Comments (6)
Share this article
Print this page
No breakthrough on issue of smuggled goods
Pakistan on Tuesday once and for all rejected Afghanistan’s demand of opening up its eastern borders to allow the landlocked state to trade with India, dimming prospects of an early agreement on a new transit trade treaty.
Sources within the Finance Ministry said that visiting Afghan Finance Minister, Omar Zakhilwal, proposed the addition of a clause to the new Pak-Afghan transit trade agreement that could enable Kabul to renegotiate the possibility of trading with New Delhi after three to four years.
“The bone of contention is the language of the new draft agreement, as Afghanistan wants to insert a provision which would keep the door open for talks on the issue of trade with India,” explained an official of the ministry.
Furthermore, no mutually acceptable solution could be reached on the issue of curbing smuggling of Afghanistan-bound goods into Pakistan. Sources said that Afghanistan was not ready to cap its imports or levy duties on them.
Pakistan had proposed customs duties on Afghanistan-bound imports and also offered to collect them on behalf of Kabul.
It is claimed that Pakistan offered Afghanistan a relaxation on the import of some of the 30 items on the negative list in order to reach an agreement.
Pakistan’s official position on the matter was that the transit trade agreement is strictly between Islamabad and Kabul and that the issue of trade with India is a separate one.
Agreement on a new transit trade treaty is a key focus of the Afghan delegation’s two-day visit to Islamabad. Sources shared that both sides have set July 16 as the revised deadline to sign the treaty.
Both nations signed a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) to ink a new deal by the end of 2009 under an American initiative. However, Pakistan is not ready to give in on the issue of allowing Afghanistan to trade with India due to strategic interests.
Six rounds of talks have already been held between the Joint Working Group representing stakeholders from both countries.
In a statement, Finance Minister Dr Abdul Hafeez Shaikh said that Pakistan was aware of its international commitments under the UN Convention on Transit Trade of Landlocked States and Article 5 of General Agreement on Trade and Tariff.
He declared that Pakistan recognised the rights of Afghanistan as a landlocked country and that it was committed to assisting Afghanistan in regional and international trade.
An official of the Afghanistan Embassy told The Express Tribune that even though outstanding issues could not be resolved on Tuesday, it was expected that an agreement would be reached very soon.
Published in The Express Tribune, July 7th, 2010.
More in Business
Prices of automobiles surge as GST rises 1%
‘…….is not dependable friend,
can not be believed.
Time has compelled it extending hand of friendship
and providing economic assistance otherwise have seen in 1971 war.
should not provide the facility because it is not favorable to Pakistan.
It is new trick which is unacceptable at all.Recommend
Perhaps a broader view will shed some light on tariffs. For a bad example, we needn’t look farther than India itself.
India’s tariff stranglehold over Nepal saps that nation’s strength and creates destabilizing forces that are quickly spilling over into India itself. It is neo-colonialism at its worst.
Attempts by successive governments in Nepal to create a free-trade corridor from Bangladesh have been rebuffed by Delhi with a potent mixture of arrogance and punitive contempt.
In the interim, Nepal remains dependent on foreign aid that could better be used elsewhere, if tariffs could be replaced with trade.
India’s policies are inexcusable and totally indefensible by all parties—except for like-minded bureaucrats in Islamabad, gazing westward.
Tariffs are a colonial legacy that have been conveniently adopted by successive administrations that are too ‘not ready’ to bring the region into the global economic mainstream. Not ready for prosperity. Not ready to replace aid with trade.
We can do better. We have to do better.Recommend
Afghanistan and India are not reliable neighbors… We cant afford another “Afghan Transit Trade”.Recommend
I would say, that Afghanistan and Pakistan both have a majority Sunni Population, a big Pashtun Population, a huge legal and illegal trade, both are tied to eachother historically and pratically to each other, so they should just become ONE NATION. This just may well be the solution of most of the problems in the area. To make it even better the small minorities living in the North, West and Southern Afghanistan may be allowed / given to join the neighboring countries of their ethnic origin like Iran, Tajiskistan, Turkmenistan and what not.Recommend
Pointless talk, Pakistan would never allow Afghan transit trade for various reasons.
Njunaid:
If Punjabi, Baloch, Sindhi and Pashtuns can coexist why can’t Pashtun and Tajiks?Recommend
I wonder why Pakistan insists to be a part of SAARC while it disallows inter-regional trade.Recommend