LAHORE: I grew up in Lahore. The religion I practised was traditional. I learnt much of it from my home as well as the local mosque whose maulvi also taught me how to read the Holy Quran. However, I had the surprise of my life when I went abroad for the first time. I observed Islam being practised quite differently in some Arab countries where I lived on assignments for the UN.
However, my first exposure to the Arab way of observing Eidul Fitr was not in any Middle Eastern country but in Washington DC, in the mid-1950s.
I was staying in Washington as a member of Pakistan’s water delegation. We were holding talks with Indian engineers on a canal water dispute under the good offices of the World Bank. A few days before the beginning of Ramazan, we received from our embassy a printed calendar prepared by the naval observatory of a Middle Eastern country. It had the date printed for the Eid day and made no reference to the sighting of the new moon, something that we Pakistanis found surprising. On the day mentioned in the calendar, we went for Eid prayers at the Islamic Centre. It was a beautiful new building on Massachusetts Avenue. It had been financed by Saudi Arabia and inaugurated by President Dwight Eisenhower a couple of months earlier.
At that time, Muslims who came for Eid prayers belonged to embassies of Islamic countries in Washington. There was no real influx of Muslim immigrants as such in America’s capital city. Eid prayers began a little behind schedule since the tape recorder on which the qirat (recitation) had been recorded developed a technical hitch.
After the prayers, we — myself and two other Pakistanis — went forward to shake hands with the Imam as per tradition there. But instead of a traditional maulvi, we came across a clean-shaven man, wearing a three-piece suit with a matching neck tie. Later we learnt that he was from Syria and had a doctorate in Islamiat from Cairo’s Al Azhar University.
Our astonishment had not yet abated when on the way out we saw rows of ladies sitting behind the men, most of them wearing skirts and blouses and a few with headscarves. I thought they were local Americans who out of curiosity had, perhaps, come to see how Muslims offered their prayers. But I was wrong. They were wives of Muslim diplomats from Middle Eastern countries who had come with their husbands to offer Eid prayers.
A couple of my colleagues were worried and asked whether the Eid prayers led by a non-traditional maulvi and with women in skirts in the room present, were even ‘jaiiz’ (legitimate)? One of my colleagues later told me that when he returned to the hotel, he said his Eid prayers all over again!
Bashir A Malik
Published in The Express Tribune, August 19th, 2012.
More in Letters
Strategy to win war on terror
muslims of sub continent are most orthodoxRecommend
Pakistan…A journey from Quaid’s to Al-Qaida’s.
Recommend
The Christian priests would give cloth to the naked-life Africans living in jungles before they were allowed to enter the neaby civilized towns. But when these naked people became civilized and went to the Western countries of their modern way of cultured life, there these African ladies were made to uncover their body to show up their body-shape/beauty with minimum of dress on their body. So if wives of Arab Ambassadors were wearing skirts on Eid day in Washington, plz dont worry as a maxim says, Jaisa Des wesa Bhes.( you cloth youirself as the Town people wear).
Recommend
@S.A. Sheikh,:
Re read the letter again. From 1950s onwards so many things have happened; men landed on the moon, jet travel became a reality, Kabha was redesigned by Americans at Saudi request, Egypyt and Israel signed peace treaty, cold war started and ended, new nations were born and progressed after unrest, slavery abolished in S. Arabia, S. Africa ended aparthied and so on.
Whereas, the mosque of 1950s have been redesigned as mens club in 21 century and the people accept demagoguery as sermon on the mount in the mosque. Your comment says it all.
Recommend
Concentrating more on the symbols of religion and not understanding or trying to follow the true religion. Typical of pakistanisRecommend
@John B:
Thanks for the forceful lines of your own point of view. But the central theme of the letter remains the same, the contradiction in our faith as pronounced and as practiced, which surprised the letter-writer of 1950. And both, Christians and Muslims rulers can be cited as examples of contradiction of faith by their acts. And you can not deny the fact that the basics of the Christian faith were set aside when the Christian rulers/pilots of the American army decided to drop the Atomic bombs on the Japanese cities of Nagasaki and Heroshema,instantly killing millions of innocent people and the cities, too. And as for the Muslims and their Islamic way of life, for example, see the Saudi Arabia. Here you will note that Islam is of different type with the ruling family and the rich ones of Saudi Arabia while the ordinary Muslim, poor man in the street, has a totally different Islam of which the upper ruling class can not even think to practice it. Such a sad state of affairs ( caused by our internal contradictions) continues even today at much larger and grander scale, yes! of course, when compared with our internal contradictions of 1950 …..
Recommend