- RSS
- Today's Paper
- Subscribe
- beta 2.1
Alerts
Giving access to Baradar
Peace talks may end up giving Taliban a small victory but that is a price we may have to pay for friendly Afghanistan
Peace talks may end up giving Taliban a small victory but that is a price we may have to pay for friendly Afghanistan. PHOTO: NYT/FILE
Entering peace negotiations with the Taliban is a tactic that is fraught with risk. Previous experience with the Pakistani Taliban has shown us that the militants use these talks as a way of buying time to regroup. Once they have done so, they feel free to break the terms of any agreement with impunity. However, with the US having to deal with political considerations at home and the possibility of defeat in Afghanistan and with President Hamid Karzai recognising how precarious his hold on power is, both the US and Afghanistan have decided that negotiating with the Taliban is the only way to go. Given this situation, Pakistan has little choice but to join in the talks too. Therefore, the move by Pakistan to allow Afghan officials to meet with captured Taliban commander Mullah Abdul Ghani Baradar is a wise move.
Baradar’s capture in February 2010 was always a sticking point with Afghanistan. That was when the Karzai government decided it would have to pursue negotiations with the Taliban. Almost simultaneously, Pakistan started arresting Taliban leaders that it had previously denied were in the country. From the point of view of the Afghans, Pakistan was seen as stymieing any potential peace talks by taking one side out of the equation. The thinking in Pakistan seems to have been that since we might not be a party to the negotiations, it would be better to start taking action against the Afghan Taliban. Both sides now seem to be on the same page.
Since — in the two years that we have been holding him — we have probably got all the information Baradar possessed, giving Afghan officials access to him is mostly a symbolic move. But even that marks progress in the fraught relationship with Afghanistan. The next potential stumbling block may be if the Afghans insist that releasing Baradar is essential to the health of the peace process. In that case, Pakistan should demand that Baradar return to Afghanistan and never be allowed on our soil again. The peace talks may end up giving the Taliban a small victory but that is a price we may have to pay for friendly relations with our neighbour.
Published in The Express Tribune, August 14th, 2012.
Reader Comments (4)
Editorial Latest Stories
Female officer transferred
The courage of individuals who resist the culture of corruption gives hope that corruption can one day be uprooted.
Building strong bridges
A united effort needs to be forged to take the country forward without hindrance.
Censor Board blues
The importance of a flourishing cinema culture should not be lost on the authorities.
Unwanted residents
We need to see a dignified exit from the parliamentary lodges rather than the ugliness of a forced eviction.
Drone strike survey
Proportion of respondents who believe drone strikes are never justified rose to 63 percent in 2011.
Eradicating IEDs
Nations need to work together to resolve issues linked to militancy, including the production of IEDs
Changing tack
The parameters of initiating talks with the Taliban must be made clear to the citizens.
Fair polling
ECP must be praised for smoothly conducting re-polling at 43 polling stations of NA-250, Karachi.
Recent Slideshows
More in Editorial
Going after the militant?
This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, redistributed or derived from.
Unless otherwise stated, all content is copyrighted © 2013 The Express Tribune News Network.
Technical feedback? [email protected]
Mullah Abdul Ghani Baradar should be allowed to join his comrades Mullah Zaeef and Mullah Motawakil in Afghanistan and establish a legitimate political wing. Furthermore, they should cut off all ties with their patrons, end hostilities and participate in the democratic process.
Recommend
Pakistan has always tried to have a stable and peaceful Afghanistan and has had access to Afghan Taliban in order to wield its influence for the future peace in Afghanistan. This could be the reason that both the Taliban and Pakistani forces never attacked each other. TTP, however, is a different story and is known to have links with anti-Pakistan elements in India and Afghanistan. With the latest development where Pakistan has played a critical role in bridging the gap between Afghan government, Pakistan has achieved a moral high ground and vindicated its long-standing position of not attacking the Taliban under the US pressure. However, the peace in Afghanistan is still a far cry. Increased influence of India in Afghanistan will be a catalyst in perpetuating the chaos because despite their recent reported overtures to India, the Taliban will not accept Indian influence in Afghanistan.
Recommend
A very pragmatic editorial by ET. The only problem is there is no US defeat in Afghanistan. They have announced a time table for withdrawal and they would try to pull out most of the troops by then. A pullout announced years in advance is hardly a defeat. In addition, the US is not going to leave the area and would be able to control it easily.
Be that as it may the negotiations are only among advisories and not friends. After spending a decade in the area, the US knows full well that every warlord has his price and they are willing to pay that, just like they did in Iraq. Hopefully, the bloodshed would soon stop and the whole area could get on with their normal lives.Recommend
democracy should be flourish
Recommend