Waqar Younis questions timing of ICC crackdown on chucking

Younis says suspensions will badly hit the teams whose bowlers got suspended or questioned


Afp September 30, 2014

KARACHI: Waqar Younis has questioned the timing of cricket authorities' crackdown against chucking just months away from the World Cup, and suggested that rules on bowling actions be relaxed for spinners.

In an interview with AFP, the former pace great said key all rounder Mohammed Hafeez's confidence was left shattered after he was reported for a suspect action in an Indian domestic tournament, a fresh blow to Pakistan following the loss of Saeed Ajmal to a chucking ban.

Ajmal, the world's leading one-day bowler, faces a race against time to complete remedial work by the World Cup, to be held from February to March in Australia and New Zealand.

He was suspended earlier this month after he was found to straighten his elbow up to 43 degrees -- well beyond the 15 degree limit prescribed under the rules, the point where a kink becomes noticeable to the naked eye.

Since then, Hafeez and Sunil Narine have been among four players reported during an Indian tournament.

Though the action has no direct bearing on international cricket, Waqar said the bowlers would now be under intense scrutiny.

"Is this the right time to enforce the protocols and the technology?" he said.

"I am asking this because every team plans ahead of the World Cup, and the suspensions will badly hit the teams whose bowlers got suspended or questioned.

"I mean the protocols and the technology should have been enforced after the World Cup," he added.

Ajmal's suspension came as part of a wider drive by the International Cricket Council against bowlers with suspect actions, with Sri Lanka's Sachitra Senanayake and Kane Williamson being suspended in July this year.

Bangladesh's Sohag Gazi and Al-Amin Hossain along with Zimbabwe's Prosper Utseya were all reported after Ajmal.

The bans have thrown a spotlight on the controversial "doosra" delivery, which turns in the opposite direction to orthodox offspin but is delivered using the same wrist action.

Waqar suggested that the delivery could not be bowled legally and the ICC should amend their laws to accommodate it.

"When a bowler bowls a doosra, his elbow must bend beyond limits, that's natural and I think a solution must be found."

Waqar added that Hafeez, who is a major part of Pakistan's limited overs teams, had been left scarred by the experience of being reported.

"I know they have reported him under a process but that is confidence-shattering for one of our key bowlers."

The Pakistan Cricket Board is facing something of a chucking crisis at home, suspending 16 bowlers last week after 30 were reported for suspect actions.

COMMENTS (6)

Rehan | 9 years ago | Reply

My dear friends its not about big 3 and etc etc.. Its about playing cricket.. and if u know earlier shoaib akhtar was also reported for chucking.. and he was also caught after many years of his career. I aggree the bowling rules for spinner and fast bowlers should be changed.. But 15 and 43 ders a vast difference.. if ajmals bend was in 20's den also it would have been thought its ok sort off.. but 43.. den wats the use of other bowlers following the rules and change their actions. And usually spin bowlers play with full sleeves so that the bend of the arm cannot be caught. So think logically and dnt talk for players u support..

Sohail | 9 years ago | Reply

@Karthik: The point is these bowlers have been playing for years with same action. Up till now it was legal. Some of them were already cleared by ICC. These players were not intentionally chucking, they were simply not aware of the extent of bend and same goes for their respective boards. But suddenly ICC started crackdown right before world cup depriving some countries of their most valuable players. Now these countries don't have time to find quality replacements. ICC waited years to implement this crackdown, it would have been better had they waited for several more months.

VIEW MORE COMMENTS
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ