Unjustified revenue: New fertiliser plants make billions on disputed claims

Increase prices on basis of gas cess not applicable to them.


Zafar Bhutta January 28, 2014
Most of the fertiliser plants are getting dedicated gas supply but they have been raising prices on the pretext of gas shortage in the country. PHOTO: FILE

ISLAMABAD:


A committee, constituted by the Economic Coordination Committee (ECC) of the cabinet, has found that new fertiliser manufacturing plants have pocketed billions of rupees from farmers with a sudden increase in urea prices on false claims of a rise in Gas Infrastructure Development Cess (GIDC), sources say.


In addition to the manufacturers, dealers also made billions at the expense of farmers, who were on the receiving end.

However, the urea manufacturers, which had revised prices on January 1, later agreed to reduce them following warnings by the committee that the increase in GIDC could be collected from their profits.

 photo Engrospokesperson_zpsdaf73a26.jpg

Most of the fertiliser plants are getting dedicated gas supply but they have been raising prices on the pretext of gas shortage in the country.

According to the sources, the new fertiliser plants were exempted from GIDC but they increased prices following revision in the cess rate.

According to documents available with The Express Tribune, the committee, in a meeting of the ECC on January 16, said the increase in GIDC would not apply to the new fertiliser plants, which accounted for a significant part of total production.

It found no justification for the rise in urea prices from Rs1,722 to Rs1,900 per bag of 50 kilogramme.

Sharing the assessment made by the Planning and Development Division about earnings of the fertiliser industry, the committee told the manufacturers that if the need to collect the GIDC arose, the national interest would warrant such an arrangement.

As suggested by the committee, the fertiliser producers agreed to scale back urea prices and sell at Rs1,786 per bag.

Talking to The Express Tribune, a spokesman for Engro Corporation said Engro was paying GIDC because its new plant was getting gas at a higher rate of $3.3 per million British thermal units (mmbtu) from Mari gas field.

This was contrary to the ECC decision that called for providing gas at 70 cents per mmbtu as per contractual obligations, he said. Instead, those plants that were receiving gas at 70 cents per mmbtu were not paying GIDC, he claimed.

Price printing

The manufacturers were also asked to start printing prices prominently on fertiliser bags, to which they said all necessary arrangements had been put in place and every bag would prominently display the sale price from March this year.

The committee also took up the issue of urea sale at prices higher than that fixed by the companies. It would ask the Ministry of National Food Security and Research to coordinate with the provinces in devising an effective mechanism for ensuring uniformity between company-set and market prices.

Finance Minister Ishaq Dar, who is also the ECC chairman, told the meeting participants that the government was giving top priority to the agriculture sector and would protect the interest of farmers and the common man.

Accordingly, the fertiliser producers were approached to press them to slash urea prices, which were increased by about Rs175 per bag from January.

The ECC underscored the need for keeping a check on the activities of fertiliser distributors and for devising a system in collaboration with the provincial governments to control prices in the country.

Published in The Express Tribune, January 29th, 2014.

Like Business on Facebook, follow @TribuneBiz on Twitter to stay informed and join in the conversation.

COMMENTS (6)

Nida Alvi | 10 years ago | Reply @ Truth be Told Please read ET's story published on April 3, 2013 http://tribune.com.pk/story/530322/collusive-activities-ccp-nails-fauji-fertilizer-engro-fertilizers-with-rs8-6b-fine/ The culprits were penalized by the CCP but the amount of penalty has not been recovered so far (as confirmed by their financials) because of their clout.
Nida Alvi | 10 years ago | Reply "The manufacturers were also asked to start printing prices prominently on fertiliser bags" It means that the previous governments of Musharraf and then his NRO-beneficiary PPP never bothered to direct the fertilizer manufacturers to print prices and gave a silent consent to manipulate the prices. No wonder that Engro Fert. and Fauji Fert. were penalized by the Competition Commission (CCP) for price collusion in the past http://tribune.com.pk/story/530322/collusive-activities-ccp-nails-fauji-fertilizer-engro-fertilizers-with-rs8-6b-fine/ !!!
VIEW MORE COMMENTS
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ