Share this article
Print this page
Email a friend
- RSS
- Today's Paper
- Subscribe
- beta 2.0
High: 33°C
Low: 27°C
Alerts
Ulema played a huge role in creation of Pakistan: Shahbaz Sharif
Punjab chief minister was addressing Seerat-un-Nabi conference in Lahore.
Punjab chief minister was addressing Seerat-un-Nabi conference in Lahore. PHOTO: APP/FILE
LAHORE: The ulema (religious leaders) played a huge role in the creation of Pakistan and they made several sacrifices under the Quaid-e-Azam’s leadership, said Punjab Chief Minister Shahbaz Sharif on Saturday.
Sharif was addressing a Seerat-un-Nabi conference in Lahore to commemorate the birth anniversary of Prophet Muhammad (PBUH).
The minister said that there was no leader in the entire history who helped the spread of Islam and the concept of equity around the world other than the Prophet (PBUH).
“Now, there are millions and billions of Muslims living everywhere – from Casa Blanca all the way to Kuala Lumpur,” he said.
Reader Comments (46)
Latest News
Shaheen Air: Fuel tank leak leaves passengers stranded
Officials say remaining passengers will either be sent to Karachi on another plane or will be directed to go home.
Bullet-riddled body of journalist found in Turbat
Express News correspondent Razzaq Gul had been kidnapped on Friday evening.
INTEL-ISEF 2012: Pakistanis take home prize at world's largest science fair
Mahnoor Hassan, Shiza Gulab and Bushra Shahed of Institute of Computer and Management Sciences take 4th prize.
Intel Isef: 3 Pakistani students make it to finals
Five finalists were named in Pakistan, but only three obtained a visa.
Italy "dog and cat tax" muzzled after uproar
The only thing that's left to tax are wives and children, says parliamentarian.
Recent Slideshows
This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, redistributed or derived from.
Unless otherwise stated, all content is copyrighted © 2012 The Express Tribune News Network.
Technical feedback? webmaster@tribune.com.pk
Stop distorting the facts Mr. Sharif. These ‘ulema’ are the same people who used to call Ali Jinnah ‘Kafir-e-Azam’ and Pakistan as ‘Napakistan”. I wouldn’t call that playing a huge role.
And regarding the last point, it is bound to happen when you have an absolute monopoly in the marketplace of ideas and ideology in Muslim countries.
Recommend
Hmm , is not a patronizing speech.
He should have used the opportunity to address the role the Ulema in changing times and how it can function as a constructive force.
Recommend
The issue today is not who created Pakistan, it is who destroyed it. Pakistan people do not have the basic civic amenities. It is surviving on aid. Instead of a prosperous peaceful country it has become a center of terrorism. WHY ?. Was that the dream of Qaid-e-Azam. Today all see is destruction of minorities, was this the dream of Qaide-e-Azam. It is time for retrospection.
Recommend
the love that the punjab government harbors for these so called religious leaders. protecting them from the law, giving them monthly stipends when they are detained for terrorist activities!
Recommend
These were Ulmas who gathered the Muslims for separate homeland but the entire credit goes to the pocket of Quaid-e-Azam who never went to jail for the achievement of Muslim country. Ulemas were tortured, killed and several were put behind bars by the British Raj. It is really a conspiracy against religion and religious people to undermine their role in the creation of pakistan.
Recommend
@saleem:
Chief minister Shahbaz needs to check his facts. The so called Ulema actually opposed Pakistan. Their contributions for Pakistan are zero. Their role today is regressive as they think they have monopoly over religion. Frankly, the society would be better off without them.
Recommend
Pandering to the religious lot comes across as not only being ‘ in bad taste ‘ but shows signs of weakness. The Shareef brothers have simply ‘ lost the plot ‘.
Recommend
What a distortion of history.. MashaAllah.
Recommend
Now they will issue certificate of patriotism.
Recommend
Everyone knows this ! Say something different Mr. Shareef.
Recommend
I am a history buff so I know who supported Pakistan and who didn’t.
The Jamaat-e-Islami, Majlis-e-Ahrar (precursor to Khatme-Nabuwat) and the Deobandi Ulema in general opposed Pakistan.
The only Deobandi to support Pakistan was Maulana Shabbir Ahmed Usmani who was a mid level figure in the Deobandi leadership circle.
The only two religious groups to give their full support to Pakistan were Ahmadi’s and Aga Khani’s. Both groups had a number of people in the Muslim League and their leaders had presided as Presidents of All India Muslim League.
Many of the Ulema’s were with the Congress while the Muslim League was a party of progressive Muslims and those who hailed from minority sects.
So Ulema’s role in creating Pakistan wasn’t huge, but it is sure is in destruction of it.
Recommend
Put ur house in order first
Recommend
@Mj:
How true you are!
Recommend
SS is distorting the history. Jamiat Ulama Hind voiceferously rejected and opposed the partition of India, Jamat-e-Islami and Mulana Moududi opposed Muslim League and Jinnal tooth and nail. Mr. Saleem is right Ulama suffered a lot at the hands of British because the Ulama were struggling for Indian independence. Apart from Qaid-I-Azam and British Govt, Communist Party and Anjuman Ahmadiyya supported the creation of Pakistan and partition of India. Please stop blaming Ulama.
Recommend
Its a fact that the biggest Ulema Party, Jamiat -e -Ulema Hind, opposed Pakistan but there were so many other religious leaders like Maulana Shabbir Ahmad Osmani and others who struggled shoulder to shulder with other Muslim League leaders.
Recommend
Maybe Shahbaz Sharif is referring to the religious leaders of the Ismailis and Ahmadis, they dont seem to get any recognition despite their role in making Pakistan a reality. The rest of the mullahs hated Pakistan, although they were pretty quick to hijack it when they saw it was working.
Recommend
The so-called Ulema never backed the demand for Pakistan.
Recommend
I can’t wait till the elections and the complete annihilation of the PML-N
Recommend
The ulemas’ majority supported the Indian Congress and were against the partition of India. After partition, the ulemas migrated to Pakistan and were out of the political mainstream. To get into the mainstream the ulemas started the anti-Ahmadiyya movement. Mr. Sharif please refrain from distorting history.
Recommend
Shahbaz Sharif needs to read history of Pakistan movement.The Ulemas were never for Pakistan.Most of the time SS does not know what he is talking about.When was the last time he read any book??
Recommend
Lets acknowledge the efforts of ‘Ulema’.. lets hand over the country to them (pun intended!). Sharifs had no role!
Recommend
That these enemies of humanity are projected as saviors of Islam by the corrupt billionaires in the context of the sunnah of Rahmetullillaleem is utter blasphemy !! This man, the Khadim-e-Alaa, is absolutely shameless to concoct lies in the context on seerat-un-Nabi, while he panders to the hypocrites. The so called ulema after failing to prevent the creation Pakistan turned it into a laboratory of practicing juhl by propagating the mindset of violence. They preach and incite to murder, burn, rape and forcibly convert people who subscribe to a different belief. The so-called ulema called Jinnah Kaffir-e-Azam. They shamelessly migrated to the land they called naPakistan and destroyed it from with. The proof is in the pudding.
Recommend
No they didn’t. Stop kissing up to these loons. Jamiat e Ulema e Hind was against creating Pakistan. PML N is a joke. Pakistan was actually created by secular main stream politicians. Maulvis were out of the picture until Bhutto started kissing up to Saudis which gave them a window of opportunity because Shia’s and Ahmadis won’t support the crazy’s in Ryadh.
Recommend
What??? is he in his mind… he has lost it. man ulemas were against the creation of pakistan and they had valid reasons for it which have been proven to be true over the years. So dont construct alternate histoty please Mr. CM
Recommend
@saleem: really?? Can you even name one of the so called ulema who made “sacrifices”?? Stop distorting history!!
Recommend
The ulema and punjab govt were responsible for the ethnic clensing and genocide of the hindus and sikhs in 1947, even according to muslim scholars.
http://www.apnaorg.com/columns/ahameed/column-27.html
http://www.sacw.net/partition/june2004IshtiaqAhmed.pdf
Recommend
The question being asked today by many is who is to be blamed for the partition that divided the Muslims of the subcontinent who represented a unique identity within the Muslim world and the world at large. Thus weakening the united voice into two (later three) irreconcilable communities. Look at India, the ‘minorities’ vote bank is such a substantial part of the dynamics which has given Muslims and other minorities significant leverage and a stake in the system. Now imagine this…undivided India would have had over 650 million muslims today which would make it approx 30% of the population (currently indian muslims make up 18% of the population). Imagine how much of leverage that would have given the Muslim community as a whole. It would have been a ideal stage to celebrate and build on the unique identity of a sub continent Muslim with its unique culture. Time to think for all of us….the best way to weaken a force is to split it (I am not talking about hindu India…but the subcontinent Muslims). Time to think….Recommend
CM of Punjab should think before he opens his mouth. All know that elections are forth coming so he wants to please these outfits who had no role in creating Pakistan but yes, now these same parties with multiple changed names are bent upon distortion the history. Our text books are already plagued with these distortions. Our country is already suffering from multiple illness due to these strategic assets which are backed by the mindsets of PML-N. Perhaps CM Punjab wants support of those banned parties which were seen recently advocating under the banner of “Difae e Pakistan”.
Recommend
Pfffft, What a joke ! Yeah that’s right, Maududi was our founding father and not Jinnah. Sure. Keep you’re fairy tales to yourself. Definitely not voting for PML-N in the future. Add this distortion of history to the fact that some pml-n leaders took part in a hate campaign against the ahmadi muslim community of Rawalpindi (which is still ongoing) !Recommend
Seriously this is your biggest problem. Keep the mullahs as far from politics and governing as you possibly can. Have you ever heard a western leader calling upon any religious leaders to provide a way forward? And please don’t tell me Pakistan is so much better as a society than the west. Your readers should know the truth of that.
Recommend
@Observer
Agreed. The biggest beneficiaries of partition are Indian Hindus. They got unified under one massive country which has given them a huge opportunity to get back their lost glory. I’m an Indian Muslim but I’m happy for my Hindu brethren.
Recommend
dear express tribune – why do you not post any of my comments – have i done something wrong?
Recommend
i am pakistani hindu and iam happy w/my muslim friends .so w/bigdeal about it?
Recommend
Religious leaders, regardless of the religion, are simply those who take advantage of people in the most impressionable area imaginable in regard to the human mind. People can never be confident that what they’re doing is right and they always want some form of reassurance that they are. The religious leader’s agenda is what will decide if they are or not. Not the God. It causes people to look in the wrong direction, though it’s made to look right. There should be nobody leading in a religious scenario. Just followers. None of them are born with any deeper understanding,of the text interpretations and as surprising as it may be, the beard doesn’t hold magical mind enhancing powers. One would be lead to believe a God wouldn’t make such a hierarchy when speaking to only the whole in the first place.
Recommend
Nonsense and lies, but then what does anyone expect from a Punjab Chief Minister who is going to go down in history as someone who allowed and did nothing to prevent the murder of Shias, Ahmadis and Christians during his misrule.
Recommend
Thank You Mr Jinnah, Ahmedis and Aga Khanis for supporting partition. Hope you are having a great time.
Recommend
He must be kidding, Jamaat Islami was against Pakistan
Recommend
Quaid-e-Azam Jinnah and ulema don’t mix. One created Pakistan and the other keeps destroying it. As rightly pointed out by commentators here, they were the ones who called him “Kafir-e-Azam.”
Recommend
Quaid-e-Azam Jinnah and ulema don’t mix. One created Pakistan and the other keeps destroying it. As rightly pointed out by commentators here, they were the ones who called him “Kafir-e-Azam.”Recommend
Yes Quaid did mention about some “useless coins” in his pocket!
Recommend
@Talha
“The Jamaat-e-Islami, Majlis-e-Ahrar (precursor to Khatme-Nabuwat) and the Deobandi Ulema in general opposed Pakistan. The only Deobandi to support Pakistan was Maulana Shabbir Ahmed Usmani who was a mid level figure in the Deobandi leadership circle. The only two religious groups to give their full support to Pakistan were Ahmadi’s and Aga Khani’s. Both groups had a number of people in the Muslim League and their leaders had presided as Presidents of All India Muslim League. Many of the Ulema’s were with the Congress while the Muslim League was a party of progressive Muslims and those who hailed from minority sects.
So Ulema’s role in creating Pakistan wasn’t huge, but it is sure is in destruction of it.
”Couldn’t be said better.
Recommend
@MarkH:
“Religious leaders, regardless of the religion, are simply those who take advantage of people in the most impressionable area imaginable in regard to the human mind. People can never be confident that what they’re doing is right and they always want some form of reassurance that they are. The religious leader’s agenda is what will decide if they are or not. Not the God. It causes people to look in the wrong direction, though it’s made to look right. There should be nobody leading in a religious scenario. Just followers. None of them are born with any deeper understanding,of the text interpretations and as surprising as it may be, the beard doesn’t hold magical mind enhancing powers. One would be lead to believe a God wouldn’t make such a hierarchy when speaking to only the whole in the first place.”
Beautifully said. This is perhaps the only time when I agree with you 200%
Recommend
Somebody please hand Shabaz Shareef a good history book.Recommend
@Mj:
Ulmas did it cuz they were not of the view of Quaid’s notions. Quaid always looked for a Separate nation.
Recommend
History of Pakistan-
Version 1.0- Released in 1947—Allama Iqbal,Qaed-e-Azam Jinnah, Huseyn Suhravardy, Zafarrullah Khan, Liaqat Ali, Bibi Fatima Jinnah and countless others together created Pakistan.
Version 2- Released in Zia Era- Bin Qasim and Mahmud Ghaznavi made Pakistan.
Version 3- Released 2012- Ullama-e-Ikram sired Pakistan.
Version 4- Likely dater of release 2013- The Khan and Taliban created Pakistan.
Its an evolving (hi) story.
Recommend
I can read between the lines….what he’s sayin all “that Pakistan came into being because of the opposition of the Ulama-e-soo”
Recommend