Sunny Intervals
High: 32°C
Low: 27°C
Alerts
 
< >

Behind bars

Published: July 28, 2010

The writer is a freelance journalist

Isolating oneself in the branded ‘luxury’ of a gated compound is the ‘recommended’ lifestyle for those who want to enjoy a modicum of security in the Pakistan of today. With everything under one roof, including a gaggle of like-minded morons who have failed to comprehend the fallacy behind ‘developers’ lies, prison-style ghettos of hastily-constructed apartment blocks, complacently basking behind razor wire-topped walls, offer an ‘incomparable’ standard of life if existence in cloud cuckoo land is what turns you on.

Such integrated community housing projects, aimed at specific income brackets are, however, dangerous to the nth degree as they promote the creation of ‘islands of prosperity’, each island, over time, being inhabited by people with the same cultural roots. Ethnic-based communities, inevitably going for each other’s throats at the drop of a hat are already widespread throughout the country, being particularly noticeable in city suburbs and are most certainly not noted for their peaceful coexistence with other sections of society (as Karachi-ites in-particular know).

Furthermore, while it may sound like heaven to allow children to play, unattended, in the park which is offered as part of the deal, this too is obviously open to question as security is never all it is purported to be: Kidnappers and paedophiles do buy apartments too!

Such gated communities are not, as is often suggested, an American concept of modernity but are instead, a retrograde step in to the annals of history when times were just as fragile, albeit in slightly different ways, than they are now. ‘Then’ it was quite often the danger ‘without’, now it is the dangers both ‘without’ and ‘within’ and from any other conceivable angle.

Cities, towns, villages, farms were all, at some point, protected and gated largely self-sufficient entities in which their inhabitants felt safe from the marauders outside. These strongholds, subject as they were to attack and siege, evolved to safeguard the interest of the ‘haves’ from the avariciousness of the ‘have-nots’ and their slow disintegration, over hundreds of years actually, marked a progressive move towards a more open, balanced, even ‘democratic’ society based on commerce, free trade, respect and equality although, as always, some were more equal than others.

The current trend of returning to existence in a controlled environment — and do remember, that someone has to do the controlling — is a clear indication of a deep rooted fear: fear of strangers, of predators, of interacting with those perceived to pose any real or imagined threat and, above all, a strange fear of having to rely, solely, on oneself for survival. Huddling in hives, however, is as much the answer to visible societal breakdown as any other form of make-believe and only serves to contribute to increased instability. Those electing to remain outside the protective walls, either through choice or due to lack of finance, will, inevitably, be far more in touch with reality than those living under lock and key in their luxury prison cells and, when push comes to shove, as may very well happen, then it is those on the outside who will have easier access to the necessary tools of survival such as water and food.

It is, admittedly, natural for humankind to seek company but taking up residence in a supposedly like-minded community of strangers where, undoubtedly, a committee rules the roost, is far from being a move towards salvation.

Published in The Express Tribune, July 29th, 2010.

Reader Comments (4)

  • iffe
    Jul 28, 2010 - 11:49PM

    veryyyyy NICE~Recommend

  • Shahid
    Jul 29, 2010 - 1:38AM

    Arif Hasan and Akhtar Hameed Sb pointed towards this more than once. But since the readers of this post will most obviously be the Peruvian coffee sipping angrezi babu belonging to the urban upper middle class, the message will be left uncomprehnded.

    In Pakistan, this isn’t a new concept. Look at Islamabad. Yes, over time burroughs and scoio-economic zones emerge, but it was designed with socio-economic zones in mind but specific areas of housing set apart and distant from the hub of commercial and governmental offices. The development of Islamabad too has been at the cost of it’s neighbouring city which has had to bear the brunt of the lower middle class settlers.

    Pakistan is in the end, a country for the elites and by the elites. Through linkages with the state apparatus (both military and civil), our urban upper middle class is part of the state apparatus, yet it is vocal in denouncing the state structure while infact they are complacent of the social exploitation.

    Lahore is the worst picture of all where prime agricultural land is being obtained by the state under eminent domain or by private developers using thugs for high end housing schemes, the DHA being a case in point. The village of charrarpind, the perfect example of this unfettered expansion of upper middle class housing that his sickened our urban areas.Recommend

  • shy
    Jul 29, 2010 - 7:33AM

    Housing projects are decreasing our urban and agriculture areas.Recommend

  • Angleos
    Jul 29, 2010 - 10:30AM

    excellent article……..a point to ponder for all the new and existing housing schemes and their residents in Pakistan.Recommend

More in Opinion

X