Comments
Share this article
Print this page
SC tells AGP to file application before 17-member bench
ISLAMABAD: The Supreme Court of Pakistan has turned down the federation’s request to defer proceedings in the case regarding the non-implementation of the National Reconciliation Ordinance verdict. In an application filed on Saturday, the government had asked for the proceedings to be delayed till the 17-member SC bench hearing the government’s review petition regarding the NRO judgment arrived at a decision.
On Monday, Attorney General of Pakistan Maulvi Anwarul Haq appeared before the five-member SC bench headed by Justice Nasirul Mulk seized of the NRO non-implementation case. He told the court that the federation is optimistic that its review petition will be successful and so sought deferral of the implementation of the NRO judgement case.
However, Mulk told Haq that the forum competent to entertain the application would be the 17-member bench. “This five-member bench does not have jurisdiction to suspend hearing of this case,” said Mulk.
Giving the AGP two weeks to resubmit the application before the 17-member bench, Mulk adjourned the hearing till July 26.
Mulk also directed the interior ministry to submit its investigation report regarding the reappointment and promotion of Ahmad Riaz Sheikh on the next date of hearing.
Significantly, Mulk also announced that the court will now appoint court assistants to help with the implementation of the NRO verdict. However, he did not elaborate on what exactly will be the function of these assistants.
Talking to The Express Tribune, senior advocate Hamid Khan said the court has the authority under article 190 of the constitution to appoint such assistants for the implementation of its decisions. However, Khan and others agree that it’s too early to say who these will be and what functions and authority they’ll have. “The court has the power to appoint officers for the implementation of its verdict if the executive is not implementing it but the functions of these assistants will be determined by the court in its detailed judgement,” said senior lawyer Akram Sheikh.
Published in The Express Tribune, July 13th, 2010.
More in Pakistan
AJK premier urges ‘proactive policy’
Comment & Debate
US congressional hearing on Balochistan ‘ill-advised’ move: Sherry Rehman
Proud_BalochAmazed to see so many Indians shedding the crocodile tears tears for Baluchistan..dont worry friends your ill thoughts against pakistan ...
Why speak for the Ahmadis?
Osama SiddiqueExcellent Saroop. You speak eloquently of the civility, humanity and tolerance that our nation is fast losing. Kudos for an ...
Pakistan, Sri Lanka agree to enhance cooperation
khanshame that we need to beg for line of credit dollars from a small country like Sri Lanka while we ...
Inequality and human potential
meekal ahmedDr Sahib, I hope our dear Deputy Chairman of the Planning Commission reads this. When asked why his "new" growth strategy ...
Meera: ‘I am leaving Lollywood’
hinameera will always be meera!
Anonymous hack CIA, shut down website
Sobriquet@Colonel: The security of the CIA's actual computer systems has not been hacked. This is only a denial-of-service attack which ...
22 years after giving SA a new face, Mandela to feature on currency
RobinANP is changing the name of Kohat Tunnel
Thar coal: Despite PM’s orders ministry fails to allocate funds
Harry Stone@Amjad: Quite typical reasoning by PAK
Barred: Lawyers ban drink on court complex
kalimullah khanThis kind of step taken by some of the learned lawyers is out of place and discriminatory. Commonsense and logic rejects ...
Meera: ‘I am leaving Lollywood’
WaleedWait, what fans? I want to know who these people are. Please, contact me.