Revival of local government

It would have been better if the PPP had initiated debate on what sort of local governments were required in Sindh.


Editorial July 03, 2013
The Sindh local government 1979 came into effect as the ad hoc setup ended on June 30. PHOTO: FILE

On paper, the decision of the Sindh government to formally revive the local government system, based on the 1979 legislation, is a step in the right direction. Any form of local government is better than the rule of unelected bureaucrats at the grassroots level. Having said that, this is also a case of a provincial government not keen on devolving powers to the local tiers. The PPP was under constant pressure from one of its allies, the MQM, to introduce local governments and a half-baked system via the Sindh People’s Local Government Ordinance 2012 was launched, which soon became controversial in rural Sindh. Eventually, it was discarded once the MQM pulled out of the Sindh government prior to elections.

It is also ironic that a party, which struggled against General Ziaul Haq’s rule, is adopting a faulty piece of legislation enacted by the dictator to produce a class of loyal politicians. A long list of opportunistic politicians in Pakistan are creations of General Zia’s local governments. General (retd) Pervez Musharraf’s system of 2001 delegated even more powers to the local levels. Unfortunately, there was little political ownership of that system and it was abandoned in 2008.

It would have been better if the PPP had initiated debate on what sort of local governments were required in Sindh, given its demographics, urban-rural and ethnic divides. Designing a system that is fundamental to the workings of communities, towns and cities cannot occur without the people’s input. By resuscitating a system that relies on bureaucracy rather than elected officials, the 1979 law increases the burden on bureaucracy and increases red-tape inefficiency. There is still room for debate on this decision, particularly as it is going to affect service delivery and grievance redress mechanisms. Engaging with all stakeholders would provide the legislation with legitimacy. It would serve the Sindh government well to revisit its decision and consider the long-term governance crisis in the province.

Published in The Express Tribune, July 4th, 2013.

Like Opinion & Editorial on Facebook, follow @ETOpEd on Twitter to receive all updates on all our daily pieces.

COMMENTS (3)

Syed | 10 years ago | Reply

@ ashar, funds for Karachi are meant to be for KArachi, and the allocation of these funds was the matter of provincial and federal govt. Stop complaining,

Karachi has 50% of Sindhs population , 90% of funds in Sind are generated from KArachi, and it gets maybe 10-20% of the total allocation and still you say its less ?? go and do something for your own city rather then badmouthing others !

ashar | 10 years ago | Reply

@Mekaal Shahriyar:

You are right but would be wrong if you say the entire funds have been utilized in favour of people of Karachi under the 2001 system. People run the system, if they are bad every system is bad.

VIEW MORE COMMENTS
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ