Share this article
Print this page
Email a friend
- RSS
- Today's Paper
- Subscribe
- beta 2.0
High: 34°C
Low: 27°C
Alerts
Inching forward
Everyone knew going in that these talks were merely a precursor for further negotiation.
If Khar can similarly dazzle everyone with her diplomatic skills, she may not be the liability as foreign minister that some initially feared. PHOTO:AFP
The threshold for success at yesterday’s talks between the foreign ministers of India and Pakistan in New Delhi was set so low that it becomes impossible to describe them as a failure. Everyone knew going in that these talks were merely a precursor for further negotiation and would not produce any significant breakthroughs on their own. This is reflected in the joint statement issued after the talks between Hina Rabbani Khar and SM Krishna. Apart from a few specifics on trade and visa issues, the document shows that the talks merely aspired to success and did not actually manage to get there. Terrorism, the one issue that has stalled the peace process above all else, merited only a few words in the statement, as did the Kashmir dispute. This is a sign that India and Pakistan are no closer to an agreement on these matters than they were before Khar landed in New Delhi.
The talks themselves threatened to be derailed on the very first day of Khar’s visit, when she met with Kashmiri leaders. Her meetings annoyed the Indians, who have no desire to discuss the Kashmir issue and who see any Pakistan involvement in the disputed valley as a hindrance to the normalisation of relations. But Khar has a delicate balancing act to achieve. Given her gender, relative youth and inexperience, Pakistan’s notoriously male and aged establishment would be worried that she may give the house away. The talks with the Kashmiri leaders were meant as a sop to the anti-India brigade, a lobby that a new foreign miniser must appease, at least initially.
Just how little was achieved at the summit is demonstrated by the fact that the talks themselves were a sideshow obscured by Khar’s star power. In just one day, she has become a bona fide celebrity in India, not for her diplomatic skills but for her looks, sense of style and pricey handbags. If Khar can similarly dazzle everyone with her diplomatic skills, she may not be the liability as foreign minister that some initially feared. Right now, though, she has achieved a victory for style over substance. The same can be said for a summit that made world headlines without actually achieving much in the way of progress.
Published in The Express Tribune, July 28th, 2011.
Read more:
pakindiatalks
Reader Comments (5)
Latest News
Hamesh Khan’s bail: NAB asked to reply in a week
Former Bank of Punjab president claims his co-accused was granted bail, and he too must be afforded the same relief.
Kuwaiti pleads innocent in Twitter trial
Hamad alNaqi has been under arrest on charges of insulting Prophet Mohammad (PBUH), rulers of Saudi Arabia and Bahrain
Tunisia vows to punish attacks on alcohol vendors
The attack raised religious tensions in the home of the Arab Spring.
Yemen violence worsens as suicide bomber kills 90
At least 90 wounded, 200 wounded , says government.
US stocks rebound, Facebook shares dive
In the first 45 minutes of trade, the Dow Jones Industrial Average was up 48.78 points, or 0.39%, to 12,418.16.
Recent Slideshows
More in Editorial
Confrontation unending
This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, redistributed or derived from.
Unless otherwise stated, all content is copyrighted © 2012 The Express Tribune News Network.
Technical feedback? webmaster@tribune.com.pk
Rome was not built in a day. We must give Hina Rabbani Khar some more time to prove her effectiveness.
Although Khar’s pricey handbags and designer dark glasses were distasteful as she is representing a poor country that lives on alms, she did manage to create a thaw insofar as imagery is concerned. Her demeanour was soft and gentle – in contrast to the hollow huffing and puffing of Shah Mahmood Qureshi – and, one hopes, that her personality will continue to portray a soft image of Pakistan especially at the United Nations General Assembly session in September.
The joint statement, as is abundantly clear, outlined what had been agreed upon by both sides even before Ms. Khar landed in New Delhi. This approach is worthy of applause. Contentious issues need to be discussed and resolved through quiet diplomacy on the sidelines. In addition the joint statement appears to be a roadmap outlining other issues that need to be tackled. It should be taken seriously. And now that the Pakistani military establishment has to some extent been chastened by self-inflicted wounds, as well as by the changing global landscape, its narrow agenda driven by pure self-interest should become secondary to what is in the best interests of the 180 million people of Pakistan. The likes of the bearded Sardar Assef Ali and the fashionista from Saville Row, Khurshid Mahmood Kasuri, should be put out to pasture; they have only been mouthpieces of the military. Hina Khar represents the aspirations of the new generation of Pakistanis who do not want continued conflict with India.
Ms. Khar may please note that she has a pleasing personality as well as charisma and she does not need expensive handbags and designer dark glasses to reinforce this attributes. She may wish to pass them along to Salman Bashir who could use both.
Recommend
It is said that Pakistan is a major non-NATO ally. I disagree. Pakistan is a major NATO country—that is, No Action, Talk Only. As before, the Pakistan-India dialogue process would only produce a lengthy press release from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs replete with aspirational motherhood statements and highfalutin language. The new foreign minister is just a “soft front” and sounding board for the jurassic bureaucrats at the Foreign Office and tough-talking military. As one commentator had said, the foreign ministry portfolio will merely pad the new occupant’s résumé.
Recommend
The reason Ms. Khar has found a high appreciation in India is her easy elegance as opposed to the brash, arrogant and undiplomatic Mahmood Qureshi.
It is also because most of India is Young and feels suffocated by the geriatric ward that is called Indian Union cabinet. Average age > 70years!!!
But, her statement that India’s stand on Mumbai & Terrorism looks dated is as ridiculous as someone telling her Pakistan’s stand on Kashmir looks dated!!Recommend
True atleast hrk was decent, unlike qureshi, who while visiting taj mahal said it is part of pakistans heritage!Recommend
@noor nabi
please stop calling Pakistan a “poor country.” it is an incredibly rich land where masses are exploited by a few rich feudals. it is the poverty of the morals and not the materials. give Pakistan a chance out and the world would be stunned!Recommend