Sunny
High: 27°C
Low: 9°C
Alerts
 
< >

Militancy or a tribal backlash? — I

Published: August 15, 2010

The writer is a shift in charge of The Express Tribune naveed.hussain@tribune.com.pk

Reams of columns have been written in newspapers and much has been said on television talk shows about the deadly insurgency in the northwest. Its political, religious and economic aspects have been discussed threadbare, but its cultural motives have largely been ignored thus far.

In retrospect, Pakistan’s seven semi-autonomous tribal agencies, known as Fata, had cordial relations with the central government until 2002. The trouble started when the former military ruler, General Pervez Musharraf, joined the US-led “war against terrorism”. Musharraf opted for indiscriminate use of force, against tribal ethos and ignoring lessons from history. The policy backfired. Result: a deadly insurgency.

What started as a little trouble in Waziristan in 2002 has become an exasperating insurgency since then. Is this caused by radicalisation of the tribal society or is it a tribal backlash? I believe it’s the latter.

Geographically, Fata, running south to north, forms a wedge between Pakistan and Afghanistan. And around 3.5 million ethnic Pakhtuns inhabit the region with their kinsmen across the poorly-demarcated border in Afghanistan. If sub-clans are counted, there are around 600 Pakhtun tribes. Their lives are governed by Pakhtunwali, an unwritten ancient tribal code that dominates the Pakhtun culture and identity. Pakhtunwali includes, inter alia, ‘azizwale’ (clanship), ‘nang au gairat’ (honour and chivalry), lashkar (tribal legion), ‘badl’ (revenge), ‘pannah warkawel’ (offering shelter), jirga (tribal assembly) and ‘rogha’ (reconciliation).

‘Azizwale’ demands that any tribesman is offered full support by his clan, if he is wronged. Now if a Mehsud, Waziri or a Dawar is attacked in South or North Waziristan agencies, his fellow tribesmen are bound by Pakhtunwali to come to his help. This happened in 2002 when General Musharraf sent tanks into Waziristan to fight the Taliban and al Qaeda and their tribal cohorts. The reaction, by the general’s own admission, turned into a “people’s movement”. The Mehsuds and the Waziris, known for their bloody feuds, have always united to fight foreign aggressors or anyone challenging their lifestyle. And now they consider Pakistani troops as “aggressors” in their land. Pakhtunwali warrants ‘badl’ for every killing. This means the Taliban’s ranks will keep on swelling with the killing of each innocent tribesman because the “enemy of your enemy is your friend”.

Now, if a Wazir or Mehsud tribesman flees to the Khyber Agency to seek help, Pakhtunwali demands from the Afridis and the Shinwaris living there not only to give him ‘panah’ or sanctuary but also to help him against the enemy. And if they seek help invoking Pakhtunwali, Tarkhani, Utmankhel and Mohmand tribes in Bajaur and Mohmand agencies will come to their help. Anyone siding with the enemy would be considered a “traitor” — the worst possible indictment in Pakhtun culture. This is what has been happening in the Kurram Agency, where Turi and Bangash tribes, belonging to the Shiite sect, are paying the price for going against the largely Sunni insurgency.

Published in The Express Tribune, August 15th, 2010.

Reader Comments (9)

  • rehan
    Aug 15, 2010 - 10:10AM

    A sane voice at last!!!Hope those “JIHAD” bashers are listening too…Recommend

  • faraz
    Aug 16, 2010 - 2:03AM

    I hope its a tribal revolt, but suicide blasts hardly look like a tribal tactic.Recommend

  • zahid
    Aug 16, 2010 - 6:43AM

    Overall well written.
    There was no option for Gen Musharraf except joined the US-led forces “war against terror” Pakistan can’t tolerate any terrorist group like Alqaida or Taliban to establish its own hegemony in the tribal and North and south waziristan. We can’t afford a state within state.
    Absolutely fact of your last line. I think whole sunni majority in Kurram agency have been dominant by Taliban. And local sunni local learders of kurram agency are full supporters of Taliban. Peace can not be restored there unless local support taliban. They should stand unite against the our country enemy Taliban. Who are not only threat pakistan but also threat for other muslim countries as well.Recommend

  • Saad
    Aug 16, 2010 - 4:18PM

    An articale of absured lies. The writer doesn’t even know what Pukhtoonwali is and has divided it into almost 7 different things, wehreas it is a combination of 3 i.e. Melmasthya (hospitality), Badal (revenge) and Nanawathe (accepting your wrong and begging for pardon).

    In as much as he has tried to confuse Pakhtoon culture with Islam and terrorism rather arab imperialism he has forgto to mention that Pakhtoon culture is secular in essence and has nothing to do with religion and the mess started when some forces (Pakistani establishment and Arabs) started interfering in Pashtoon culture in the name of religion in 1970s Afghanistan. The flames have finally engulfed the home and as much as we love Pakistan and want to save it with any mean avaliable, closing your eyes and hiding the fect won’t help, as it does so far the damage only. The root cause is islamization of Pashtoon society, which is didn’t accept and will not. If you destory the Hujra, then mosque will only survive with burning the famles around and that’s exactly whats happening.Recommend

  • Bangash
    Aug 16, 2010 - 8:32PM

    Some correction to author’s assertions, the Frontier Corps and tribal lashkars were sent into FATA in 2004, after Taliban had forcibly occupied the area and begun killing tribal maliks. The tanks only went in 2008, during Operation Zalzala, after it was realized that limited force, jirga and appeasement were not working in combating the Taliban.

    Author’s description of Kurram, where the Shias have been under assualt of the local Taliban for many years, as “traitors” is also peculiar.

    Author’s claim of different tribes helping each other against “enemy” has been disproven in operations in Bajaur, Swat, Buner, South Waziristan, where Taliban were left to fend for themselves by the tribesmen.

    Overall, it is the Taliban, powered by ideology, who have assaulted the tribal areas and occupied Pakistani territory, necessitating a military response from Pakistan. The tribesmen themselves hate the Taliban for bringing misery and destruction to their land.Recommend

  • NA
    Aug 17, 2010 - 8:30PM

    General David Patraeus, the top US commander in Afghanistan, has admitted in his recent interview with an American broadcaster that it’s a “Pakhtun insurgency”. If we still keep repeating the mantra of Islamic extremism or radicalism or any other “ism”, I think we are in a state of denial.Recommend

  • Bangash
    Aug 18, 2010 - 2:29AM

    General Petraeus is not operating in Pakistan, the Pakistani Taliban are powered by Wahibism mixed with barbarism and their primary victims have been the Pakhtuns of the northwest.

    I will repeat..the tribesmen of FATA hate the Taliban for bringing death and destruction. Only those living outside of Pakistan’s northwest still cling to romantic views of Taliban.Recommend

  • ADIL
    Aug 30, 2010 - 4:07PM

    Absolutely agreed with bangash.

    The article starts with the author’s opinion and failed to provide much analysis. If this is cultural backlash why were the Tribal maliks killed one by one by the taliban and why have the jirga which have always been considered sacrosanct been consistently attacked.

    Its about time that romantic view of taleban espoused by people such as the author and Imran Khan is shelved.Recommend

  • Dr.Ijaz Ali
    Sep 23, 2010 - 11:24AM

    I do not find any difference in the pakhtunwali of Saad and the author in terms of its essence. The writer has just elaborated a the term which is the need of the day. Bangash’s claim of wahabism in the tribal areas and afghanistan seems plausible as well in a historical context. Arbization has also been in a problem in these areas and some people even predicted that if there were no intervention, the fate of afghanistan would have been just like Tunisia, Morroco or some african countries. Several countries in African and in Arabia were arbaized though originally they are not arabs. Is it good or bad? true or false? whatever,lack of commitment to improve on things only leads to more chaos and i agree with the writer that over times, the insurgency has slightly shifted from just only relegious extremism to a broader ethnic unrest. In tribal areas, over the past 60 years, nothing has been undertaken for the improvement of education, health or other infrastructure. Travelling in these areas is just like a trip to the seventeenth century. The only infrastructure they have is the mansion of the political agent and a few bungalows built by smugglers. How can one think of killing these people for a sin they haven’t committed? If there were reforms in their legal status and education, they would have been different. These beautiful areas could have been heaven on earth for the tourists. Our inborn threat of being invaded by either eastern or western hostile nations has left us in shambles. For God sack do something to change the status of the tribal areas, otherwise fighting over there for a hundred years would prove a futile exercise.Recommend

More in KP & FATA

X