Disastrous disaster management

High time that our policy makers transcend their conventional fire-fighting and reactive mode of disaster management.


Syed Mohammad Ali October 06, 2011

Although natural disasters are nothing new, the ability of states to manage them has been receiving increased international attention over the past few years. To contend with the potential devastation, caused in large part by natural disasters brought on by climate change, the United Nations has set up a new entity called the United Nation’s International Strategy for Disaster Reduction (UNISDR).

This new body has expressed its concern about the severe floods currently ravaging many countries across Asia. This latest wave of flooding has claimed hundreds of lives and adversely affected millions of people in Thailand, Cambodia, Bangladesh, the Philippines, India and Pakistan.

The governments of developing countries are, therefore, being urged to increase their investments in disaster risk reduction. The UNISDR rightly points out that a range of technologies do exist to alert communities before floods arrive, so that they can be evacuated in time. It is, however, equally important to realise that natural catastrophes, such as floods, cause much less death than damages to public assets, as well as to the livelihoods and homes of poor people. It is this latter damage that causes long-term, adverse effects on people and their well-being, long after the actual flood waters recede.

Pakistan has witnessed major impacts of climate change consecutively during these last two years. Climate experts consider this unexpected change, a part of broader regional climate changes which will increase the frequency of major floods and droughts.

Although Pakistan has formulated a national climate change policy, there are many obstacles to implementing any such policy. Besides economic constraints, ineffective governance is also responsible for the resulting lack of public awareness of the climate crisis. Pakistan should pay closer attention to policy making efforts in neighbouring countries like Bangladesh, India and Nepal, which have all come up with climate change action plans which are actually being implemented.

There is also urgent need to review why existing disaster management entities in the country have not been able to achieve their mandated goals. Several experts have pointed out that the effects of the latest floods in Sindh, could have been prevented if efficient disaster risk reduction mechanisms had been installed in flood-prone areas after last year’s disastrous floods. Why this did not happen merits serious attention.

It is high time that our policy makers transcend their conventional fire-fighting and reactive mode of disaster management, to respond to climate change through tangible disaster prevention and mitigation measures. For instance, evident steps must be initiated to prevent illegal canal breaches by landlords to divert water away from their lands and residential encroachments along canal banks to minimise future flood damages. Constructing check-dams and other barriers to harness the floodwaters, could in turn, help contend with impending droughts.

The cost of not seriously taking these needed steps is plain to see. The floods of last year and of this year have cost Pakistan billions of dollars in terms of crop, livestock and infrastructure damage. Given the increasing international mistrust of our country, as well as the growing sense of disaster-fatigue, even international aid agencies are finding it very difficult to raise sufficient funds to meet the immediate needs of those affected by the floods. The resulting insufficient mobilisation of resources, coupled with the lack of capacity of our own cash-strapped government, has led a thoroughly inadequate emergency relief and recovery response in the flood-affected areas.

Such a dismal state of affairs translates into untold suffering for the disaster victims, many of whom were already leading lives of extreme deprivation. We simply cannot afford such a lackluster attitude towards disaster management and must be better prepared before the next monsoon season, or when another form of natural disaster strikes.

Published in The Express Tribune, October 7th, 2011.

COMMENTS (2)

yousaf | 12 years ago | Reply

floods of the last and this year and many more floods yet to come have not been visualised by the authorities to be.All sorts of warnings,forecasts,changes in globel climate,recent unusual and severely unprecedented solar activity after a long known time and the historic ruins as a living proof of destruction by floods many times over as shown during the excavations of places like moin-jo-daro, harappa,pushklawati near Charsada(kpk) and several other known and unknown flood devastated places of the past requires us to wake up to the situation.I said -many times-because while excavating various sites,layer upon layer was found to show that a certain city was destroyed many times over.Now here,imagin the volume of destruction we would have faced if almost on all rivers of Pakistan,India had not constructed dams and diverted water.Not that I am in favour of the fact that our water has been usurped by India but just for the sake of general knowledge visualise what would have happened to the land of the pure.So even now is time for the "pures" to take the map of Pakistan,put it before them,and see how can water be channelised in future so that it causes minimum damage

meekal ahmed | 12 years ago | Reply

It is not only the international aid agencies that are mistrustful of government but also the Pakistani diaspora. In response to a request for donations, there was a blunt reply saying that we will contribute provided it starts from the top -- from the President down to all the parasites and fat-cats in our land who don't pay their taxes and have all their assets in foreign exchange and their liabilities (un-paid loans) in rupees.

In the meantime, the letter concluded, we will hold on to our purses.

Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ