Game-changer?: Man who delivered memo casts doubts

James Jones says Ijaz never mentioned Haqqani, nor does he think the former ambassador wrote the memo.


Rana Tanveer December 17, 2011

LAHORE:


In a key development in the Memogate scandal, a principal player has jumped into the fray – potentially turning the case on the matter, currently under scrutiny in the Supreme Court, on its head.


Gen (retd) James Logan Jones, former US national security adviser, and the man that handed the memo to the then-chief of US military, has said, in an affidavit to be filed in the court, that Mansoor Ijaz not once mentioned the name of principal accused Husain Haqqani in their conversations leading up to the sending of the unofficial communiqué.

He also cast serious doubts on the veracity of Ijaz’s claims that the memo had the backing of the “highest authorities” in Pakistan. In fact, he has stressed that he had no reason to believe that Haqqani had anything to do with it, and that the document was probably not “credible”.

Jones’ three-page statement has been given to Asma Jahangir for filing in the Supreme Court. Talking to The Express Tribune, Jahangir, who is representing former ambassador to the US Husain Haqqani, said she would be filing the document in the court registrar’s office on Monday.

The affidavit, which was drafted and attested by notary public on December 12, reads:

“I was in private life at all times relevant to the matters (memogate). I make this affidavit in response to a request from Pakistani counsel for former Pakistan Ambassador to the United States Husain Haqqani. It is my understanding that the affidavit may be used on his behalf with respect to an investigation currently under way in Pakistan”.

Citing details of the contact by Mansoor Ijaz, Jones said in the affidavit, “A few days before May 9, 2011 I received a phone call from Mr Mansoor Ijaz. I have known Mr Ijaz in a personal capacity since 2006. During the call Mr Ijaz mentioned that he had a message from the “highest authority” in the Pakistan government which he asked me to relay to then chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Admiral Michael Mullen. At no time during the call do I remember Mr Ijaz mentioning Ambassador Haqqani, and he gave me no reason to believe that he was acting at the direction of Ambassador Haqqani, with his participation, or that Ambassador Haqqani had knowledge of the call or contents of the message.

“On May 9th I received an email from Mr Ijaz attaching an unsigned memo. The e-mail was sent to my personal e-mail address by Mr Ijaz. The memo was not marked classified or restricted ... Mr Ijaz again stated that the memo was authorised by the ‘highest authority’ within the Pakistan government. Mr Ijaz asked that I deliver the memo to Admiral Mullen. It was my assumption that the memo was written by Mr Ijaz, since the memo essentially put into writing the language he had used in our telephone conversation earlier,” Jones said.

He added: “I do not recall whether Mr Ijaz claimed that Ambassador Haqqani had any role in the creation of the memo. I have no reason to believe that Ambassador Haqqani had any role in the creation of the memo, nor that he had any prior knowledge of the memo. Upon my reading of the memo that I was asked to forward Admiral Mullen, it struck me as highly unusual that the ‘highest authority’ in the Pakistan government would use Mr Ijaz, a private citizen and part-time journalist living in Europe, as a conduit for this communication. My personal opinion was that the memo was probably not credible.”

Jones went on to say, “... I felt obligated to forward it, as requested, to Admiral Mullen. Admiral Mullen, in his official capacity was better able to make a judgment as to the memo’s credibility ... Accordingly on May 10th, I emailed the memo to Admiral Mullen. It is my understanding from Admiral Mullen’s public statement on the matter that he reviewed the memo, did not find it credible, and did not take any action.”

(Read: Memogate unfolding)

Published in The Express Tribune, December 17th, 2011.

COMMENTS (31)

Hasan Mehmood | 12 years ago | Reply As I said earlier its a sting operation whose spectacular success / plausible credibility is based on the known mindset of Haqqani and Zardari. They may have harboured such thoughts but are not so stupid to practically initiate such ideas unless goaded / coaxed and encouraged from a third party. The reasons of such a sting operation and the masterminds behind it can be better elaborated upon by more knowledgeable readers. Please note I am anti Haqqani / Zardari even if I dont believe they are the primary movers of this memo. WE SHOULD STRIVE TO BE FAIR INSPITE OF OUR POLITICAL INCLINATIONS. Note to Editor: Its my third attempt. Why are you reluctant to post it. Is it because you only publish "for or against" one sided opinions?
adnan Khan | 12 years ago | Reply

@S!D: James is saying that Mansoor iJaz didn,t mentioned HH name on any occasion and mansor Ijaz requested him to forward it as it is from the ‘highest authority’ in the Pakistan government. No name, no sign, no address nothing how he could believe it credible. and suppose if it was real and it would hv gone to Mike Mullen, how he would know that it has come from the ‘highest authority’ in the Pakistan government. this is a well drafted game against Haqani and they preparator are succesful so far by ousting haqani from his office.

VIEW MORE COMMENTS
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ