There are two sides to every story. Much has been made in recent days of a report in the Washington Post (WP) that Pakistan is an area of major concern for the US, particularly that extremists could seize our nuclear assets and disable or hijack them to use against targets of choice. Pakistan is of such concern that special units have been set up to fill in the gaps that are described as ‘intelligence blanks’ in the WP article. Pakistan is described as being politically unstable — despite having made the first democratic transition from one civilian government to another and done that both relatively peacefully and with a reasonable degree of transparency, notwithstanding the naysayers. The US is spending vast sums in order to gather intelligence on Pakistan and has spent considerable, though not vast sums, over the last 12 years, with the intention of stabilising the country and supporting counterterrorism efforts.
In the words of Husain Haqqani, who until 2011 was the Pakistan ambassador to the US, “the mistrust now exceeds the trust” and this against a backdrop of public rapprochement and a warming of relations after two years at the bottom of the freezer. One of the other sides of the story is that the US has benefited from the bilateral relationship rather more than has Pakistan, which has borne the physical brunt of the hard war fighting, racked up the greatest number of casualties in the process and yet, is frequently beaten with the ‘must do more’ stick. With our sovereignty routinely violated by drones and US covert operations presumably ongoing, it might be argued that Pakistan has just as much reason to be keeping a close eye on what the Americans are up to as for the Americans to express their concerns about us.
The Foreign Office moved quickly to counter the WP report, saying that “we follow best international practices and standards set by the International Atomic Energy Agency” and that Pakistan had extensive physical protection measures, and robust command and control structures (incidentally many of them installed and serviced by the US). This unhappiest of forced marriages grumbles along childless and loveless — but divorce is not an option.
Published in The Express Tribune, September 5th, 2013.
Like Opinion & Editorial on Facebook, follow @ETOpEd on Twitter to receive all updates on all our daily pieces.
COMMENTS (10)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ
Well, according to Sharia it is legitimate to beat the wife , if not obedient;isn't it????!!
@darbullah: So India, the superpower compares with a failed state?
@Ashkenazi: India, strategic autonomy? India was and always will be Rothschild plantation. Just look at its people seeing the paper currency collapse and buying gold.
Atleast Indian currency has some value that allows Indians to buy gold. With the current value of Pakistan's currency, you can't even buy paper.
If Saudis can best ally of US then Pakistan can also be best ally of US it is just that our leader dont know how to communicate, they lack communication skills and need some crash courses on that from Saudis
Pakistan should stop crying hoarse that it is the victim. Any nation that puts its future into another country's lap, should be ready for the consequences. It would be naive to expect a relationship on an even keel when one have surrendered ones interest to another. The US s doing what it feels is in its interest and no one will hold that against it. If Pakistan wants to be taken seriously, it should show the world that it is serious about protecting its own national interests. Else one will have the situation one sees, IMF dictating the economics of the country, the pentagon dictating the foreign policy (on the western front) and the country's belligerent army dictating the policy on the eastern front
@Anjaan: India, strategic autonomy? India was and always will be Rothschild plantation. Just look at its people seeing the paper currency collapse and buying gold.
To be ally of US is more dangerous than being its enemy. Just ask Iraq.
"the US has benefited from the bilateral relationship rather more than has Pakistan, which has borne the physical brunt of the hard war fighting, racked up the greatest number of casualties in the process and yet, is frequently beaten with the ‘must do more’ stick. " this is nothing but PR. 17 hours ago ET reported "Islamabad has abandoned the policy of ‘double play’ vis-a-vis Afghanistan and is making genuine efforts to facilitate an Afghan-led and Afghan-owned peace process, the government informed the Senate panel on foreign affairs on Tuesday." Ask any US tax payer about there hard earned dollar going to Pakistan and you will hear... lets not go there shall we. Also after OBL affair Pakistan has no credibility left in the world opinion.