Share this article
Print this page
The writer is a former TV morning show host (naveen.naqvi@tribune.com.pk)
Parveen was the name of my neighbour’s domestic worker. I know this because from about eight in the morning to eleven at night, I heard her name shouted out every few minutes. Parveen, bring water. Parveen, open the gate. Parveen, get the newspaper. That last syllable of her name drawn out to a high-pitched end. When Parveen did poorly, I knew, for she would be subjected to verbal abuse that resounded through a portion of the street. Parveen could never do well, could she? Also, what we heard were the raised voices and foul language, who knew knows what else came her way? One afternoon, I stood at my window, peering into the adjoining house, determined to spot the enigmatic Parveen.
Parveen was a 10-year-old girl. She may have been older, as it is common for the growth of children from lower income groups to be stunted. Despite how troublesome she appeared to be to her employers, the girl’s tenure lasted the length of the two years that I lived in that house. How she managed to stay in their employment is beyond me, but then, the domestic ‘helpers’ of this country are not exactly flush with options.
A brief report in Tuesday’s papers made me hope otherwise. Yes, it is true. Sindh’s provincial minister for women development, Tauqeer Fatima Bhutto, has said that the government is framing a law to protect ‘the rights of home-based female workers like those working at different places in informal sector where hundreds of thousands of male and female workers were deprived of their rights.’
It is true that the possibility of this law could only arise after countless women were raped, tortured and abused. Not just women but young girls such as 12-year old Shazia Masih who recently got a great deal of attention in the press after being tortured and beaten to death by her employers. But what is important is that the agitation of human rights groups, the civil society and the media is about to bear fruit and bring change for the better. It is also occasion to say a word of praise for this government. A law that governed child domestic labour would have been a step in the right direction. A law that governs all domestic labour is an ideal situation.
Let me not get carried away by my enthusiasm though. The problem in Pakistan and other developing countries is not always in the law or the lack of it. The real issue is the implementation of the law. By now, we all know that Masih’s employer was a lawyer and an influential one at that. According to Bhutto, the new law would seek to register all domestic labourers. Is there any guarantee that when and if the law is passed it will be executed?
Published in the Express Tribune, June 17th, 2010.
More in Opinion
Paradise regained?
Protecting under age domestic workers is something that should be happening now, and should have been happening years ago. Though, even the framing of laws are not enough, the fact that a 10 year old girl has legal protection from physical abuse is one thing. However, his or her rights to education (as guaranteed in the 18th Amendment) are quite another.
Children working in homes on a full-time basis deserve more than just a “pleasant working environment”. While I realise that they are important sources of income for their families, policy must be framed to allow such children to have access to education. May it be via, afternoon or evening classes, classes on weekends, or requiring employers to offer enough time off for intensive lessons.
Proving for your family at a young age is a burden enough, to have your childhood robbed, deprived off education so that there is no way to escape domestic slavery (considering the hours worked, and the going wage its slavery) is inexcusable. A worthy first step but not enough.Recommend
I am not quite sure that the Sindh Minister for Women’s Development refers to “domestic labour” when she speaks about “home-based workers”. In most cases, home-based workers refers to the informal sector where labour, in many cases comprised of women, is engaged in production of goods such as match sticks, agar-bati, bangles, edibles within their “homes”. In most cases this does NOT refer to domestic labour. As for the requirement for a law which monitors and regulates domestic labour, particularly that of children, there would be serious issues in terms of the inherent contradiction with the constitution which forbids the employment of any child before he or she reaches the age of majority. I believe Ms. Naqvi has her heart in the right place, but there may be some confusion as to what the initiative of Ms. Tauqir Bhutto’s ministry actually refers to. Pakistan is a signatory to the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child, and putting into effect a law which legalizes child labour, domestic or otherwise, would be problematic and in contradiction with government’s international as well as consititutional committments.Recommend
Like you said, the real challenge lies in implementation, but atleast a step has been taken in the right direction. Here is to hoping the Parveens of this country will have some law for their rights and protection. Thank you for bringing this to our knowledge.Recommend
Naveen has rightly pointed out the domestic issues in our country; the implementation of law and order is necessary for the protection of rights of domestic workers and minorities.Recommend
Why these personal attacks against people? Stick to the subject. If you have nothing to say don’t say it and go away.
I think the Web Editor should delete comments that are hurtful and insulting.
When I wrote something recently I was accused of fabricating stories, distorting the facts and presenting a fairy-tale and therfore I should be immediately appointed Advisor to Mr. Zardari. Yet, no one was prepared to tell me, here or on my e-mail, which story I fabricated and which facts I distorted.
Be critical but be constructive and stop hiding behind assumed names (not necessarily speaking of people here). That is another thing the Web Editor should be looking into. Aren’t there rules that we are expected to adhere to? If so, what are they?Recommend
@Meekal Ahmed Personal attacks against people are not allowed. The comment has been deleted. We will work towards having a flag button to report any comments which slip by the web team. Apologies to Nadir, and thank you for bringing it to our attention. Best regards (Web Editor)Recommend
I thank you for your prompt response.Recommend