Two hours of TV may put kids at high-BP risk

Research infers sedentary behaviour increases proneness to condition by 50 per cent


Ians February 28, 2015
Physical activity increases the heart’s oxygenation rate and decreases arterial pressure. PHOTO: FILE

LONDON: Parents must watch out as kids, who spend more than two hours watching television, computers or video consoles in a day run a 30 per cent greater risk of developing high blood pressure, says new research. Doing no daily physical activity or an activity, which is less than an hour a day, makes one more prone to risk by 50 per cent, said researchers from University of Sao Paulo in Brazil.

“The study shows the number of new high blood pressure cases and the connection between physical activity and different sedentary behaviours with the risk of high blood pressure in European children,” explained lead researcher Augusto Cesar de Moraes from the University of Sao Paulo.

The scientists based their conclusion on data gathered over two years from eight European countries, Spain, Germany, Hungary, Italy, Cyprus, Estonia, Sweden and Belgium. It involved 5,221 children, between the ages of two and 10 years, at the beginning of the study.

The cumulative incidence of high blood pressure in this population during the two years analysed is high: 110 in 1,000, the findings showed. “The figures are worrying, given that sedentary behaviours are common in infancy and, subsequently, later in life,” said the authors.

“Scientific evidence indicates that physical activity is a powerful vasodilator. Therefore, the rate of oxygenation of the heart increases, and at the same time, decreases arterial pressure,” the researchers concluded. The study was published in the International Journal of Cardiology.

Published in The Express Tribune, March 1st, 2015.

Like Life & Style on Facebook, follow @ETLifeandStyle on Twitter for the latest in fashion, gossip and entertainment.

COMMENTS

Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ