Imran claims there is no opposition in Parliament

PTI chief says PPP should have opposed Gas Infrastructure Development Cess Bill 2014


Web Desk May 20, 2015
PTI chairman Imran Khan. PHOTO: INP

Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf chief Imran Khan said on Wednesday that there seemed to be no opposition in Parliament, while claiming that Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif and former president Asif Ali Zardari had signed "backdoor deals".

The PTI chief made the statement while denouncing the passing of the Gas Infrastructure Development Cess (GIDC) Bill 2014, which aims to generate funds for financing different energy projects.

“The Pakistan Peoples Party should have opposed the bill [in the National Assembly on Tuesday],” the PTI chairman said.

Read: Generating finances: National Assembly passes GIDC Bill 2014

“Nawaz Sharif and Asif Ali Zardari have signed backdoor deals,” the PTI chiarman alleged.

“The PML-N has assumed Punjab is the entire Pakistan,” he added.

Further, Imran claimed the bill would weaken the federation.

The objective of the bill is to enact a law for imposing the cess, besides generating finances for the government. The house adopted four amendments to the bill introduced by Syed Naveed Qamar of the Pakistan Peoples Party.

Highlighting the salient features and responding to the queries of opposition members, Minister for Petroleum and Natural Resources Shahid Khaqan Abbasi said the Supreme Court had declared in its verdict that the cess was not a tax. “This clearly shows that it is not a money bill and falls within the domain of the federal government.”

COMMENTS (14)

Gramscian | 8 years ago | Reply @Observer: Sometimes I wonder what hate does to one. In case you did watch tv today, PTI opposed the bill by voting against it. Given their numbers in parliament, thats the most they could do, 'democratically'. What else do you want them to do?
scotchpak | 8 years ago | Reply For once he is right
VIEW MORE COMMENTS
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ