Tomorrow, February 27, is the tenth anniversary of the violence in Gujarat. In March of 2002, the Editors Guild of India sent a three-man team to investigate the role of the media in the riots. The team comprised of BG Verghese, Dileep Padgaonkar and myself.
We filed a report whose finding was that much of the local (Gujarati language) media was prejudiced against Muslims. It played not an insignificant role in keeping the violence going. The tone that newspapers should have adopted during a period of violence was found rarely, and sometimes there was also incitement. All this was fine with its readership, and these papers have since thrived.
Two aspects to the violence in Gujarat have stayed with me.
The first was the understanding that a riot happens in India when the state steps aside. This happens willfully, because the administration sees benefit in allowing the violence to continue. The reason for this is that often the political party in power during a riot is rewarded with a return to power if elections are around the corner. The former bureaucrat Harsh Mander said that the British had left us a system of neighbourhood policing through which law and order could be imposed within 48 hours. That this had not happened in two of Gujarat’s cities, Ahmedabad and Baroda, indicated that the state was complicit.
The second reason for the state to step aside is when its constituent elements, by which is meant the police force, the administrators, the district magistrates and the judiciary, are part of the same civil society that is violent. They take sides in the violence without instruction from above. There is reason to believe that the latter happened in Gujarat in 2002. We can speculate this because the Supreme Court moved some riot cases out of Gujarat and to the Bombay High Court. There is reason to believe that the deliberate withholding of the state’s ability to stop violence happened also, but to me that is the less disturbing element. Once the administration signals its passiveness, normalcy leaves the neighbourhoods and the killing begins.
The second aspect was the participation of civil society in the violence. The state could have prevented the rioters, true. But why were Gujaratis killing Gujaratis in the first place? This difficult question must be confronted. This role of civil society and media in the violence is the single most important fact of this and all other Indian riots.
The reason given here was provocation. That is to say, if the train had not been set alight in Godhra by Muslims, the killing across the state would not have happened. This justifies collective punishment and civic violence. If one is unable to accept this reasoning, then it is difficult to move on from the savagery.
I was struck by a couplet in a poem Bollywood lyricist Gulzar wrote on the riots: “Sar nahin katey they, topiyan kati thi ke jin mein sar they” (They didn’t cut off heads, they merely cut off caps in which heads were present).
Ten years after the riots, we in India soothe ourselves with the thought that the violence has not recurred. But whether the state and its constituents will behave differently next time, and whether the population will be less wrathful are questions that lurk, and will not go away easily.
There was one aspect to the events in Gujarat that was not immediately obvious.
This was the first communal riot where the violence was shown live on television, over an entire week. This made the event transformational. More people (2,700) were killed during the riots in Delhi in 1984 after Indira Gandhi’s murder and more again (over 2,000) in 1992-93, after the demolition of the Babri mosque. In Gujarat 790 Muslims and 253 Hindus were killed, and about 250 more are missing, presumed dead. Despite the smaller number, the impact of the Gujarat riots was deeper than the previous two because of television. The violence was shown in a vivid manner, and the bestiality was remembered. It has produced a fiercely secular national media in India that has pushed Hindutva back in the last decade.
Published in The Express Tribune, February 26th, 2012.
COMMENTS (46)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ
1713509570-0/Taylor-Swift-Album-Release-(1)1713509570-0-270x192.webp)
The lessons from Gujarat 2002: 1. A Democratically elected govt. isn't always right. 2. People do vote on xenophobic consideration, even when they are in majority & should feel safe 3. Leaders like NaMo focusing on Guj votes, will get weighed down by Gujarat 2002 4. India is too complex and diverse country for a single virulent, extreme ideology to spread 5. With all Extremist Hindutva push, BJP can win Gujarat. But, it'll loose India. 6. People of India have learnt how cynical politicians can exploit situations. Many bomb blasts, terror incidents after 2002, didn't revoke an backlash and a riot.
Hopefully People of India have matured.
As an Indian, I feel ashamed by what happened in Gujrat 2002. I know it counts for little, still I beg forgiveness to all those whose life were affected one way or the other by and because of the evil deeds of those who have no respect for humanity. Hope and pray justice will be done.
At the same time, I am proud of the Indian media (both print and electronic variety), many NGOs and a horde of intellectuals,op-ed writers,social workers and individuals who has worked and todate working towards a reconcilliation and justice.
Lessons from the riots in Gujarat? 1.Democracy is not mobocracy. 2.Democracy is not merely a 'rule by majority', far less of a 'rule of majority' and certainly not 'tyranny of the majority'. (It might take most of us,Indians and Pakistanis as well, another couple of hundred years to understand the nuances.) 3.Rule of law and a fair (and robust) justice system is the way forward.
Hate to see fanatical Hindus spreading misinformation in a Pakistani newspaper. Godhra train burning was done by Hindu fanatics themselves. It is a fact proven in court investigations. And Gujarat is a prison for Muslims with literally no opportunities. Go take your shining India slogans elsewhere.
Mr Akhar Patel has spoken the truth which is unlikely to most of the Indians.He is the man of integrity. He has written irrespective of religion.
http://www.indiatribune.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=2105&Itemid=524
here's to east pakistan, kashmir and gujrat..
@Zalim singha I understand one thing man in india and pakistan any area is prospers is just because of that area peoples working over seas and sending money its can be Gujrath or tamil nado or Hazara and mir pur kashmir or Mandi bahudin Gujrath Punjab nothing else and second thing some lucky peoples only makes 80 lakhs working in india and pakistan and by luck u got that job the is not Modi extremist and i have many friend who are working in oil firms and and even in textile industry making one lakh a months.
If our Truth Seeker would have been in India then my guess is that there would have been many more riots until either Mr. Truth Seeker goes down or people get tired of riots.
@Indian: "Almost all the news channels are showing documentaries on guj riot on tv in the last 2-3 days. perhaps it’s a good thing to do. It is reminding people of grave long term consequences." What "grave" consequences are you talking of, Indian? If anything, it galvanized Gujratis behind Narendra Modi in every election and Narendra Modi was able to deliver a governance every state in the Union is envious of.
@Zalim singh: "Izraelis never committed any cimres against palestine people. The palestines who make a living in Israel are quite ok and have no complains." No wonder you chose "Zalim" moniker for yourself as the rest of the world is sobbing over the miseries of Palestinians. I guess your 8 millions come from an Israeli outfit. What a change of Indians' heart from Palestinians to Israelis.
@BlackJack: "the only time in post-independence history of the subcontinent that tens of thousands of innocent people have been eliminated in an organized pogrom was Operation Searchlight." I thought it was Operation Blue Star (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OperationBlueStar) and subsequent massacre of 5,000+ Sikhs in 1984 (Please check the actual figures at the above link). Let's not talk about the genocide of tens of thousands of Kashmiri Muslims during past 2 decades.
@P N Eswaran: "When the capacity to self-introspect is absent folly appears as wisdom. The demand for ‘separate homeland’ was Pakistan. While reserving my comment on the ‘wisdom’ of such a demand I am glad that this has done immense good to India." You seem quite confused in your thinking. You are glad for something, and at the same time having reservations and think it a folly. Don't understand if you are really happy or not.
The number of dead in Gujarat Riot is rather accurately summarized by various NGOs, and press outside of Gujrat. There is no need to quibble on those numbers.
The question isn't about how many died, it is Why they had to die at all? The shame of Gujarat 2002, and many other such violence where numbers may have been less, is more than the fact that innocent people were killed.It is the fact that 50+ years after independence, we were still focused on silly issues like religion & caste divides and would kill each other.
Only ray of hope is post 2002, there hasn't been instances of violence that lasted long. But, some flare ups still happen. The divide still persists. India will be a true developed country when everyone considers themselves Indians and are bound by same vision, aspiration for combined well being.
To that extent, I hope Narendra Modi/BJP will never win an election again, till he apologizes for the insult to our nationhood that was Gujarat 2002, just as Congress apologized for 1984.
@Truth Seeker: I don't agree with G. Din, but you need to do some more truth-seeking my friend - the only time in post-independence history of the subcontinent that tens of thousands of innocent people have been eliminated in an organized pogrom was Operation Searchlight.
@G. Din: "punishment shall be wholly disproportionate to the provocation...." You have already proved that. In case of Sikhs, 5,000+ lives for 1 Hindu life; and, through out India 100,000+ Muslims for a few Hindus.
@G. Din: "One need not squirm and be apologetic about it." Only an Indian could have the courage to say that, after killing tens of thousands of innocent people.
@G. Din: "If “only” 790 Muslims died in those riots, you can bet many more will die the next time." I guess you are referring to the extermination of 790,000+ Kashmiri Muslims, or 5000+ Punjabi Sikhs.
@Truth Seeker: @Thinktank: “Why does everybody forget ( including aakar Patel) that minority community should always act in the goodwill of majority? “
Only now, I fully understand the wisdom behind the demand for a separate homeland for Muslims. Until before, I thought we had the same blood lines. Thank you Mr. Thinktank.
When the capacity to self-introspect is absent folly appears as wisdom. The demand for 'separate homeland' was Pakistan. While reserving my comment on the 'wisdom' of such a demand I am glad that this has done immense good to India.
@John B: I slightly disagree with your thesis that media doesn't change psyche of the society. Media might not create the trend itself, but it does amplify a trend. The key evidence of it is that convergence of human behavior in the last few decades is directly proportional to the increase in information flows. However, I agree that media is a sub-set of society and therefore reflects deeper emotional under-currents and fears prevalent in a society.
@Aakar Patel: It is naive to believe that the post-Godhra riots were purely spontaneous with no deep-seated ill-feeling behind them - and as with typical mobs, once the shackles are broken, the animal within then runs amok. I disagree with your congratulatory note on the role of visual media (esp English) which has always been anti-Hindutva (or fiercely secular - what's in a name?) and comes with fairly rigid points of view - they only reinforce opinions in those viewers who already think on similar lines. Visibility of the carnage during those few days is not the factor that keeps Gujarat in the spotlight (relatively), but the last 6-7 years of relentless Modi bashing by the establishment to remove a (possible) contender (while I agree that he probably turned a Nelson's eye to the violence). It is also simplistic to say that riots are successful only with state connivance - in that case the Govts in Maharashtra and AP (Congress) were also hand-in-glove with the rioters after the Babri Masjid demolition? Further, the point about Govts coming back to power shortly after riots is incorrect - in Maharashtra, the Shiv-Sena BJP have wrested and retained the Mumbai corporation ever since the Bombay riots (they also won the next state elections). In AP, the TDP came to power in the next (1994) election (I don't see any correlation btw).
@Thinktank: "Why does everybody forget ( including aakar Patel) that minority community should always act in the goodwill of majority? " Only now, I fully understand the wisdom behind the demand for a separate homeland for Muslims. Until before, I thought we had the same blood lines. Thank you Mr. Thinktank.
Whatever happened was not good for society .If train was not burnt , then this thing wouldn't have happened .We should always find out the root cause of everything .Booming state of Gujarat is the most peaceful state of country , thanks to its trading community and gov .The Muslims who were brainwashed to fire the train couldn't guess the consequence . Due to some handful Muslims , other innocent Hindus and Muslims suffer .Again after some days , Akshar Dham temple was attacked by Islamic terrorists .But this Islamic violence is not new to state of Gujarat, thanks to its its history of Ghanznavi .It is the people of Gujarat ,its forward looking youths,business-savvy mindset , pragmatic people like Gandhi who has made this state pride of country.
@Zaid Hamid:
How come you always get the "facts" wrong?????
It was a truly tragic event in Indian history, like the demolition of Babri Masjid, and lessons from it have been learnt. What is taking time is the punishing of those responsible. The delay is shameful, but Justice will surely be done one day. The biggest suspect (all know who) is already squeamishly sweating under the collar.
Why does everybody forget ( including aakar Patel) that minority community should always act in the goodwill of majority? By burning innocent women and children alive, they lost all the goodwill. And had to face the consequences .... Passsive role of government had very little to do with the outburst...
The State cannot adopt an attitude of "see nothing do nothing", whatever the reason for spark turning into a fire. Gujerat has moved on to become India's most Investor friendly state, they are the most enterprising people. Gujerat is well on its way to eliminate poverty in another 5 years. Modi's message is clear, keep your religion at home I will make conditions conducive for making money. Today every Industrialist and Businessman wants to go t his state and invest because he favours progress over Politics. Every Politician including his own party men in BJP hate him as few can match his record in development.
Dear Aaker Patel,
Keep up the good work you have been very correct. @John B
You do sound to be genuine American, cos your perception is neither Indian hindu or muslim nor Pakistani and therefore naive, not baised
"Every action has Opposite and equal reaction". Would there been no Train burning in Godhra,There would not any riot in Gujrat. And This Riot got huge coverage bcose of "SICKULAR" Congress govt in Cente and "COMMUAL" BJP in State,not bcause of Television or Media as Congress is afraid of Modi and know that only he has capacity to end Nehru Dynastical rule from India.
Why dont u guys just say straight and clear that Anti muslims BJP terrorist Modi is sole responsible for this killing and hate and secular indian Gujrathis still chose him in election what a shame guys when truth come u hide him what a clever. even america did not issued him visa even though his crime is equals to izraelis crimes against palestinean.
Standing with the Oppressed is standing with truth and Justice. Those who stood with the Truth and Justice , they never die. They are kept alive in the history & they are loved across the nations of the world regardless of their own Religion, cast or creed. This is how the magic with siding with oppressed works. Keep Standing with the unfortunates Mr. Aakar. Honor and respect is none, but yours.
Zaid Hamid : That must have been during the WOT in pakistan. I am glad this author highlights the hindus killed also.
These 3 big riots in the last 3 decades still haunts secular India very hard.In fact many people question it's secular credentials just on the basis of it. Thanks to the media that it has kept it alive . Almost all the news channels are showing documentaries on guj riot on tv in the last 2-3 days. perhaps it's a good thing to do. It is reminding people of grave long term consequences. secularism does not mean that there won't be any conflict. but it means that state will not discriminate on the basis of religion. Certainly after 2002 we have been successful in avoiding any major conflict except one or two abe-rrations. For such a highly diverse society it's a good achievement.
20000 Muslims were killed while none of the hindus were touched .. that is a fact.
@ ex Gujju Does it matter that much whether it was 790 or 2000? Anyway this figure of 2000 is the un-official figure ( http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/1977246.stm ) Un-official reports (including one by the British High Commission, and one by the Human Rights Watch, and acc to Indian peace activist and journalist Cedric Prakash) put death toll around 2000 with the major chunk being the Muslims. (see Wikipedia's page on Gujarat Riots).
Communal riots always have an underlying current and theme and it takes two to tango.
The last communal riots post Rodney King acquittal in the US, the last one in Detroit some time back and the recent one in UK all had different flavors but sparked with the same current of superiority Vs persecution. Who is persecuted victim depends on whom you ask. China claims Buddhists monks are initiating communal riots in Tibet.
I disagree with the author that states play a role in initiating communal riots. Often, the states enter communal riots later in law and order and the state machinery is always blamed by both sides once the dust settles down.
Contrary to the authors view the media never change the society's attitude. It is the self awakening of society's sensibility in response to the events that changes the future course of events. If media had such an influence on creating secular sensibilities, one would not expect a present carnage in Kabul following the Quran burning, because Kabul just had one last year following Terry Jones episode. Conversely, one should expect similar riots in Egypt, Iran, Saudi Arabia, India or in US. The media never brought the changes but the society did, always.
The Indian media should ask the fair and honest question. Why there is communal tension between these two religions, while none between Muslims and others(at least in recent past) or between Hindus and others, and why such riots happen in pockets of India and not in other places. If any, one should have expected old Delhi and New Delhi or Hyderabad to go up in flames in Ayodya fiasco or Gujarat riots, but that did not happen. Why?
Is it fair to brand them all in two polarized groups or will appeasing the victim of one riot help in alleviating the problem in the future?
Neither the Hindu nor the Muslim culprits of Gujarat riots are saints. As said earlier, it takes two to tango. If only Hindus are that bad, then in Pakistan we should be expecting peace and tranquility and carnage in India.
It has become a fashion to be politically correct in todays world to blame others whenever the "Muslims" are victimized. The truth of the matter is there are two separate groups of people call themselves as Muslims. Read the accompanying column " Why Muslims kill Muslims ". Interestingly, Muslims identify these two groups easily, whereas others don't know how to distinguish them, and become victim of self persecution in doing the right thing.
@ex Gujju: If "only" 790 Muslims died in those riots, you can bet many more will die the next time. Such incidents follow a certain logical progression. One need not squirm and be apologetic about it. The problem is not how many died but the mindset that provides the provocation for those killings in the first place. What Godhra demonstrated was that Hindus will not take it on the chin any more and that there will be an inevitable retaliation and the punishment shall be wholly disproportionate to the provocation provided for very good reasons.
Aakar, you say "But whether the state and its constituents will behave differently next time, and whether the population will be less wrathful are questions that lurk, and will not go away easily."
I think the question was answered unambiguously 8 months after the Gujarat riots. 59 people were killed in Akshardham temple in Gujarat later in 2002. The state acted swiftly and there was NO retaliation.
Mr. Patel, we also need more people like you in Pakistan who have the courage to speak the truth and tell the public as it is, not what the the authorities want us to hear while concealing the whole truth.
What's the point of writing this peace in a newspaper of Islamic Republic of Pakistan?
Dear Aakar, at least you article would inform Pakistani readers, who are always claiming that 2000+ Muslims died in riots of 2002 that actual no. was 790. Also aren't Ahmadabad and Baroda called Amdavad and Vadodara now?
The madness that engulfed Gujarat in 2002 was perhaps a spontaneous violent eruption of outrage which had been simmering in that land since probably the first time the Somnath Temple was demolished(it was rebuilt 17 times).There's a limit to humiliations that a community can tolerate.The people who burnt that train carrying women and children played right into the hands of the hindutva forces.Let's hope the communal violence bill is passed to prevent such incidents from repeating.