Alerts
 
< >

Making thought popular again

Published: February 25, 2013

The writer is studying for the bar at Lincoln’s Inn and tweets @AsadRahim

Pakistan has problems, but the one that has proven best at cutting off its oxygen is the one we don’t talk about. Ironically, it’s regarding talking about things. At few points in our history has the need for critical thought been felt so acutely, but afforded this little space. There is a domino effect that comes from discouraging intellectual engagement and it helps paralyse the country in all spheres: economics, politics, religion, culture.

This is most manifest in the way we teach our history. We have institutionalised chest-thumping to the majority of our students. And we’ve not been much good at it. Other countries have performed far better at regimenting their story. The birth of Kim Jong-il, it is said, caused winter to turn to spring. He grew up to be a talented man, landing eleven holes-in-one during his first golf game. The very purpose of education is to make it beneath the dignity of people to believe such things.

But without education, without a culture of basic inquisitiveness, we’ve been left with Pakistan Studies. And since this narrative creates intellectual voids, they’ve been filled by inflexible reactionaries. Much of our clergy thought Mohammad Ali Jinnah a heretic and rejected Partition, but happily went on to play a vibrant role in Pakistan’s intellectual growth thereafter. As they’re stuck with Muslim Pakistan now, a theocracy it must be. Their more savage cousins have taken this majoritarianism to psychotic levels, as sectarian animals have proven twice in Quetta recently.

But is there free thought at the other end of this anti-intellectualism? Not really. Since most intelligent persons would not swallow the Fauji Flakes narrative and all moral persons would not follow the Kharijis massacring Hazara children, so some are liable to go with anything headed in the opposite direction.

Anyone who calls for Greater Balochistan or Sindhudesh is a secular hero; anyone believing in the idea of Pakistan — as a separate, progressive homeland for the Muslims — is the establishment. Yet, the saints of this counter-narrative have had less than faithful heirs. From the sardars of Balochistan to the ANP run by Bacha Khan’s grandson, all collude with the state when it suits them, while defining themselves in opposition to it. Between the greyness of the statist narrative and the hypocrisy of those avowedly against it, it’s as if one must decide between boredom and self-loathing. As neither side can boast of all that much scholarship, the decision remains an uninformed one. We have a million speechwriters and no historians.

Leaving aside history (that defines nations), the current academic climate, in terms of fostering ideas, isn’t much to go on either. Actively stifling thought permeates every level of academia. Primary school children are openly discouraged from asking basic questions about God, life, society and morality. As they grow up, social convention pushes them hard towards medicine, business or agriculture. The lost souls that actually do make it to the liberal arts universities then realise how practical the social conventions were.

Private university faculty is almost always clashing with vice-chancellors, the vice-chancellors themselves fighting for every last inch of academic freedom from the government. The government cannot understand the term ‘social sciences’, let alone inject more of it into public education. Student unions have less to do with leadership and philosophy and more to do with girly infighting (the ones that aren’t eventually commandeered by thugs). Research is fragmented and, by extension, fresh new ideas are hard to come by. Theses are copy-pasted from dissertations that were plagiarised in the first place. The elite (bereft of such economic considerations) that do go abroad to study social sciences tend to stay abroad. This can change. Pakistani literature is already being taken seriously. People challenging established norms are being heard, if not yet followed. Momentum for educational reform is growing. To become a thinking society, we need to make thought popular again, and we are.

Published in The Express Tribune, February 26th, 2013.

on Twitter, become a fan on Facebook

Reader Comments (10)

  • Sam
    Feb 25, 2013 - 11:43PM

    This is a good article, but there is greater cause for hope too. There has been a sea change in how thinking, feeling Pakistanis are begnning to perceive themselves. More and more is being questioned, esp thanks to judiciary and media. Edu and unis need reform, but most of all there must be more emphasis on social sciences.

    Recommend

  • Dr. PH
    Feb 25, 2013 - 11:45PM

    Hoodhboy on corruption in universities:
    Let us be honest about the situation of our universities and our society. We need to focus on supporting the few quality researchers that we have, especially in the younger generation, and focus graduate education on those precious few with real gifts for research. The goal should be to foster academic institutions and a culture that values scholarly achievement and the virtues of honesty, rigour, correctness, originality and cooperation.

    Recommend

  • Ali Tanoli
    Feb 25, 2013 - 11:55PM

    totally agreed sir. in other words Na dunya ke Na akhreth ke hard to decide who is right nd wronge.

    Recommend

  • Salman Arshad
    Feb 26, 2013 - 12:40AM

    Why people still hope for “change” is beyond me.. Education should also provide the wisdom to understand when Pakistan needs to be left alone.. The current direction is NOT what you seem to be hoping for.

    Change is inevitable.. And Pakistan has changed quite an amount since 1947.. but looks like you don’t approve of the change..

    People want education that brings them close to Islam.. that helps them fight evil forces with latest technology.. eliminate blasphemy that is taking root throughout the world.. fight off vaccines that are causing a decrease in Muslim population.. Imran Khan is the only leader who seems to be addressing these problems.

    If you were right, Imran Khan would not have been popular or Hafiz Saeed would not have been admired.

    Which world are you living in? oh .. the west! .. Even Jinnah dreamt about all that when he went abroad..

    Recommend

  • gp65
    Feb 26, 2013 - 10:43AM

    @Salman Arshad: Brilliant!

    Recommend

  • observer
    Feb 26, 2013 - 12:51PM

    Anyone who calls for Greater Balochistan or Sindhudesh is a secular hero; anyone believing in the idea of Pakistan — as a separate, progressive homeland for the Muslims — is the establishment.

    ‘A separate homeland for the Muslims’ alone- Not all Pakiatanis.Mind You.

    Ouch! That hurt.
    And you would still want all Pakistanis to accept this as a ‘secular/Liberal alternative narrative’?

    Recommend

  • Tariq
    Feb 26, 2013 - 5:47PM

    All of this = more budget for education. we need to make sure our resources help our children, not destroy orakzai agency

    Recommend

  • David_Smith
    Feb 26, 2013 - 7:14PM

    @author; I’m waiting your reply to the solid points made by Salman Arshad!

    Recommend

  • 3rdRockFromTheSun
    Feb 26, 2013 - 9:38PM

    This is an issue not just in Pakistan, but all across the Muslim world – name one Muslim country at the forefront of arts, science, tecnhology. And the cause I propose, is the rigid version of Islam as it is practised today, and the unwillingness to change – it leaves no room for debate / open thought / questioning the current rules & traditions. As a comment above mentioned – ‘Change is inevitable’ – if so, then why does Islam not change to keep up with changes in the modern times? Why is a reformist thought considered blasphemy? Remember, 500 years back, the Catholic Church considered the thought of “the Earth being a sphere, and the Sun being the centre of our solar system” a blasphemy. Galileo had to recant his assertion to save his life!

    All discussions on Islamic culture invariably end up talking about the “Golden period of Islam” when Islam ruled Spain and of Islamic scientists and inventors – what people forget is that they had far more freedom of thought than what is afforded to citizens of Islamic countries today.

    Till this attitude changes to a more open and liberal mindset, don’t expect to see any improvement, no matter how much money is thrown at the problem (hint – see the oil rich countries today!).

    Recommend

  • kaalchakra
    Feb 27, 2013 - 2:38PM

    I take strong exception to statements by Salman Arshad. We can all see a new mood astir in Pakistan. None can miss the new resolve to take the nation forward, to combine the unmatched wisdom of Islam with the latest ideas in science and development. The time has come to strike the perfect balance between the two since ultimately there can be no difference between Islam and science – physical or social. True, inimical forces work overtime to keep Muslims from reaching the stage of self-actualization and advancement that Islam promises to everyone. But all those who question Pakistan’s future – rest assured, Pakistan is up and awake. None can stop its march to greatness and natural world-leadership, if faith, unity, and discipline continue to be her watchwords.

    Recommend

More in Opinion