- RSS
- Today's Paper
- Subscribe
- beta 2.1
Alerts
US does not expect resolution of Nato supply route during Chicago summit
White House deputy National Security Advisor says there is no bilateral Zardari, Obama meeting scheduled.
No bilateral meeting, and no breakthrough over supply routes expected in Chicago. PHOTO: EXPRESS/FILE
CHICAGO: White House Deputy National Security Advisor Ben Rhodes said on Saturday that the US did not expect an agreement on the reopening of Nato supply routes through Pakistan to be completed over the weekend while the NATO Summit 2012 takes place.
With Nato extending an invitation to Pakistan to attend the meeting earlier in the week, and slew of ‘politically positive’ statements coming from Islamabad, it was expected that perhaps a deal would be struck before the Chicago moot got underway on Sunday.
However, as Rhodes travelled to Chicago, he told reporters that that there was no bilateral meeting scheduled between President Zardari and President Obama. He added that the only bilateral meeting the US President has scheduled is with the Afghan president Hamid Karzai. The frost between US and its chief ally in the War on Terror continues, for now.
According to a pool report, Rhodes said that negotiations for reopening the supply lines are ongoing. “We believe this is going to be resolved. We expect that to take some time. Based on the statements they’ve made, the negotiations going on, we believe it’s going to be accomplished. We’re not anticipating necessarily closing out those negotiations this weekend.”
On Friday, Pakistan had allowed four containers carrying office supplies for the US embassy in Kabul to cross over from Pakistan, onto the Afghan side of the Durand Line. This was the first consignment to make it through in six months after Pakistan had shut borders with Afghanistan after Nato airstrikes targeted a Pakistan check post and killed 24 soldiers with ‘friendly fire’.
Read more:
Natosummit
Reader Comments (15)
World Latest Stories
Four Americans killed in attack on Afghan base: US official
The deaths were caused by insurgent "indirect fire," either mortars or rockets, says the official
Afghan peace initiative: US, Taliban to open direct talks tomorrow
The Afghan militia also confirms it is opening a political office in Qatar.
Restricted mobility: ‘Reopen Pak-Afghan border’
Tribesmen say they cannot participate in family functions across the divide.
Pakistan welcomes announcement of Taliban office in Qatar
The Afghan Taliban opens its political office in Doha, Qatar on Tuesday.
Blazing trails: Australia and Pakistan
Australia will support new govt in its efforts of good governance, economic development as it faces challenges ahead.
Relief for Pakistan: Iran to waive penalty on delay in work
Minister hopes pipeline will be laid within the stipulated timeframe.
Mumbai Attacks' case: Pakistani panel cleared to cross-examine witnesses
An eight-member panel from Pakistan was earlier denied permission to cross-examine witnesses when it visited India.
Afghan forces take over security from NATO
Karzai pledged that Afghan forces were ready to take on insurgents.
US senator blocks Afghan aid, seeks info on cash payments
US senator demands information from Obama administration on "secret cash payments" to Afghan President Hamid Karzai.
Pakistan reacts strongly to Karzai's statement
Some institutions in Pakistan are opposed to promoting peace in Afghanistan, claims Afghan president.
Recent Slideshows
This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, redistributed or derived from.
Unless otherwise stated, all content is copyrighted © 2013 The Express Tribune News Network.
Technical feedback? [email protected]
If the US wants a resolution to this, they should talk directly to the army chief Kayani. Everybody knows who has the real powers in Pakistan. In fact Kayani was invited but he hid behind. Like after OBL’s killing the generals and ISPR have disappeared and hiding behind “all of a sudden elected parliament”. It were the generals and ISPR after Salala attack how have started this and were very vocal like against Kerry-Lugar Bill. In the same way they have disappeared from the scene with no talk of Salala Shaheed! The elected Govt should not take the full blame and learn from HH episode when he shamelessly supported the army role and Pakistan in the US, but what happened?
Recommend
The US should not expect any resumption of Nato supplies for a few more months. Sherry Rehman has been belicose on demands in the US and rehman Malik in Pakistan. Leaves little for Zardari to say.
Recommend
There is too much froth that does not make sense. Conflicting statements are coming from Nato and in Pakistan. Either it is a giant Topi Drama, or big time victory of Nato. Which is it?? ET get some of your men to tell us what really is going on and what role is HH playing???
Recommend
” friendly fire” ?? was it a friendly fire that put the relationship between two countries on lowest ebb and made pakistan block the supply line? friendly fire means killing allies? there are issues to be resolved before the supply line is restored..the foremost is the payment of 5000 USD/container..and the strong assurances that Salala incident will never be repeated again..well it is a good stand Pakistan took, let us see how long it can be maintained.
Recommend
@Qaiser Farooq:
The pakistani army fired first hence the incident.
Recommend
Bottom line for Pakistan is money.Recommend
@Qaiser Farooq: ‘friendly fire means killing allies?’
GHQ has admitted that that it supports Haqqani group and in turn the same group kills USA/NATO and Afghans. Would you call it ‘friendly fire means killing allies?.
Recommend
“US does not expect resolution of Nato supply route during Chicago summit”
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
US does expect resolution of Nato supply route during 2020.
Recommend
@Qaiser Farooq:
“…well it is a good stand Pakistan took, let us see how long it can be maintained.”
The more pertinent question is: Does Pakistan have the stamina to keep standing and play this Russian roulette? And what about post NATO withdrawal? How is Pakistan going to survive the harvest it is about to reap from its betrayal and duplicity?
Recommend
@Mirza:
I can understand your frustration for not opening the NATO route till now.
Recommend
“Friendly Fire”
Shame on ET for writing Friendly Fire for intentional killing of Pakistani solders.
Recommend
Vienna,May 20,2012
“Friendly fire” is caused by errors of judgment.Errors
on both sides as spelled out by the Americans after
investigating November 26 Salala events.Pakistan
insists it was because of the U.S duplicity!
Taravadu Taranga Trust for Media Monitoring TTTMM
–Kulamarva Balakrishna
Recommend
@Nasir:
What killed the remaining 4000 Pakistan soldiers? Unintentional killing by unfriendly fire or target practicing by bad Taliban?
Recommend
Why did Zardari travel to the Nato-Summit in Chicago, if he couldn’t have a bilateral talk with Obama? Was Zardari the right person to attend the meeting? Hasn’t Pakistan a more important role to play in the region than just blocking the supply route to Afghanistan?
Recommend
It looks supply route was not that big a card. Closing of these routes has not caused a ripple in Washington.US will probably bring a dispute against Pakistan and manuevre a decision in their favour.After all an apology has no legal basis . Pakistan should have sought compensation which the norm in international law.
Recommend