The chief justice said “negligence on the part of investigating agency was damaging the prosecution case”.
“Due to defective and careless investigation and weak prosecution, a large number of terrorists and criminals get released by courts, which is not only lowering the image of judiciary but also encouraging the criminals,” said the chief justice. “There is need to improve the quality of investigation by educating the investigators with the current laws.”
He pointed out that each investigation officer (IO) had a “heavy workload, which is one of the causes of deterioration in the standard of investigation.”
The issue was considered by National Judicial Policy Making Committee (NJPMC) and it was resolved that the investigation should be entrusted to competent and qualified officers, asserted Chaudhry.
“It should be ensured that a reasonable number of cases be assigned to each IO. Further, an accused could not be sentenced without credible evidence”.
He was of the view that in cases of heinous crimes, especially terrorist and sectarian offences, witnesses hesitate to come to courts and testify against the accused persons because there is no protection for them.
The Anti-Terrorism Courts were not functioning properly in Sindh due to non-appointment of presiding officers, despite the recommendations of the chief justice of the high court, he said. “Consequently, the law and order situation deteriorates and the people face great difficulty.”
In the year 2011 the government was asked to fill the vacant posts of ATC judges, accordingly four judges were appointed but many posts remained vacant, the chief justice noted.
The chief justice called for steps to eradicate corruption in lower levels of judiciary and delays at all levels of the judicial process.
He further said that “there is a dire need to strengthen the surveillance systems of the courts at district level for which I will urge the members of the bar to come forward and join us to eradicate corruption.”
While praising the top court judges, he said, the judges of Supreme Court largely contributed towards establishing the rule of law and supremacy of constitution in the country. “After restoration, the target we had was to erect a well-entrenched responsive judicial system which dispenses justice on merit in a fair, unbiased and a meaningful manner.” In this background, the ‘national judicial policy’ was launched after broad consensus and thorough consultation with all the stakeholders of justice sector, he said.
The policy is aimed at ensuring independence of judiciary, clearance of backlog, expeditious dispensation of justice and eradication of corruption, said chief justice.
“Importance has been accorded to cases involving violation of fundamental rights and personal liberty, and freedom of individual.” Cases involving public revenue or having close nexus with economic development and good governance have been prioritised for early disposal, he added.
Published in The Express Tribune, October 21st, 2013.
COMMENTS (4)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ
Struggle for justice: Terrorists taking advantage of weak prosecution, says CJ
And Pray, My Lord, where is the Judge who convicted Mumtaz Qadri?
And Pray, Why?
Weak prosecution is only part of the problem - Pakistan's judiciary has international reputation for being corrupt and CJ hasn't lifted a finger to address that problem.
Sir Lord janab chief justice sahib, what kind of prosecuter is he who does not know current laws? Should he be fired, or pampered and trained? And everyone in this country takes advantage of weak prosecution should they get a chance. Why point out terrorists only? Lets not confuse the nation anymore. Can we do the noble deed? And i must say, dear respectable sir, charity begins at home. You should point that out as well.
It is about time the investigating personnel, prosecution legal eagles, and middle-level judiciary were made liable for failed prosecutions/court cases and the resultant waste of financial and human resources of the State. We should urge the President of Pakistan to introduce appropriate measures for accountability and prosecution of persons administering such cases.