- 08 Apr 2012
Bilawal can't even speak Urdu properly, Imran chides - 12 Apr 2012
Notice taken?: Chief justice seeks record of Zardari, Bilawal speeches - 04 Apr 2012
ZA Bhutto’s ‘judicial murder’: In scorching speech, Bilawal asks apex court to apologise - 03 Apr 2012
We expect SC to apologise for role it played in murder of ZAB: Bilawal
- RSS
- Today's Paper
- Subscribe
- beta 2.1
Alerts
Notice taken?: Chief justice seeks record of Zardari, Bilawal speeches
Court alerted of anti-judiciary speeches made on ZA Bhutto death anniversary
Court alerted of anti-judiciary speeches made on ZA Bhutto death anniversary PHOTO: REUTERS
ISLAMABAD: Chief Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry has directed the relevant section of the Supreme Court to furnish before him records of speeches made last week by President Asif Ali Zardari and Pakistan Peoples Party (PPP) co-chairman Bilawal Bhutto Zardari on the occasion of Zulfikar Ali Bhutto.
The hard-hitting speeches in question openly cast doubts and criticised the judiciary in general and the Supreme Court in particular – particularly the one by the PPP’s young co-chairman during a meeting of the party’s Central Executive Committee in Naudero.
Sources said a note was submitted to the Chief Justice based on press clipping regarding the speeches, on which Justice Chaudhry directed the concerned section in the apex court to furnish a complete record before him.
Sources in the Supreme Court, however, said that it was a routine matter as the Chief Justice usually seeks more information about important issues when a file is put before him. However, on many occasions, such records serve as catalysts for suo motu notice on important issues.
Two PPP leaders – the prime minister himself as well as Senator Babar Awan – are already facing contempt proceedings.
Published in The Express Tribune, April 12th, 2012.
Reader Comments (39)
Pakistan Latest Stories
Is Lahore ready for the modern world?
Impact of internet, mobile phones on improved quality of life.
Top stories May 19-26, 2013: PTI vs MQM
Don't miss the top stories of the week on The Express Tribune website.
Anti-anxiety pills in Pakistan: Mama’s little helper
Many women, men in Pakistan don’t think twice about taking addictive anti-anxiety pills rather than seeing a doctor.
Arbab Ghulam Rahim's PPML merges with PML-N
Decision taken during Rahim’s meeting with Shahbaz Sharif in Lahore.
Delivering on promises: PTI forms committee to assist provincial govt
Coordination committee will give advice on various development plans to be executed according to the manifesto.
Upper Dir: Four policemen injured in IED explosion
Militant killed, constable injured in search operation.
Eliminating threats: Huge supply of explosives seized in Jamrud
The truck was en route to Landikotal from Peshawar.
Shift in power: Can JUI-S bring the Taliban to the table?
Initial attempts to establish contact with Samiul Haq signify policy shift in the government's approach to Taliban.
April 16 blast: Victim pins hope on incoming govt for promised compensation
The attack was aimed at ANP leaders, Iqbal was just in the wrong place at the wrong time.
Timely action: Low-intensity bomb defused in Hangu Bazaar
BDS official says 700 grammes of explosives were used in the bomb.
Recent Slideshows
This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, redistributed or derived from.
Unless otherwise stated, all content is copyrighted © 2013 The Express Tribune News Network.
Technical feedback? [email protected]
What we need are Hanging Judges as they had in Good old England. Certain judges were known for giving maximum punishment for a crime they were hearing. If it was a Hanging Matter then so be it. They also finalized their case expeditiously. So when one heard that their case was to be heard by so and so judge, they knew what their fate was going to be and were eager to finalize their wills and end of life matters. We too should have Judges know as Hanging Judge. In Pakistan some may pass away even before a Hearing comes up. Baby says, “that should reduce the pressure on the system, don’t you think.”
Recommend
When will common sense prevail over these monarchs. Aitzaz Ahsan is proving to be more destructive than Baber Awan.
Recommend
They use pictures of Salman Taseer while no PPP leader was supporting Taseer’s stance when he was alive. Playing politics with the blood of martyrs.
Recommend
It’s unfortunate to see a potential future leader of Pakistan do such a thing – this hypocrisy must end.
Recommend
So where did he graduate from? Oxford? Really?
Recommend
Junior quoted the Vienna Convention in his speech. I did not get what in the Vienna Convention gave his daddy the immunity to act in impunity?? Mi Lord The CJ should ask him that. He is studying Bar-at-law and should know what he is talking about. I think Allah is going to bless us with Mini-Me of Austin Powers fame.
Recommend
The PPP and its allies should hold a massive public gathering and everybody should read out loud what most already say. The judicial murder of ZAB is shameful and the SC has a chance to right the wrong but it is going in the opposite direction. How many people can these PCO judges put in jail? There is no freedom of speech when it comes to the SC judges, they are the sacred cows with big egos but ignominious history.
Recommend
Let them face the music. Enough of listening to their martyrdom stories.
Recommend
It looks like our Chief Justice do not have any other work to do.
Recommend
Another day, another notice. yawn
Recommend
We do not need educated and brainless leaders, we need sincere leadership, only!
Recommend
of all the hatred i have for the current setup, i think the courts are overreacting now.
Recommend
Seems like our Chief Justice is afraid of taking any action against elite culprits..
Recommend
PCO judges have no credibility.
Recommend
@Asad:
You are a selfish individual. The CJ has more contribution to Pakistan than the whole of PPP itself.
Recommend
If all public officials are subject to criticism, I don’t understand why Judiciary should be different!
Contempt of court should only be used when someone stops the process of justice or subverts it. For mere criticism of judges, judgements or even the functioning of courts, Judiciary shouldn’t use contempt proceedings. It undermines freedom of voicing one’s opinion.
I am perfectly within my right to say “In my opinion Judiciary of Pakistan is no good”, just as I can say “Judiciary of Pakistan is good”. Both are opinions.
However, Judiciary will be right in prosecuting any official for not carrying out a judicial order, as that undermines the judicial process. Prime Minister included.
Recommend
no need to bother – knows what he is son of ‘all powerful person in this country’.
Recommend
Bored of hearing all these nonsenses! We need Army takeover…
Recommend
hahah – given the time SC spends on these issues it seems to me Pakistan has ZERO crime and Law breaking.
Recommend
Bilawal is chairman of PPP i think not co-chairman
Recommend
@Mirza:
Freedom of speech does not equals to lying through teeth
Recommend
I have been expecting this, it will turn out to be a suo moto action!
Recommend
@Kaisar
Bilawal is co-chairman of PPP with Asif Zardari
Recommend
It’s obvious from the comments that PPP supporters don’t know the meaning of contempt – blinded by power.
I pray I never have to see this government again, literally!
Recommend
All Politics of course chief Justice is scared thats why this Gillani & his Son cases are just getting forwarded by dates nothing is actually being done .
They are just trying to make us Citizens MAD
Recommend
Law is Law, every one has to follow, be it a president or his son…!!!
I can see people here are still in favour of there favourite politicians, by closing there eyes.
Please let the rule of law stablish, if you really care for this country.
Keep doing your dirty politics, but dont make fun of the law.
Let all the people live peacefuly…..
Recommend
The SC by its actions and Political leanings is reinforcing international belief that it is a kangaroo Court. Asking for PM and Presidents speeches anywhere by Courts could be grounds for impeachment because it can be construed as an coup against Democracy.
Seems like there is a change in the 3M coalition, now it is Military, Mullah and Munsiff.
May God save the country from the troika !
Recommend
“We want the democratic process to continue, and that too by our party. And in the due process, we wouldn’t tolerate any objection to our actions whether the country falls down to a deep deep crisis!”. Isn’t this what they mean when criticize judiciary? We all know that incapable managers get fired, so why can’t they be? Somebody here, mention a single good that these people have done to the country? And please don’t mention that they have had lots of sacrifices etc.etc.
Recommend
It’s seems we have another zardari in the making…no respect for courts and even less for the law…and every one wants to study it nevertheless.
Recommend
Courts are not supposed to be run on emotions/hurt feelings. Judges are supposed to be very impersonal in their actions as one intention of making laws is to remove the occurrence of emotional and personal judgments.
That’s why if it actually reaches the courtroom the first thing you’re going to see is a request for a change of venue.
Recommend
I was really dejected to hear Bilawal’s speech,
where he was taunting the judges avd also
laying a ethnic tension.
Bilawal seriously needs a mentor.
Recommend
@ Mirza, If you are so concerned about ZAB judicial murder case, why is your party not apoointing a replacement of Babar Awan so that SC can proceed ahead with the reference hearing. Just learn to blame the right ones.
Recommend
truth is bitter PCO judges
Recommend
@BilloRani:
Yes indeed. He did graduate from Oxford. And the person he is talking about is the first elected Prime Minister of this country, First Leader of the house, that gave unanimously passed constitution, and the First and the ONLY Prime Minister murdered by your favorite Judiciary. Now provoke this biased PCO CJP to hold him in contempt, apply article 6 and hand him the capital punishment. Repeat history, people like you and your beloved judiciary is in the habit of.
Recommend
@Blithe:
And I suppose you’ll do the job :D
Recommend
Contempt of court clauses have often been misused in Pakistan in the past to stifle free speech and mute criticism of the court. While the judges may sit in judgement of finer points of law, they need to steer clear from any attempts to silence free speech which is a God-given constitutional right. The people of Pakistan have a right to disagree with the judgements of the judges, we have a right to criticize or appreciate the decisions of the court; we pay the perks and privileges of the judges who are public servants.
No one, including the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court, or the four star Generals, is above criticism. President Obama also criticizes the decisions of the US Supreme Court but they do not get insecure about his criticism nor serve him contempt notices. Learn about judicial restraint and to conduct yourself in civilized and dignified manner.Recommend
Although Bilawal seems like the co chairman but he is infact the chairman of the PPP so please make the correction in your article.
Recommend
Lot of hot air!—-what’s this nonsense about ‘contempt’ of court or a judge/s? They are just people and must always remember without any hubris that they have a job for a while and must do it without any sense self-importance and don’t mix up themselves with the interest of the court and the people who created these courts and constitution and legal system. Humility does it!
Recommend
Where is equality of religion where all humans are equal and even a ruler could be criticized directly and he had to explain that he is innocent? The equality disappears when it comes to generals and the generals who endorse their rule without fail.
Recommend