Sunny
High: 24°C
Low: 9°C
Alerts
 
< >

Too old to fly?

Published: July 30, 2010

The site of the Airblue plane crash on July 28, 2010. PHOTO: REUTERS

KARACHI: After the crash of Airbus A321, the debate on the retiring age and medical fitness of pilots has gained momentum.

The 62-year old pilot of the Air Blue flight, Pervaiz Iqbal Chaudhry, had three more years to reach the retirement age set by the Civil Aviation Authority (CAA).

CAA, as the prime regulator of airlines in the country, is responsible for the medical fitness of pilots, especially the senior ones. “CAA is ready to accept responsibility if anything in the investigations prove that it was the association’s fault ,” Deputy DG CAA Air Vice Marshal (r) Riaz ul Haq said when asked about the medical fitness of senior pilots. “CAA does strict medical scrutiny of pilots as they turn 60. Safety is our priority,” he said.

President of the Pakistan Air line Pilots’ Association (Palpa) Sohail Baluch said that the retirement age for pilots should be 60 years. “The reflex action of pilots deteriorates after 60 and considering the importance of safety, no pilot should be allowed to fly after the age of 60,” Baluch said.

Meanwhile, Palpa, which has been at loggerheads with the Pakistan International Airlines (PIA) over flying safety standard, said that PIA neglects international safety rules and force pilots to fly 17-hours, well over the 10-hour limit.  This is in violation of the agreement signed by both parties.

However, Deputy DG CAA said that it is unfair to say that pilots are being pressurised to fly continuously for 17 hours. He said that such situations occur rarely.

CAA needs to be more vigilant in scrutinising pilots, he said, adding that we need to induct new trained pilots instead of increasing the retirement age.

Published in The Express Tribune, July 30th, 2010.

Reader Comments (10)

  • Rafiq Ahmed
    Jul 30, 2010 - 12:53PM

    Why the Captain stayed awake all night to pray & next morning crashed the plane & killing 152 innocent people. He should have stayed home instead of destroying the lives & families of 152 victims. Sad & very pathetic! Rafiq AhmedRecommend

  • Jul 30, 2010 - 1:50PM

    See the results of violating the law…..so many lives gone,,,Recommend

  • Jul 30, 2010 - 2:44PM

    Let me remind Mr Farhan that the retirement age of pilots in PIA and CAA is still 60 years. This cannot change because it is our national retirement age. What has happened is that the age of utilization of pilots has been enhanced on the argument that there is a shortage of trained pilots. Unfortunately what has happened is that this has been assumed to be an open cheque by PIA, private airlines and the pilots and the waiver of extension in age of utilization has been abused for personal benefits. ICAO still does not allow pilots to fly commercial passenger flights beyond their national retirement age, or allow them to fly with medical disabilities. In some countries like UK, Singapore etc, the retirement age of pilots employed in BA or SIA is less than the national ages of retirement. Individual countries however can file differences based on the quality and availability of specialised medical facilties available and the research done based on local health conditions, hygene, availability of clean drinking water, etc. The spirit behind the ICAO permission for individual contries to file for waivers, stands defeated if this is abused. Medical waiver is an exemption of medical status and a disability for a pilot, which requires him not to fly with another pilot having any waiver. In this case what is happening is that overage pilots with medical conditions have been given another exemption, which is to fly beyond the age of superannuation. The contradiction becomes more evident when in actual fact there is no shortage of pilots in PIA. Total number of pilots in PIA are more than required for its airworthy fleet and utilization per aircraft. Yes there is a deliberate shortage being maintained on aircrafts like B777, A310 etc, by none other than the powerful pilot lobby that dictates its term. The present MD of PIA is part of this viscuous circle. It takes less than 3 to 4 months for a pilot already on PIA payrolls to be trained for conversion to these equipments and fill the shortage, provided there is a will. It is this dishonesty which leads to compromises on flight safety and I am afraid CAA is responsible for failing to put a stop to this abuse. Air Blue should have no reason not to recruit pilots below 60 years, to fly their aircrafts.Recommend

  • Meekal Ahmed
    Jul 30, 2010 - 2:46PM

    The age limit in the US which has the best safety record has been recently pushed up to 65.

    Age per se is not important as long as you pass your medical exam (every six months) and your simulator check ride (I think every six months too).Recommend

  • Saeed
    Jul 30, 2010 - 2:48PM

    How can u be so sure that the pilot stayed up and worshiped all night??Recommend

  • fiza
    Jul 30, 2010 - 4:28PM

    u cant blame the pilot it was just an accident who hve to occure and its ALLAH’S will as well all of us hve to pray for their forgivenessRecommend

  • Rashid Hussain Nizamani
    Jul 30, 2010 - 9:04PM

    I would like to inform Mr. Shahzad that the retirement age of PIA is no doubt 60 years, but CAA allows pilots to hold license till the age of 65, provided the pilot is physically and medically fit to fly and fulfills whatever requirements required by CAA. Captain Pervaiz was allowed by the CAA to fly (otherwise, he wouldn’t have been flying, would he?), which shows that he was physically and medically fit to fly.

    In reply to Mr. Rafiq Ahmed, with all due respect sir, can you please show us the proof that he stayed up all night to pray? A pilot with his experience would never take undue risk like that! PLEASE stop blaming the captain, he lost his life as well! I’m not saying that it might not be his mistake, it’s possible, but it’s the job of the investigation team to determine the reason of the crash, not us!! PLEASE DO NOT jump to conclusions!

    Thanks.Recommend

  • Meekal Ahmed
    Jul 31, 2010 - 1:14AM

    Let me repeat again. Age in US raised to 65. Maybe the US authorities know something we don’t. There has to be careful pairing with the co-pilot (can’t have two old folks in the cockpit at the same time) and I am sure there are pairing rules in Pakistan too. The co-pilot in this case was only 35. A very young man.

    Of course passing your medical and simulator checks is mandatory.

    The down-side to a big age-gap between the two is that the co-pilot will probably keep quiet even if he knows the very senior 25,000 hour captain to his left is doing something foolish or reckless. This is a culture thing common to our part of the world. We don’t want to — or are reluctant to — challenge authority because it is disrespectful. Yet, it is a fact that this culture thing has resulted in several accidents as revealed by the CVR — a famous one being a Korean Airlines Jumbo landing at Guam. Rather than call for a go-around in a clear authoritative voice, the co-pilot who realized that they were about to hit a hill just short of the runway made a very deferential and low-key suggestion that they should. It was more like a request rather than an urgent command.

    Who knows what this half-the-captains-age co-pilot did. They should have both attended CRM training (Cockpit Resource Management) which emphasizes the need to operate as a team and use all the resources in the cockpit.Recommend

  • QASIM
    Aug 1, 2010 - 11:33AM

    i would second Mr Rashid Hussain’s comment without any doubt!Recommend

  • ali ameen
    Aug 2, 2010 - 3:19AM

    The question is, are we going to learn anything from this incident?Recommend

More in Pakistan

X