Wish, it stop now before nerves go down.
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ