Pakistan recoiled to the position that the Nato supply route will reopen only after the US has apologised.
Obama speaking with Karzai of Afghanistan and President Zardari at the McCormick Place Convention Centre during the Nato summit. PHOTO: AFP
Pakistan has decided not to show its real hand at the Chicago Nato summit and has recoiled to the position taken earlier that the Nato supply route will reopen only after the US has apologised and retreated from its position of using drones inside Pakistani territory. The dramatic scene that some observers (worried about its increasing isolation) had hoped for — of Pakistan returning to the international fold by announcing the reopening — has not taken place.
President Asif Ali Zardari did not make a speech that could have earned him a standing ovation from the 60 heads of state. He was, perhaps, partially looking over his shoulder to Pakistan where the establishment is scared of the reaction that such a ‘capitulation’ will bring in its wake. Contrary to his endlessly supple approach to crises, he made reference to ‘respect’ as a sop to the rough public opinion inside Pakistan. But his real message was packed in what he said next: “The cabinet’s Defence Committee has decided to direct the relevant officials to conclude negotiations for resumption of the Ground Lines of Communication (GLOCS) needed to supply foreign troops in Afghanistan”.
The media back home has focused on the ‘snub’ that President Zardari received from US President Barack Obama for not giving in, ignoring that both presidents were going through a pantomime dictated by domestic politics. When the GLOCS are discussed in the coming days, Pakistan will apply all kinds of formulas to address its real concerns: reformulate the modalities of ‘apology’ and ‘drones’ and get a better deal from the Nato route which may have become a ‘once only’ option to counter the more expensive alternative ‘northern route’ that will isolate Pakistan even more.
No one should ignore that President Zardari also said “the foreign fighters and non-state actors seeking to destabilise Afghanistan and the region, if found on our soil, must be expelled”. He was recalling words used by Pakistan’s parliament while laying down the ground rules for the country’s foreign policy. What is remarkable is that he also explained in his speech why Pakistan was unable to remove the safe havens in North Waziristan which the world has been perceiving as Pakistan military’s plot to cause discomfiture to Nato in Afghanistan: “[Pakistan] would require the support of the international community, both in terms of resources and capacity-building. It will also require measures aimed at the economic well-being of the people of the areas affected by the military action”.
Nato Secretary-General Anders Fogh Rasmussen was clearly understanding when he said: “We did not anticipate an agreement on the Pakistan transit routes to be reached at this summit. That was not planned”. The summit declaration pointed to future progress on the matter of routes. It said: “The alliance expressed appreciation to Russia and Central Asian governments for allowing supply convoys through their territory while Nato continues to work with Pakistan to reopen the ground lines of communication as soon as possible.”
There are many reasons why Pakistan has been restrained at the Chicago Nato summit about the reopening of the Nato supply route but one powerful reason is the Defence of Pakistan Council (DPC) led by religious leaders and elements known as non-state actors. What is more dangerous is that the political parties opposed to the ruling coalition have lined up behind the DPC and are threatening their own protests, perhaps secretly appreciating the possibility that al Qaeda and the Taliban will oblige by attacking the supply route with suicide bombers.
Pakistan must come out of its internal contradictions perpetuated by terrorism and the compulsion of the national media of presenting a one-sided xenophobic picture for fear of getting their reporters killed. The world is puzzled by the behaviour of the government and military of Pakistan, falsely bitter towards the world and pusillanimous towards the elements that rob the state of its internal sovereignty.
Published in The Express Tribune, May 23rd, 2012.
on Twitter, become a fan on Facebook
A great editorial once again by the Ed. Instead of taking the blame all by itself, the elected govt does not want to repeat another Kerry-Lugar reaction from the establishment. Very correctly they left it to the people on the ground to work out the details! Kudos to the elected govt for making the right decision and not once again being used by the establishment like the aftermath of May 2.
Recommend
Agreed….. Totally………..
Recommend
Well Zardari played his political cards right.But the jury is out whether this will be good for Pakistan in the ling run. US and other nations including Russia (Russia isn’t going to forget Pakistan’s earlier role) have all the ammunition against Pakistan in terms of OBL, etc. to go after it. One more terror incident and even Chinese will not be able to speak on behalf of Pakistan which they have been doing. Ultimately Pakistan is going to succumb from the many pressures- economic, political, military. So why not do it the nice way now when eventually you will have to do it anyway ??????
Recommend
In other words, rather simple words, Pakistan is being blackmailed by DPC etc not to open NATO routes. Pakistan is yet to find ways of coming out of the blackmail and face the monsters it bred.
Recommend
great editorial.
Recommend
It would appear that the Editor like everyone else in Pakistan believes that Obama won’t apologize because it’s an election year. This sounds plausible but ignores that the USA has apologized to a similarly unpopular Afghanistan at least twice in the last few months. Perhaps Obama has more guts than you give him credit for. He’s a President who recently proclaimed support for gay marriage which isn’t popular in the USA and even less popular with blacks – I would argue that Obama believes that an unconditional apology isn’t warranted and that doing so would be a cowardly act.
Recommend
Leaders are in circled around the negotiation table with different ideas,
they are political leaders and doing politics.
Election are ahead in both the country,United States and Pakistan,chess is in center and players has been assembled around,new policies are framed every day for winning the game,
apology,ground supply routs,drones attacks has become central issues,all the game playing on it.
There is clear reluctance on offering apology ,there is clear stance on opening ground supply routs.
There is chances of non bridgeable distances between the two nuclear armed states,in case existing circumstances are continued it may lead to the point………point of no return.
Recommend
i dont know, may be this is where worst democracy is better than best dictatorship.
musharraf would have opened the supply route and would have snubbed all of us as fools who dont know anything, by now
Recommend
So you want the supply lines opened without any conditions or terms negotiated. Thats an American view and not shared by many in Pakistan. I m sorry for your lousy editorial.
Recommend
I think Obama has made a big mistake by slighting Pakistan & personally snubbing President Zardari who was an invited guest in Chicago. This mistake may win him a few brownie points now but it’ll make US Afghan exit more difficult, unless he makes amends by apologizing to Pakistan.
Pakistan has the trump card in the region because of its strategic location. It has the longest border with Afghanistan and wields more influence there than any other country. It also provides the nearest seaport to Kabul. That is the fundamental reason why the U.S. has provided more than $20 billion to the country over the past decade, much of it to ensure supply logistics to US troops. “If we want to be successful in Afghanistan,” as General James L. Jones Jr., former National Security Advisor to President Barack Obama, said in recent congressional testimony, “the roads to that success have a lot to do with Pakistan.” Given these ground realities, the sooner the US apologizes to Pakistan for the Nov 26 incident to try and restore ties, the better it will be to achieve an end to the longest war in US history.
http://www.riazhaq.com/2011/12/us-military-supply-logistics-in.html
Recommend
@Riaz Haq: I think the world committee is coming to the conclusion that carrots do not work with Pakistan. It is gradually shifting to the stick. The fact that the Senate subcommittee tied aid to reopening the route is a starting point. There will be more consequences as time goes by.
Recommend
Even if NATO supply is reopened, it’s safety can not be ensured by Pakistan.In such a situation it is better for NATO to use northern route.If NATO agrees to enhance the extortion money to Pakistan ,NATO has to pay more for northern route as that is longer.
Recommend