Taken in isolation, there is nothing particularly objectionable about the decision to bulldoze Osama bin Laden’s compound in Abbottabad. Whatever intelligence was to be found there would have been extracted months ago and there was always the danger that supporters of Bin Laden would begin to treat the compound as hallowed ground. Even though the government would likely have had to raze the compound anyway, the move is disappointing because it shows the skewed priorities of the government and the military. At a time when we still don’t know how he was hiding in a city with significant military presence for so long, the decision to destroy his house is fraught with symbolic significance. The house may well have been given to Bin Laden for strategic reasons, but that is a suspicion that may never be proven because of the distinct lack of curiosity everyone displays whenever the question comes up.
Coincidentally, the Abbottabad compound was destroyed around the same time WikiLeaks released the hacked internal emails of private intelligence firm Stratfor. One of the emails showed that Stratfor believed that Bin Laden was being sheltered by the Pakistani military, which the latter, however, has always vehemently denied. This on its own doesn’t come anywhere near being a smoking gun but there are enough unanswered questions about the military’s role to warrant serious investigation. The ideal venue for that would have been the commission set up to investigate the May 3 raid. Unfortunately, the commission ignored the central question of Osama’s comfortable presence in the country, proving its existence as a colossal waste of time and resources.
The fact is that the military has time and again proved to exist outside the ambit of accountability. The commission that was supposed to find the killer of journalist Saleem Shahzad was unable to come up with a name, which was no surprise since the intelligence agencies were the prime suspects. Now, the military has struck another blow in favour of its invincibility, by ensuring that any investigation of its possible role in either actively helping Osama or turning a blind eye to his presence here has gone up in smoke.
Published in The Express Tribune, March 1st, 2012.
COMMENTS (7)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ
If the presence of OBL in Abbottabad, a garrison town, is not a smoking gun, I wonder what is. It is inconceivable that he lived there for such a long time and the pakistani intelligence did not have an inkling about it. And this in a country where the agencies do such a marvelous job of keeping regular tabs on journalists in places far far away from Pakistani military establishment. No matter how much the Pakistan establishment tries, this is not the end of the matter.
You can' erase shame by knocking down a building -- you need to find and punish those responsible for hiding/abetting OBL.
I dont understand what is the need to demolish.
A truly Golden Business Opportunity lost!!! There would have been thousands of rich American (and indeed global) tourists willing to pay $10,000 each to get a conducted tour inside the house, with even mock-up SEALs and OBL play re-enacted!!!
1000 rich visitors daily each paying $10,000 works out to $10 million DAILY. With all-year (365-day) operation, this would have generated annual revenues of $3.65 Billion USD!!!!
I can't help but agree considering just about the whole thing is things I've wanted to say but simply didn't have the patience to.
Razing the OBL compound is rewriting history. It is like pressure washing the murder scene of BB. The custom made safe haven might have scape tunnels so the strategic asset can be moved on a short notice. However, nothing would come out now. The truth is buried with the rubble. Did the Abbottabad Commission order the destruction or it was done despite it being in session?