More Indian cross-border firing: Civilian dead, child injured

'Unprovoked firing' by the Indian Army in Battal Sector reported.


Web Desk August 14, 2013
Tensions between India and Pakistan have flared due to recent border skirmishes. PHOTO: REUTERS/FILE

One civilian was killed and a child was injured in 'unprovoked firing' by the Indian Army in Battal Sector across the Line of Control (LoC) Wednesday morning, Express News reported.

Tensions have flared in the Kashmir valley since the ambush and killing last week of five Indian soldiers in the Poonch sector, which India blamed on the Pakistani army.

The ambush sparked a series of cross-border skirmishes which the rival neighbours blamed on each other.

Pakistan accused India of killing a civilian during firing on Monday and summoned its envoy in Islamabad to register a protest.

Last week’s ambush was the deadliest such incident along the LoC since the two countries agreed to a ceasefire in 2003.

Pakistan denied its soldiers were involved in the attack.

Despite ongoing cross-border incidents, Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif called for a “new beginning” in relations with India amid high tension over the disputed region of Kashmir.

COMMENTS (7)

Hedgefunder | 10 years ago | Reply

@Syed A. Mateen: One question for you ! Just what were women and children doing at LOC ? I have been there 10 years back, and rest assure there is no habitation there , no matter what anyone tells you, except both army posts and whoever is in that domain is always at risk, because these guys have mood swings and take pot shot at each other on regular basis, which incidentally don't even get reported in media as its major event So enlighten me were missiles being fired to kill people ?

indian | 10 years ago | Reply

@zainulabadin..cant stop laughing man...u guys are loins omg ....check the records dude ..the reason ur still on the world map is because...of we being peaceful

VIEW MORE COMMENTS
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ