Alerts
 
< >

Musharraf and India

Published: June 22, 2012

WASHINGTON, USA: This is with reference to Shahzad Chauhdry’s article “Reading men (and women)” (June 21). The writer states: “By Indian standards, he was reckless; almost agreed to putting to rest the mockery that rules India and Pakistan. But then, he hit the proverbial ‘wall’ of the Indian Establishment with some help from Musharraf.”

I do not think the “Indian establishment” got to Atal Behari Vajpayee, whom the writer is referring to. In India, the army reports to the defence minister who is part of the cabinet and is always a civilian.

It was not “some help from Musharraf” that alienated Vajpayee. It was 100 per cent Musharraf’s fault. First, it was via the Kargil war in 1999 that completely destroyed the momentum built up by the Lahore Summit. Vajpayee graciously overlooked that and invited Musharraf to Agra to restart talks and after having agreed to a common approach with the Indian team, the Pakistani president went ahead and gave a TV interview that was materially different from the agreement that the teams had come to behind the scene. When someone backstabs you, not once but twice, it becomes difficult to overcome the trust deficit.

Ayesha Khan

Published In The Express Tribune, June 23rd, 2012.

on Twitter, become a fan on Facebook

Reader Comments (8)

  • Rana Amjad
    Jun 22, 2012 - 10:26PM

    Musharraf with his commondo style knew hardly anything about diplomacy! Sad we only had paper tigers after Liaquat Ali Khan.

    Recommend

  • ParaShankara
    Jun 22, 2012 - 10:36PM

    Rana Amjad

    Sadly, that is true. Musharraf was more interested in looking good and ‘beating the Indians’ even in his interviews than in reaching any results. His Delhi interview was a complete diplomatic disaster but was misinterpreted by his fans as ‘victory’. Such personal ‘victories’ are very expensive for nations.

    Recommend

  • Hedgefunder
    Jun 22, 2012 - 10:39PM

    This has been a story of Pakistan and its own form of Diplomacy for past 60 odd years !
    Nothing new, nor Nothing will change with their mindset and the Ruling class in Pakistan, which is in timewrap of 18th century Feudalism !!!

    Recommend

  • ukmuslim
    Jun 23, 2012 - 4:23AM

    100% agreed with mohatarma Ayesh Khan

    Recommend

  • stevenson
    Jun 23, 2012 - 5:50AM

    @ParaShankara: How can Musharraf worry about looking good or beating the Indians when he himself is an Indian. He was never trusted by Pakistanis and he only did damage to Pakistan in his dictatorship of 9 years. He sold away Pak’s tranist routes for nothing and undermined the nation with instability.

    Recommend

  • raw is war
    Jun 23, 2012 - 4:09PM

    Musharraf was everything about Pakistani bravado. His fiasco in Kargil was a disaster for Pakistani army. Even though hundreds of Pakistani soldiers died, Pakistanis claimed “victory”. His economic record is also trumped up- more of a bravado. Pakistanis claimed “great” leaps in poverty eradication, GDP growth (which needs to be corrected downwards by more than 10%), social indicator improvements etc etc. All these were just trumped up figures. No truth in them whatever. Just pumped up to make him look like a messiah.

    Recommend

  • salim
    Jun 23, 2012 - 6:40PM

    @raw is war:

    I suggest you visit websites of World Bank, IMF, Asian Development Bank to get the CORRECT figures.

    @stevenson:
    A very racist comment. Go back into history and take a look at who all made the most sacrifices for Pakistan.

    Recommend

  • Jun 30, 2012 - 9:45AM

    @Rana Amjad:

    you must be an imran khan supporter. only a PTI supporter could say something without merit, like their leader.

    Recommend

More in Letters