Sunny
High: 34°C
Low: 27°C
Alerts
 
< >

Living the hard life

Published: January 23, 2012

The writer is author of The Gun Tree: One Woman’s War (Oxford University Press, 2001) and lives in Bhurban

As the overly ambitious American war machine revs up for yet more action, this time against Iran, and the UN considers sticking its messy fingers in to Syrian internal affairs, it is pertinent to wonder where the voice of sanity has gone.

Wars, too many to list and the majority — either instigated by or joined in by gung-ho American troops — are actively being fought, but not necessarily won, with Afghanistan being a prime example. Most of these wars are based on nothing but greed with the ‘controlling’ one per cent of the global population, who rake in astronomical profits from the unbearable misery and needless deaths of the innocents trapped in the hells imposed on them.

It is absolutely chilling to comprehend that the deaths of others, whether men, women or children, means nothing at all to the one per cent, irrespective of nationality, who are sick — no make that insane — enough to place monetary gain above the value of human life. And, let’s face it, the long-term sustainability of the world as the inestimable destruction brought about by the vicious ravages of modern warfare does not simply fade away once the last bullet has been fired or the last nuclear warhead launched. The fallout of warfare now takes hundreds, possibly thousands and potentially millions of years to dissipate, if the environment and all existing therein manages to recover at all. But such truisms are not given consideration: money is all that counts.

Wars are rarely about artificial man-made borders these days and nor are they, if the facts were to be clearly spelled out, about cast, race or creed despite intense efforts to disguise them as such: The wars of today are all based on acquiring or holding on to natural resources such as oil, uranium and anything else considered mandatory to fuel the rampant consumerism on which ‘modern’ life depends and from which governments, corporations and private investors benefit financially. Human life is viewed as nothing more than a disposable commodity — much like the plastic bags that go hand-in-hand with the thoughtless acquisition of unnecessary goods. Although, unlike the birth of a human, a plastic bag is derived from the oil resources on which so many ongoing wars are based. Ludicrous when viewed in the latter context!

While the monstrous one per cent manipulate facts, figures, armies et al, most of the other 99 per cent heedlessly continue living as they always have done. The are expected to close their eyes and ears to the chaos rampaging through the global village that the world has become — of course, to be honest, some of these people have demonstrated the guts and the courage to stand up and be counted, but they have done that within their immediate environs. If one evokes the very word ‘peace’ in public then it is automatically, and wrongly, presumed that ‘peace’ was nothing more than a hippie catchphrase of the 1960s. And, like peace-loving hippies, the word is no longer in fashion and, therefore, no longer applicable, which demonstrates just how self-centred and self-destructive the human race has become.

Published in The Express Tribune, January 24th, 2012.

 

Reader Comments (6)

  • John B
    Jan 24, 2012 - 12:25AM

    For profit and control one day Americans suddenly woke up from the bed and sent their sons and daugters to Afghansitan to be killed and maimed.

    The author is living in an eutopian dream and time to wakeup. This is not 19th century colonialism where by the occupier ships of the wealth of the occupied country to build magnificent palaces and streets back home.

    The war in Afghanistan is not about natural resources as much as one would like to claim and afghanistan has no special resources that one cannot find elsewhere by purchasing it in open market, as all nations do including America.

    The global commerce has positive impact on everyones life, and no waring nation can claim the resources of the nation where they are fighting, even if the purported occupier is a victor. Eg: Germany and Japan post WWII, Iraq in modern context. So is Afghanistan.

    War is a messy business and as always the people on the ground suffer, from the victor to the victims.

    Global commerce cannot come through cannon in the modern world and it comes from stability and peace. Ironically, people for centuries went to war to obtain and maintain peace.

    Recommend

  • thinktank
    Jan 24, 2012 - 12:52AM

    Yep… wars are fought for sake of ‘peace’. That ‘peace’ can be real peace or it can piece of land… but all wars are fought for sake of ‘peace’ .

    Recommend

  • vasan
    Jan 24, 2012 - 6:52AM

    These days wars are fought on wrong idealogies based on religion. There are ways to control natural resources other than war, by participation of mining, technology transfer etc. China and India have not gone on to wars to acquire natural resources based assets in the world.

    Recommend

  • Arshid kamal
    Jan 24, 2012 - 12:35PM

    Today it is economic war, in which every one have keen interest in resources of others. America have no interest in Afghanistan CZ they cant get as much as they spent there but they planned to control over the Asia and especially on those countries which is now a day Boosting their economy and capturing the international market from west e,g china. But now the scene of Vietnam is repeating again with America therefore, they are trying to hit and target their allies partners in war of terror like Pakistan.

    Recommend

  • x
    Jan 24, 2012 - 11:53PM

    excellent zahra!

    Recommend

  • antanu g
    Jan 25, 2012 - 12:28AM

    @John B:
    obviously you and US war machine are on the same page….having no remorse for the loss of millions lives including those of american soldiers. Saner thing would be to stand up and say NO MORE WARS…but you woud not..it will hurt your inflated ego. Shame that people like you call yourselves as civilized. Even talebans are better at least the are killing for a couse which though is perverted. But so called civilized is killing just for the killing.

    Recommend

More in Opinion

X