Sunny
High: 34°C
Low: 28°C
Alerts
 
< >

Ganders and geese

Published: July 9, 2010

The writer is a freelance columnist (amina.jilani@tribune.com.pk)

As the international press put it, in a rare show of unity this week amidst the republic’s fractious politicians agreed to convene a national conference to try to sort out the terrorism factor. The last time the national lot got together on the same topic was two years ago and the grand meeting fizzled out into nothing.

This love-fest was prompted by the suicide bomb attack of July 1 on Lahore’s Data Darbar shrine that killed 42 worshippers (majority members and all of the deprived variety) and injured some 200. What is known as the Punjab Taliban is the main suspect. This act of violence was unanimously – politicos, religiosos and all – vociferously ‘condemned’ and the country saw many protests, demos and city shut-downs. A somewhat different reaction to the event of May 28 when in two ‘places of worship’ of a minority community just under 100 people were slain as they prayed and a larger number were injured. The reaction of the majority – politicos, religiosos and all – was comparatively rather muted. It raised no suggestions for a national get-together.

So, majority is majority and minority remains minority — and never the twain shall meet. The constitution, the laws, and the national mindset dictate that what is sauce for the gander is not sauce for the goose.

The 2010 report of the US commission on International Religious Freedom has put Pakistan on the list of 13 countries “of particular concern” that are serious violators of religious freedom. It tells the world that the abuse of the right to religious freedom is rampant as evidenced by the rise in religiously motivated crimes against minorities. Not only is there growing intolerance fuelled by the numerous religious militant and terrorist organisations but there is a growing societal mindset shift to the right and a pathetic understanding of the rights of the minorities. And most tellingly, “religiously discriminatory legislation has fostered an atmosphere of intolerance.”

The government and its supporters wax lyrical about the marvels of the 18th amendment, but in actual fact it is an eye-wash. The constitution remains marred, dangerously, by Ziaul Haq’s eighth amendment which has nothing to do with tolerance and live and let live, but all to do with keeping minorities in their rightful place, which is practically nowhere in the national scheme of things. As long as the eighth amendment is allowed, with impunity, to exist and dictate, no number of national gatherings will be able to make a whit of difference to the sweeping terrorism with which we are beset. Hand in hand with the ‘Islamic provisions’ of the eighth amendment are Ziaul Haq’s gift to the nation of his disgusting laws that blot our statute books — the Hudood Ordinances and the blasphemy laws which remain in full force. The legislators in place are bereft of conscience, or shame, as they have made no move to do away with the glaring wrongs that are eating away happily at the roots of their country. And this despite the fact that they are reminded time and again by international forums that they should act if their country is to take a rightful place in the comity of nations of the 21st century. The Rabbani constitutional reforms committee threw away an opportunity to do right by the republic and its people— as did the mass of legislators.

The ruling party never ceases to bemoan the ills that it suffered under Ziaul Haq and his like, but it lacks the guts, and the humanity – or it is too busy keeping itself where it is – to tackle the forces of darkness, the enemies of tolerance.

Published in The Express Tribune, July 10th, 2010.

Reader Comments (7)

  • jehangir waqar
    Jul 10, 2010 - 12:44AM

    No one does an article detailing the specific discriminatory laws against women in our country as the majority of ppl have no idea that such misogynistic laws are in force against 51% of our population.
    If more ppl knew, maybe some difference might be made.Recommend

  • Fareed Ahmed
    Jul 10, 2010 - 1:31PM

    Religiously discriminatory legislation has not only fostered an atmosphere of extreme intolerance but has worked as a catalyst in transforming peaceful and tolerant citizens into wolves. The hate preached by the clerics is fueled by these laws and ordinary citizens are engulfed in the resulting fire, very few knowingly and most; victims of their ignorance.

    The rather muted response of ‘all’ to the 28th May mayhem can be understood in the light of the magnanimous show of tolerance of the majority of Pakistanis to the continuous extreme incitement to violence by the ignorant clerics calling Ahmadis Wajib-ul-Qatal.

    This invitation to violence has been sermonized regularly for over a century and has been ignored by the majority of citizens and overlooked by the state. The citizens ignored the call generally; just as they ignore Islamic injunctions on briberies, forgeries etc. Why did the state ignored this continuing call to violence is beyond the realm of logic and understanding? The state over the years not only ignored the extreme incitement to violence but adopted hate laws, which facilitated the incitement to violence.

    Majority of Pakistani are not in favor of these discriminatory laws adopted by military dictators to please fringe and militant clerics and to prolong their stay.Recommend

  • M Chaudhry
    Jul 11, 2010 - 12:29AM

    The Ahmadis have not protested the killing of their members by holding demonstrations, organizing sit-ins or speaking out loudly on the media. There has been no compensation demand from them. In a previous much smaller incident the compensation money offered by the government was donated by the victimized Ahmadi families to the earthquake victims.

    The only request from the Ahmadis was that they should be treated as equal citizens of Pakistan; regardless of their religious differences with the majority.

    Wasn’t this what Jinnah envisioned and promised in his speech of 11th August 1948?

    Jinnah spoke of an inclusive and impartial government, religious freedom, rule of law and equality for all and advocated the separation of religion (church) and the state.

    We have clearly failed Jinnah on all accounts.Recommend

  • Tony Khan
    Jul 11, 2010 - 3:25PM

    Its shocking, the Islamic Republic of Pakistan is a serious violators of religious freedom.

    The Objectives Resolution was adopted by the Constituent Assembly of Pakistan in 1949 and was called by Liaquat Ali Khan as “the most important occasion in the life of this country, next in importance only to the achievement of independence”. The Objectives Resolution was made a substantive part of the Pakistan Constitution in 1985. Three of its paragraphs are as follows:

    3 The principles of democracy, freedom, equality, tolerance and social justice, as enunciated by Islam, shall be fully observed.
    4 Muslims shall be enabled to order their lives in the individual and collective spheres in accordance with the teachings of Islam as set out in the Qur’an and Sunnah.
    5 Adequate provision shall be made for the minorities to freely profess and practice their religions and develop their cultures.

    In presence of such powerful legislation and the freedom of religion ingrained in Islamic scriptures and principles; how can Pakistan be a ‘serious violator of religious freedom’?

    Its is clear that we are nor following our religion or our constitution.Recommend

  • AMC
    Jul 11, 2010 - 9:40PM

    What does Pakistan’s foreign policy have in common with its domestic policy? Both seek to curb freedom of speech. Internationally, Pakistan introduced the defamation of Islam resolution in 1999 before the United Nations Commission on Human Rights. This resolution aimed to stop attacks against Islam by linking freedom to criticize Islam with incitement to violence. Domestically, the government of Pakistan adopted similar blasphemy provisions in 1984 with Ordinance XX, Section 298-B & 298-C, which established the insult of the Koran or the prophet Muhammad as a crime punishable with death. Extremists have used this “constitutional protection” to increasingly target minority groups they claim are “insulting” Islam.Recommend

  • KAT
    Jul 11, 2010 - 9:51PM

    Where are the moderate Muslims? Moderate Muslims are reluctant to comment due to fear of backlash. Police rounded up innocent Christians under the guise of the blasphemy laws, boulevards displayed banners declaring minority Ahmadi Muslims to be worthy of death, and school curricula were littered with hatred against the Jews. Moderate Muslims play it safe.

    These recent attacks are a direct consequence of Pakistan’s longstanding unwillingness to reform its legal and educational system and the reluctance of moderate Muslims to speak up. So where are the moderate Muslims now? They are getting killed.Recommend

  • Qirat
    Jul 11, 2010 - 9:57PM

    Is this Jinnah’s Pakistan? Jinnah envisioned a Pakistan where all minorities would have equal rights. He said in his 1948 radio address to the US: “Pakistan is not going to be a theocratic state, to be ruled by priests with a divine mission. We have many non-Muslims – Hindus, Christians, and Parsis – but they are all Pakistanis.” And he lived up to his promise by taking minority members in his first cabinet.

    The Pakistani government has not done enough to protect minorities from the Taliban who are driven by a divine mission to kill. Rather than inciting violence against helpless minorities through banners, posters, fatwas, and talk show hosts, the government should live up to Jinnah’s vision by removing laws from Pakistan’s constitution that limit freedom of religion.Recommend

More in Opinion

X