Alerts
 
< >

Disputed territory: Lawyers oppose G-B’s accession to Pakistan

Published: August 30, 2012

G-B is part of Jammu and Kashmir, which is acknowledged both historically and internationally, say MBDA members.

AJK / MIRPUR: 

The Mirpur District Bar Association (MDBA) expressed serious concerns on Wednesday over reports that the Gilgit-Baltistan (G-B) region will be acceded to Pakistan through a resolution passed by the G-B Legislative Assembly.

The MDBA in its meeting warned the government of Pakistan to desist from taking any hasty decision regarding the accession of G-B to Pakistan.

G-B is part of the disputed State of Jammu and Kashmir, a fact which is acknowledged both historically and internationally, MDBA members argued.

The speakers added that the Jammu and Kashmir dispute is on the list of UNO issues that are yet to be resolved.

G-B being part of Kashmir was thus part of the dispute and any decision to accede it to Pakistan would undermine the Kashmir freedom movement, it said.

According to the UNO resolution in this regard, a plebiscite was to be held in Jammu and Kashmir allowing the people to decide through a referendum whether they want to accede with India or Pakistan or remain independent, MDBA said.

If the plebiscite was held in Indian held Kashmir and AJK, it would also be held in G-B according to UNO’s right of self determination granted to the people of Jammu & Kashmir, it said. Therefore, Pakistan could not accept any part of the disputed area until the whole issue was resolved, they said.

They reiterated that any endeavour for accession of G-B to Pakistan would be a betrayal of the principled stance over Kashmir issue by the government of Pakistan.

Published in The Express Tribune, August 30th, 2012.

on Twitter, become a fan on Facebook

Reader Comments (21)

  • Noor
    Aug 30, 2012 - 10:21AM

    The MBDA cannot rubbish GB’s freedom war which was fought by our ancestors for one year. We have won our freedom in the battle ground and no history nor any international bogus organizations, stooges of super powers, can challenge the results of that war. Accession or no accession to Pakistan, GB has its own cultural, historical and social uniqueness which is self evident and not subject to debate.

    These sentiments expressed by Kashmiri bodies from time to time are counter-productive. They tend to act like post-colonial colonizers, claiming our land and our people, trying to distort our history. The Kashmiris should know that the states of Gilgit – Baltistan, which today compose the administrative unit, have individual histories and identities which go beyond the Dogra occupation of our motherland.

    If not for the support and treachery of the Kashmiris, the Dogra rulers may never have been able to occupy our land.

    Today the youth of GB will use all possible measures to stop the usurpation of our right to identity.

    Recommend

  • Aug 30, 2012 - 10:39AM

    Gilgit Baltistan is as much disputed territory of Kashmir as others.It should be merged into Azad Kashmir till the resolution Kashmir issue.

    Recommend

  • Juju
    Aug 30, 2012 - 10:59AM

    And these are the people for whom you fought numerous wars with India?

    Recommend

  • Farahi
    Aug 30, 2012 - 11:42AM

    Well they are right. We can’t act like India and violate international law. Disputed territories can not be integrated into a country regardless of the process.

    Recommend

  • Hunzai
    Aug 30, 2012 - 2:06PM

    The oldest and the best solution to resolve the disputes is asking the will of people therefore, the world must ask the residents of Gilgit Baltistan for their will. it is true that Gilgit Baltistan was once part of Kashmir but one must also acknowledge that the brave people of Gilgit Baltistan got independence without any external help while the majority of Kashmiris are still slaves. I am a resident of Gilgit Baltistan and I would like to be part of Pakistan as an independent province. Respect the will of majority, it is true Islam and it is true democracy.

    Recommend

  • DevilHunterX
    Aug 30, 2012 - 3:01PM

    Kashmir should be made independent.

    Recommend

  • Sher Ghazi
    Aug 30, 2012 - 4:14PM

    Gilgit-Baltistan people always respect and support Kashmir issue , but such theories rise again and again then we GB people will start protest against Kashmir that AJK is a part of India, this is true and base on fact. Yes we were also but we got freedom after gun battle. If you people are too much strong and pwerful then you can get freedom so far but you Kashmiris mostly like India so stay there and you dont have any right to say some thing about GB. You people dislike Pakistan but GB people loves Pakistan.

    Recommend

  • Saud
    Aug 30, 2012 - 5:16PM

    Non of a kashmiri Leaders on both sides of LOC has raised his/her voice against the atrocities of Pakistan or its coronies in the last 6 decades. How they can claim that GB is part of Kashmir? Yes was a party in Kashmir dispute but not part of Kashmir.

    Recommend

  • Umer
    Aug 30, 2012 - 6:39PM

    @ Saud: I guess you are a fake Indian commenter. You should be well-aware of the fact that it is India that has widely committed atrocities against innocent Kashmiris in Occupied Kashmir not Pakistan. Occupied Kashmir is the world’s most militarized zone with 0.7 million troops (1 soldier for every 4 people). Indian Army has got the right to kill a Kashmiri one the mere basis of suspicion (Armed Forces Special Powers Act) and he is not accountable to anyone. People in IHK are not allowed to protest, move freely and even offer Eid prayers.
    How can you say that Pakistan is usurping Kashmiri’s rights whereas Pakistan is always ready to conduct a free and fair plebiscite in Kashmir so that people could choose their own fate. Pakistan even supports ‘Azaadi’

    Recommend

  • amjad
    Aug 30, 2012 - 10:03PM

    yes, fact is fact. If govt of pak want gb to be part of pakistan then y should she not giving us NA seat. V people of GB r confused. V lov kashmir n want to c it independent. This is true that GB is disputed area n still its case is pending in UNO.Recommend

  • True Voice of Pakistan
    Aug 31, 2012 - 12:17AM

    Umer…..Please read History….G-B never been part of Kashmir….Their tradition, future, practices and topography differs for centuries…..Until 1891 – 1947 when British made an ad hoc administrative adjustment of reporting procedure….

    British agree to keep princely states autonomous, in return a garauntee to keep other powers out of influence….

    Since Pakistan created in 1947…later ancestor of G-B fought a liberation war and liberated in November 1947 later than Pakistan’s actual independence day….

    The people of Kashmir by majority Muslim Cowed to India…..thorough only one non-Muslim Ruler…..

    In reality…Both sides of Kashmiris are enjoying political Power in Pakistan as AJK and in India power in Center….while people of G-B are suffering for nothing…….

    Don’t stay in fool’s paradise, the day UN plebiscite occur, the people of G-B may vent out their frustration for keeping them unconstitutional and dispute for nothing…….People of G-B have right to decide their choice to annex with Pakistan without being party to Kashmir….

    Can YOU Answer Me?
    If G-B is part of Kashmir Dispute, Have ever any representation is given in dialogue process as third party? Come to reality…..Who Cares if Kashmiris are shouting over G-B…they know, G-Bians will kick any one out…..there is nothing common…They just need attention…

    Kashmiris enjoy asylums all over the world on fake dispute issue, ever any G-Bian did so?

    there are hundreds of questions….better Pakistan should give some legal rights, instead pushing Kashmiri pundits to spout slogans….
    Recommend

  • True Voice of Pakistan
    Aug 31, 2012 - 12:20AM

    @Junaid…if you are lived in Gilgit-Baltistan then you are portraying wrong perception…and fake/ biased notion…G-B people will never go to merge with Kashmir…..

    If you are not…then you don’t know about dynamics and reality on ground…Do brush up you knowledge….

    Recommend

  • sohail
    Sep 3, 2012 - 3:22AM

    How many more years GBians should suffer in the name of Kashmir. Our Youth has been used in name of so called kashmiri jihad till recent years. GBians still have not basic human rights i-e freedom of press, right to vote and representation in national assembly and senate. The so called province is governed like an organization from ministry of Kashmir and Northern Affairs.

    Recommend

  • Vikram
    Sep 3, 2012 - 5:45AM

    @Umer: Pakistan even supports ‘Azaadi’

    Pakistan is planning to eliminate Shias and Ahmadis. Shias are being almost killed on daily basis. There is no azaadi for Shias, Ahmadis and other minorities in Pakistan. Balochis are being killed every day too. Pakistan army killed 3 million people in East Pakistan when East Pakistanis wanted equal rights and Mujibar Rahman as Prime Minister of Pakistan.

    Recommend

  • Paki
    Sep 3, 2012 - 12:07PM

    really absurd concerns of Lawerys, and historically GB is never been a part of Kashmir.

    Recommend

  • RS
    Sep 4, 2012 - 9:42PM

    After reading all the comments n especially our brothers from GB we congratulate your up front decision. You were n are true Pakistani n we are proud of you all. Matter of Kishmir well better less said because since 1947 at least we fail to understand what exactly they want. Pakistan n it’s people helped (financially, politically n otherwise) above all hundered n of thousands of it’s brave soldiers laid down their life’s But Kasmiri leaders when ever got chance spoke a foreign language. Won’t it would be logical, good for all if all of them openly declare succession to Pakistan?

    Recommend

  • Kaiser Hameed Khan
    Sep 4, 2012 - 11:21PM

    What a Surprise! Does the Government of AJK give a singe penny to GB out of its revenue or Budget? Then why should it be so possessive? I support the will of the people in deciding their own fate and political future but seriously question the right of people to demand rights over GB when they have not paid a single penny to GB since 1947. Would these Lawyers ever consider paying the share of budget to GB since 1947 ( 65 Years x billions of Rupees) Has even a single prime Minister of AJK ever contributed to any welfare project in GB ? We have enough Lawyers in GB , the Lawyers of Mirpur better mind their own business.

    Recommend

  • Azad gilgitbaltistan
    Sep 5, 2012 - 1:41AM

    AJK should be split and made part of Hazara and Potohar provinces. These people have more in common woth these area than KAshmir or Gilgit Baltistan

    Recommend

  • imme
    Sep 11, 2012 - 5:36PM

    GB has never been part of Kashmir as stated above except at the times the British enrouted the reporting line while keeping the autounomus status of princely states . Again the fact is know and should be know to all that the people of GB have won their independence by their own without any help from outside . Those sitting in kashmir should not forget the brave tribal phatans who have fought to liberate the so called azad kashmir .

    and to those who think that GB is still part of kashmir either you live in a fool paradise or you are trying to mess up something .

    Our ancestors have acceded to pakistan unconditionally and let me tell so being ignored and subjected to bueratical rule for past 64 years still we love pakistan . We are part of pakistan and we will remain part of pakistan .

    Recommend

  • Observer
    Sep 14, 2012 - 3:38AM

    @Hunzai:
    You are mixing up “will of the people, independence and being part of Pakistan. If you are truly independent now, why is that GB is ruled from Islamabad? If you want will of the people, why are you already declaring GB to be part of Pakistan?

    Recommend

  • Observer
    Sep 14, 2012 - 8:39AM

    @Kaiser Hameed Khan:

    “Does the Government of AJK give a singe penny to GB out of its revenue or Budget?”

    The reason for this is that Pakistan deliberately split its portion of occupied Kashmir into Azad Kashmir and Northern Areas/GB. The idea was to project the dispute with India as one with regard to Azad Kashmir and Indian Kashmir. In the process, the hope was that NA/GB would be slowly merged into Pakistan by changing demographics there.

    If Pakistan had not split out Azad Kashmir, NA/GB would have been together with all Pakistani Kashmir. So the fault lies not with the AJK legislators, but with the state of Pakistan.

    Recommend

More in Gilgit Baltistan