Share this article
Print this page
ISLAMABAD: Since, currently, we do not have good relations with the US, it would only make sense that we try and have good relations with other countries. Foremost among these would be our immediate neighbours. That is just plain common sense, but clearly, as the saying goes; common sense is usually not that common.
In the interim period, every other day or so, we are being told that the government is reviewing the entire gamut of its relations with America. I would go one step ahead and say that we need to review our relations with all countries.
The world has changed and our foreign policy needs to recognise that change by adapting its worldview accordingly and the way our country interacts with the outside world.
Take, for example, the very important policy aspect relating to ties with India. Here, we need to recognise that there is no alternative to living in lasting peace with our eastern neighbour. This would be mutually beneficial for the people of both countries and in fact, the people of Pakistan could extract great economic benefit from it.
If Pakistan and India have normalised ties, there would be little need for either country to cling to an outside power, such as America, for security. Of course, this is not to say that Pakistan shouldn’t have good ties with developed countries but rather that priority should be given to establishing a permanent peace with India.
Furthermore, as has been already pointed out by experts, Pakistan cannot democratise without transforming itself from a national security state to one driven by national welfare. Anybody who is keen to redefine new terms of engagement with the US without at the same time advocating a lasting peace within South Asia, is living in a fool’s paradise.
Perhaps a serious look at the PPP Manifesto of 2008 may be a good starting point to clear the clouds of war in a nuclear-armed South Asia.
BA Malik
Published in The Express Tribune, January 24th, 2012.
More in Letters
Respecting the SC’s sanctity
India is Pakistan’s eternal enemy.
It stole Kashmir.
It stole the rivers.
It stole Jinnah’s house.
It stole Veena Malik.
It stole electricity from the water flowing into Pakistan.
It stole everything and made Pakistan a army ruled, theocratic state.
Recommend
It is heartening to see that more and more people are recognising the fact that 1947 partition was a historical blunder. If you cannot undo the same, then it is always better to accept it gracefully and live on peacefully with it rather than wasting your energy trying to defend the indefensible.
Recommend
India phobia has been cultivated over 6 decades and if policies are rolled back the entire edifice of the Jihadi industry will collapse. There are many whose life and bread and butter is provided by building paranoia and fueling hate. Economics is the last item on the plate of the Power Brokers. When Blackmail can yield superlative monetary benefits why entertain tougher options.
Recommend
@Indian friend of Pak: I am all for friendship and good relations with India but such things are actually made more difficult when you call the 1947 partition of the Raj a “blunder”. Pakistanis do not consider our independence from Britain and the formation of our nation a blunder. We are pleased to have rid ourselves of British colonial rule. We don’t subscribe to the notion that all South Asia is one country like the British and Indians.Your thinking is as much a problem to good neighbourly relations as is Indian intransigence on allowing occupied Kashmir its United Nations mandated right to decide its own future as part of India or Pakistan.
Recommend
@Amjad,
Nit-picking each others’ shortcomings is not going to help. People of both countries want to live in peace with each other. This aim is torpedoed by arms manufacturers offering bribes to powers that be. Arms are needed if we want to continue living at war with each other BUT NOT IF WE DO NOT! It is up to the PEOPLE to join hands against these greedy rulers in both countries.
Recommend
In my opinion yes the partition did not do good for both the countries, but Amjad feels different. I can also see his point. So instead of talking about the past we should think about the future of both the countries. We need friendship, brotherhood to straighten the history for our future generation.
Recommend
And who in PAK is going to sign the peace accord with India? if i remember correctly, there was one last accord signed in Simla. If one believes the one sided view of the wiki leaks, Musharraf came very close to resolving the issue and he also said so in an interview.
Popularly elected political parties are very vulnerable for such a drastic and bold initiatives, as can be seen in the simple issue of MFN status to India. Hence, at the present climate no political party has the guts and will to undo the damages of the past, except an authoritarian rule that can quell the domestic dissidence over its foreign policy, as it had been with war on terror during Musharraf.
Now who in PAK is ready to tie the bell to the cat?
Recommend